SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Electronic Letters on Science and Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Sliding Mode and Fuzzy Logic MPPT Techniques for PV Systems

PV Sistemler için Kayan Kipli ve Bulanık Mantık MPPT Tekniklerinin Karşılaştırılması

Harun ÖZBAY
Pages
26–35
Publication Date
2020-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The simulation studies were carried out with the PSIM program and results were presented to evaluate the performance of the proposed systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the comparison of the sliding mode controller and Fuzzy logic controller techniques with the simulation studies has been performed for the monitoring of the maximum power point in photovoltaic systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, simulation studies were carried out for different climatic conditions and robustness tests were performed for both MPPT algorithms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The simulation studies were carried out with the PSIM program and results were presented to evaluate the performance of the proposed systems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:PV sistem · maksimum güç noktası takibi · SMC

Abstract

In this study, the comparison of the sliding mode controller and Fuzzy logic controller techniques with the simulation studies has been performed for the monitoring of the maximum power point in photovoltaic systems. In the study, simulation studies were carried out for different climatic conditions and robustness tests were performed for both MPPT algorithms. Maximum power transfer from PV panels is realized in both algorithms. However, the SMC algorithm captured the maximum power point faster than the FLC algorithm system and followed it with higher efficiency. The simulation studies were carried out with the PSIM program and results were presented to evaluate the performance of the proposed systems.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, fotovoltaik sistemlerde (PV) maksimum güç noktasının takibi (MPPT) için kayan kipli denetleyici (SMC) ve Bulanık mantık denetleyici (FLC) tekniklerinin simülasyon çalışmaları ile karşılaştırılması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada farklı iklim koşulları için simülasyon çalışmaları yapılarak her iki MPPT algoritması için sağlamlık testi yapılmıştır. Her iki algoritmada da PV panellerden maksimum güç aktarımı gerçekleştirilmiştir. Fakat SMC algoritmalı sistemin FLC algoritmalı sisteme göre maksimum güç noktasını daha hızlı yakalamış ve daha yüksek verimle takip etmiştir. Yapılan simülasyon çalışmaları PSIM programı ile yapılmış ve önerilen sistemlerin performansını değerlendirmek için sonuçlar sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZBAY, H. (2020). Comparison of Sliding Mode and Fuzzy Logic MPPT Techniques for PV Systems. Electronic Letters on Science and Engineering, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 26–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/133631

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Düz, H., “Storing solar energy inside compressed air through a heat machine mechanism”, Gazi University Journal of Science, 29(2):245-251, 2016
  2. Wenham, S. R., “Applied Photovoltaics”, Routledge, London, 29-39, 2012
  3. Özbay, H., et al. “Farklı Eğim Açılarındaki Fotovoltaik Panellerin Elektriksel Ölçümlerinin Raspberry Pi ile İzlenmesi”, Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 4.2, 2016
  4. Oncu, S., and Karafil, A., “Pulse density modulation controlled converter for PV systems”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42.28, 17823-17830, 2017
  5. Castro, L. M., et al. “Modelling of PV systems as distributed energy resources for steady-state power flow studies”, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 115, 105505, 2020
  6. Leva S., Zaninelli D., and Contino R. “Integrated Renewable Sources for Supplying Remote Power Systems”, WSEAS Transactions on Power Systems, 2(2):41–48, 2007
  7. Villalva M.G., Gazoli J.R. and Filho E.R., ‟Comprehensive approach to modeling and simulation of photovoltaic Array”, IEEE Trans on Power Electronics, 24(5):1198-1208, 2009
  8. Chekired, F., et al. “Implementation of a MPPT fuzzy controller for photovoltaic systems on FPGA circuit”, Energy Procedia, 6:541-549, 2011
  9. Özbay, H., Öncü, S., and Kesler, M. “SMC-DPC based active and reactive power control of grid-tied three phase inverter for PV systems”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42, 28, 17713-17722, 2017
  10. Sundaram, B. M., et al. “Combination of novel converter topology and improved MPPT algorithm for harnessing maximum power from grid connected solar PV systems”, Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology 14.2, 733-746, 2019
  11. Heydari, M., Khoramikia, H., & Fatemi, A. “High-voltage gain SEPIC-based DC–DC converter without coupled inductor for PV systems”, IET Power Electronics, 12(8), 2118-2127, 2019
  12. Kazimierczuk, M. K., “Pulse-width modulated DC-DC power converters”, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 22-145, 2015
  13. Onat, N., “Recent developments in maximum power point tracking technologies for photovoltaic systems”, International Journal of Photoenergy, 1-11, 2010
  14. Rezk, Hegazy, et al. “Design and Hardware Implementation of New Adaptive Fuzzy Logic-Based MPPT Control Method for Photovoltaic Applications”, IEEE Access 7 106427-106438, 2019
  15. Refaat, Mohamed M., et al. “Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Controller as MPPT Optimization Technique Applied to Grid-Connected PV Systems”, Modern Maximum Power Po