SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2026 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Self-efficacy scale in behavior management: Validity and reliability study in a Turkish sample

Ayşe Koçyiğit Özlü(HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PR.)0009-0007-3889-4328
Özcan Doğan(HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT)0000-0002-3006-8159
Rabia Şengün Afşin(ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY, BUHARKENT VOCATIONAL SCHOOL, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD CARE AND YOUTH SERVICES, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PR.)0000-0003-1477-3752
Pages
1–15
Publication Date
2026-03-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, findings suggest that the Turkish version of the SEBM scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing teachers’ self-efficacy in managing student behavior in educational settings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to adapt the Self-Efficacy in Behavioral Management (SEBM) scale into Turkish and examine its psychometric properties among teachers in Türkiye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using a cross-sectional methodological design, data were collected from 209 primary and middle school teachers in Aydın and Kocaeli during the 2023–2024 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, findings suggest that the Turkish version of the SEBM scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing teachers’ self-efficacy in managing student behavior in educational settings.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2023–2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Teacher · Self-efficacy · Validity

Abstract

This study aimed to adapt the Self-Efficacy in Behavioral Management (SEBM) scale into Turkish and examine its psychometric properties among teachers in Türkiye. Using a cross-sectional methodological design, data were collected from 209 primary and middle school teachers in Aydın and Kocaeli during the 2023–2024 academic year. The adaptation process followed standard translation and back-translation procedures, and the scale’s validity and reliability were evaluated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Results revealed a single-factor structure explaining 63.76% of the total variance. The model demonstrated acceptable fit indices. Reliability analyses indicated strong internal consistency. Measurement invariance across gender was supported at the configural, metric, and scalar levels. Overall, findings suggest that the Turkish version of the SEBM scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing teachers’ self-efficacy in managing student behavior in educational settings.

Özet

This study aimed to adapt the Self-Efficacy in Behavioral Management (SEBM) scale into Turkish and examine its psychometric properties among teachers in Türkiye. Using a cross-sectional methodological design, data were collected from 209 primary and middle school teachers in Aydın and Kocaeli during the 2023–2024 academic year. The adaptation process followed standard translation and back-translation procedures, and the scale’s validity and reliability were evaluated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Results revealed a single-factor structure explaining 63.76% of the total variance. The model demonstrated acceptable fit indices. Reliability analyses indicated strong internal consistency. Measurement invariance across gender was supported at the configural, metric, and scalar levels. Overall, findings suggest that the Turkish version of the SEBM scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing teachers’ self-efficacy in managing student behavior in educational settings.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özlü, A. K., Doğan, Ö., Afşin, R. Ş. (2026). Self-efficacy scale in behavior management: Validity and reliability study in a Turkish sample. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.1848124

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (74)

