Journals / Isı Bilimi ve Tekniği Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

THERMODYNAMIC AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY POWERED KALINA CYCLE

JEOTERMAL ENERJİ KAYNAKLI KALİNA ÇEVRİMİNİN TERMODİNAMİK VE EKONOMİK ANALİZİ

Pages
335–347
Publication Date
2020-10-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, the net present value of this system is calculated as 119.377 Million US$ and it is seen that it is suitable for investment in economic terms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, thermodynamic and economic analysis have been carried out to the determination of optimum design parameters of Kalina Cycle.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the system design with 90 % ammonia mass fraction, the exergy destruction in the evaporator constitutes 66.5 % of the total exergy destruction in the system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, the net present value of this system is calculated as 119.377 Million US$ and it is seen that it is suitable for investment in economic terms.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kalina çevrimi · Jeotermal enerji · Net bugünkü değer

Abstract

In this study, thermodynamic and economic analysis have been carried out to the determination of optimum design parameters of Kalina Cycle. The optimization of four key parameters (turbine inlet pressure, geothermal water outlet temperature at evaporator, condenser pressure and ammonia mass fraction) is also conducted. The thermodynamic properties of the medium temperature geothermal resource in the Simav region are used in the system designs. The energy efficiency and exergy efficiency of the system are evaluated through the thermodynamic analysis. Also, the system has been investigated economically with the net present value method. As a result of the exergy analysis, it is determined that the maximum exergy destruction occurs in the evaporator within the total exergy destruction of the system. In the system design with 90 % ammonia mass fraction, the exergy destruction in the evaporator constitutes 66.5 % of the total exergy destruction in the system. The geothermal water outlet temperature at evaporator, ammonia mass fraction, turbine inlet pressure and condenser pressure of the most effective geothermal energy powered Kalina Cycle are determined as 353.15 K, 90 %, 4808 kPa and 700 kPa, respectively. The energy efficiency and exergy efficiency of this system are calculated as 13.04 % and 51.81 %, respectively. Also, the net present value of this system is calculated as 119.377 Million US$ and it is seen that it is suitable for investment in economic terms.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, jeotermal enerjiyle çalışan Kalina Çevrimi’nin optimum tasarım parametrelerinin belirlenmesi için termodinamik ve ekonomik analizler yapılmıştır. Türbin giriş basıncı, evaporatördeki jeotermal akışkan çıkış sıcaklığı, kondanser basıncı ve amonyak kütle oranı sistemin değişken parametreleridir. Simav bölgesindeki orta sıcaklıklı jeotermal kaynağın termodinamik özellikleri sistem tasarımlarında kullanılmıştır. Sistemin enerji ve ekserji verimleri termodinamik analizler ile değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca, sistem net bugünkü değer yöntemi ile ekonomik olarak incelenmiştir. Ekserji analizi sonucunda, sistemin toplam ekserji yıkımı içerisinde maksimum ekserji yıkımının evaporatörde meydana geldiği tespit edilmiştir. Kütlece % 90 amonyak bileşenli sistem tasarımında, evaporatördeki ekserji yıkımı, sistemdeki toplam ekserji yıkımının % 66.5’ini oluşturmaktadır.Ekserji analizleri sonucunde en yüksek ekserji yıkımının evaporatörde oluştuğu ve % 90 amonyak bileşenli sistem tasarımında, evaporatördeki ekserji yıkımı, toplam sistemdeki ekserji yıkımının % 66.5’ini oluşturmaktadır. En etkin sistem tasarımının enerji verimliliği ve ekserji verimliliği sırasıyla % 13.04 ve % 51.81 olarak belirlenmiştir. Optimum sisteme ait evaporatördeki jeotermal su çıkış sıcaklığı, amonyak kütle oranı, türbin giriş basıncı ve kondenser basıncı sırasıyla 353.15 K, % 90, 4808 kPa ve 700 kPa olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu sisteme ait enerji verimliliği ve ekserji verimliliği sırasıyla % 13.04 ve % 51.81 olarak belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca bu sistemin net bugünkü değeri 119.377 Milyon ABD$ olarak hesaplanmış ve ekonomik açıdan yatırıma uygun olduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

SENTURK, M. (2020). THERMODYNAMIC AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY POWERED KALINA CYCLE. Isı Bilimi ve Tekniği Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 335–347. https://ajindex.com/articles/133301

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Acar, S.M. and Arslan, O., 2017, Exergo-economic evaluation of a new drying system boosted by Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube, Applied Thermal Engineering, 124, 1–16.
  2. Acar, S.M. and Arslan, O., 2019, Energy and exergy analysis of solar energy-integrated, geothermal energy-powered Organic Rankine Cycle, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 137 (2), 659-666.
  3. Aminyavari, M., Najafi, B., Shirazi, A., and Rinaldi, F., 2014, Exergetic, economic and environmental (3E) analyses, and multi objective optimization of a CO2/NH3 cascade refrigeration system, Applied Thermal Engineering, 65, 42-50.
  4. Arslan, O., 2008, Ultimate evaluation of Simav-Eynal geothermal resources: design of integrated system and its energy-exergy analysis, Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Applied Sciences Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkey (in Turkish). Arslan, O., 2010, Exergoeconomic evaluation of electricity generation by the medium temperature geothermal resources, using a Kalina cycle: Simav case study, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 49 (9), 1866-1873.
  5. Arslan, O., 2011, Power generation from medium temperature geothermal resources: ANN-based optimization of Kalina cycle system-34, Energy, 36 (5), 2528-2534.
  6. Ashouri, M., Vandani, A.M.K., Mehrpooya, M., Ahmadi, M.H. and Abdollahpour, A., 2015, Techno-economic assessment of Kalina cycle driven by a parabolic trough solar collector, Energy Conversion and Management, 105, 1328-1339.
  7. Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G. and Moran, M., 1996,
  8. Thermal design and optimization, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., USA. Cao, L., Wang, J., Chen, L. and Dai, Y., 2018, Comprehensive analysis and optimization of Kalina-Flash cycles for low-grade heat source, Applied Thermal Engineering, 131, 540-552.
  9. Deepak, K., Gupta, A.V.S.S.K.S., Srinivas, T., Prabhakar Vattikuti, S.V. and Deva Prasasd, S., 2014, Investigation of separator parameters in Kalina Cycle systems, International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, Special Issue 2, 496-500.
  10. Eller, T., Herberle, F. and Brüggemann, D., 2017, Techno-economic analysis of novel working fluid pairs for the Kalina cycle, Energy Procedia, 129, 113-120.
  11. He, J., Chao, L., Xu, X., Li, Y., Wu, S. and Xu, J., 2014, Performance research on modified KCS (Kalina cycle system) 11without throttle valve, Energy, 64, 389-397.
  12. Igobo, O.N. and Davies, P.A., 2016, Review of low-temperature vapour power cycle engines with quasi-isothermal expansion, Applied Energy, 180, 834-848. Internet, 2019, CEPCI Chemical Engineering Pla