  1. Adjei, E. (2018). Relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and classroom management practices in the Kwahu West junior high schools (Doctoral dissertation), University of Cape Coast, Ghana. https://ir.ucc.edu.gh/xmlui/handle/123456789/3853
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development (Vol. 6, pp. 1–60). London: JAI Press.
  5. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New Jersey: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  7. Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161.
  8. Begotti, T., Tirassa, M., & Maran, D. A. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ intervention in school bullying episodes with special education needs students: A research in Italian and Greek samples. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 1908. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091908
  9. Brannon, C., & Clark, K. N. (2024). Profiles of teacher behavior management style: Perceived school climate, stress, and self-efficacy. Contemporary School Psychology, 28(3), 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-023-00479-z
  10. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203471548
  11. Burić, I., & Kim, L. E. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student motivational beliefs: An analysis using multilevel structural equation modeling. Learning and Instruction, 66(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101302
  12. Burić, I., Jakšić, K., & Balaž, B. (2024). Teacher self‐efficacy and teaching quality: A three‐wave longitudinal investigation. International Journal of Psychology, 59(6), 1317–1325. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13255
  13. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. İstanbul: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  14. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86.
  15. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
  16. Can, A. (2024). Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS (12th ed.). İstanbul: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  17. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness-of-fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  18. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  19. Choi, L. J. (2015). Dealing with bullying among students in secondary schools: Sources of teachers’ self-efficacy. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 2(1), 30–40.
  20. Çolak, İ., Yorulmaz, Y. İ., & Altınkurt, Y. (2017). Öğretmen özyeterlik inancı ölçeği geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. MSKU Journal of Education, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.319209
  21. Duan, S., Bissaker, K., & Xu, Z. (2024). Correlates of teachers’ classroom management self-efficacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09881-2
  22. Eddy, C. L., Huang, F. L., Cohen, D. R., Baker, K. M., Edwards, K. D., Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2020). Do teachers’ emotional exhaustion and efficacy predict student discipline outcomes? Journal of School Psychology, 49(3), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1733340
  23. Emmer, E. T., & Hickman, J. (1991). Teacher efficacy in classroom management and discipline. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(3), 755–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164491513027
  24. Fackler, S., Malmberg, L. E., & Sammons, P. (2021). An international perspective on teacher self-efficacy: Personal, structural, and environmental factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103255
  25. Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. New York: Sage Publications.
  26. Fischer, S. M., & Bilz, L. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy in bullying interventions and their probability of intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 56(5), 751–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22217
  27. Fischer, S. M., John, N., & Bilz, L. (2021). Teachers’ self-efficacy in preventing and intervening in school bullying: A systematic review. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 3(3), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-020-00079-y
  28. Floress, M. T., Jenkins, L. N., Caldwell, S., & Hampton, K. (2022). Teacher stress and self-efficacy for managing student behavior. Contemporary School Psychology, 28(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-022-00439-z
  29. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  30. Garner, P. W. (2017). The role of teachers’ social-emotional competence in their beliefs about peer victimization. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 33(4), 288–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2017.1292976
  31. Giallo, R., & Little, E. (2003). Classroom behaviour problems: The relationship between preparedness, classroom experiences, and self-efficacy in graduate and student teachers. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 21–34.
  32. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569
  33. Gómez-Mármol, A., Sánchez-Alcaraz Martínez, B. J., Valero-Valenzuela, A., & De la Cruz-Sánchez, E. (2018). Perceived violence, sociomoral attitudes and behaviours in school contexts. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 13(1), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2018.131.14
  34. Goroshit, M., & Hen, M. (2016). Teachers’ empathy: Can it be predicted by self-efficacy? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(7), 805–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1185818
  35. Greineder, J. L. (2021). Novice secondary teachers’ perceived efficacy and projected responses to bullying behaviors (Publication No. 11290) (Doctoral dissertation), Walden University, Walden. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/11290
  36. Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163230
  37. Gülsün, İ., Malinen, O.-P., Yada, A., & Savolainen, H. (2023). Exploring the role of teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education, their self-efficacy, and collective efficacy in behaviour management in teacher behaviour. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104228
  38. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New York: Pearson.
  39. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185.
  40. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  41. Iqbal, Z. & Zahoor, I. (2024). Students' behavioral problems in the classroom and coping strategies: experiences of secondary school teachers. Bulletin of Education and Research, 46(1), 107–128.
  42. Karaçam, Z. (2019). Ölçme araçlarının Türkçeye uyarlanması. Ebelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 28–37. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/esbder/issue/47180/570514
  43. Keleş, S., & Avcı, R. (2020). Ortaokul öğrencileri için zorbalığa yönelik tutum ölçeği geliştirilmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 54(2), 415–434. Keleş, S., & Özcan, Ş. (2025). Classroom Management Self-Efficacy Scale: An adaptation study. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 14(2), 166–180.
  44. Kengatharan, N., & Gnanarajan, R. (2023). Teacher self-efficacy and student misbehaviour: the moderating role of gender–classroom management. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(2), 507-525. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2022-01416
  45. Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237
  46. Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8
  47. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  48. Malinen, O. P., & Savolainen, H. (2016). The effect of perceived school climate and teacher efficacy in behavior management on job satisfaction and burnout: A longitudinal study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60(1), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.012
  49. Malinen, O. P., Närhi, V., & Savolainen, H. (2024). The effect of teacher self-efficacy in behaviour management on classroom behavioural climate: A longitudinal multilevel cross-lagged analysis. Educational Psychology, 44(4), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2024.2359672
  50. Malinen, O.-P., Savolainen, H., Engelbrecht, P., Xu, J., Nel, M., & Tlale, L. (2013). Exploring teacher self-efficacy of inclusive practices in three diverse countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.004
  51. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311–360.
  52. Moore, D., Benham-Clarke, S., Kenchington, R., Boyle, C., Ford, T., Hayes, R., & Rogers, M. (2019). Improving behaviour in schools: Evidence review. New York: Education Endowment Foundation.
  53. Närhi, V., Kiiski, T., & Savolainen, H. (2017). Reducing disruptive behaviours and improving classroom behavioural climate with class-wide positive behaviour support in middle schools. British Educational Research Journal, 43(6), 1186–1205. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3305
  54. Olweus, D. (1994). Annotation: Bullying at school—Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(7), 1171–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01229.x
  55. Poulou, M. S., Reddy, L. A., & Dudek, C. M. (2019). Relation of teacher self-efficacy and classroom practices: A preliminary investigation. School Psychology International, 40(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318798402
  56. Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
  57. Robson, D. A., & Allen, M. S. (2025). Teacher self-efficacy and two-year change in children’s internalizing and externalizing problems. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 34(4), 1048–1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-025-03028-9
  58. Ruan, J., Nie, Y., Hong, J., Monobe, G., Zheng, G., Kambara, H., & You, S. (2015). Cross-cultural validation of Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale in three Asian countries. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(8), 736–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915574021
  59. Sanches-Ferreira, M., Alves, S., Silveira-Maia, M., Santos, M., Tosto, C., Chifari, A., McGee, C., Savio, N. L., Bilanin, S., & Merlo, G. (2021). A systematic review of behavioral interventions for elementary school children with social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties: Contributions from single-case research studies. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.241
  60. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
  61. Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2
  62. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001
  63. Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
  64. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics: International edition. New York: Pearson.
  65. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  66. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
  67. UNESCO. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366483
  68. Veneziano, L., & Hooper, J. (1997). A method for quantifying content validity of health-related questionnaires. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21(1), 67–70.
  69. Williford, A., & Depaolis, K. J. (2016). Predictors of cyberbullying intervention among elementary school staff: The moderating effect of staff status. Psychology in the Schools, 53(10), 1032–1044. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21969
  70. WHO (2025, May 7). Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study. Copenhagen: WHO. https://www.who.int/europe/initiatives/health-behaviour-in-school-aged-children-(hbsc)-study
  71. Yoon, J. S. (2004). Predicting teacher interventions in bullying situations. Education and Treatment of Children, 27(1), 37–45.
  72. Yoon, J., & Bauman, S. (2014). Teachers: A critical but overlooked component of bullying prevention and intervention. Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947226
  73. Yoon, J., Sulkowski, M. L., & Bauman, S. A. (2014). Teachers’ responses to bullying incidents: Effects of teacher characteristics and contexts. Journal of School Violence, 15(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.963592
  74. Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801