Journals / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4

Evaluating the Economic Impact of Good Post-Harvest Practices on Cocoa Farming in Southwest Nigeria

Adewale Isaac Olutumise(Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko)0000-0003-4600-9265
Abiodun Festus Akinrotimi(Federal University of Technology, Akure)0009-0009-3444-3233
Olanrewaju Peter Oladoyin(Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko)0009-0006-6517-8274
Adeyose Emmanuel Akinbola(Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko)0009-0007-2248-3356
Tolulope Seun Olubunmi-ajayi(Federal University of Technology, Akure)0009-0000-1645-3715
Pages
988–1003
Publication Date
2025-10-03
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study contributes to the discourse on sustainable agriculture and equitable development in the cocoa value chain.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Despite proven benefits in improving product quality and profitability, adoption rates for Good Post-Harvest Practices remain low.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using a well-designed questionnaire, primary data were collected from 200 cocoa farmers through a multistage sampling technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study contributes to the discourse on sustainable agriculture and equitable development in the cocoa value chain.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cocoa farming · Economic impact · Endogenous switching regression model

Abstract

Despite proven benefits in improving product quality and profitability, adoption rates for Good Post-Harvest Practices remain low. Therefore, understanding the factors influencing modern technologies’ adoption and the associated income disparities is crucial for promoting sustainable cocoa farming practices and addressing income inequalities among farmers. Thus, this study evaluates the economic impact of Good Post-Harvest Practices (GPHP) adoption among cocoa farmers in Southwest Nigeria. Using a well-designed questionnaire, primary data were collected from 200 cocoa farmers through a multistage sampling technique. The study employs descriptive statistics, budgetary technique and Endogenous Switching Regression Model (ESRM) to estimate the determinants and income effects of GPHP adoption. Results reveal significant demographic differences between adopters and non-adopters. Adopters, characterized by younger age, higher education levels, and greater access to extension services and modern technologies, achieved significantly higher incomes compared to non-adopters. The budgetary analysis shows that the Total Revenue (TR) of adopters (₦7.206.739.63) exceeded that of non-adopters (₦6.706.739.63), with a return on investment (ROI) of 9.15 for adopters and 7.98 for non-adopters. Key determinants influencing the adoption of GPHP include access to credit, market linkages, and membership in associations. Conversely, larger household sizes, limited market access, and lower social support networks hindered adoption. The Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) estimates indicate that GPHP adoption increased income by 12.77% (₦385.129.30). Therefore, it can be recommended that policies promoting access to credit, education, and market opportunities should be encouraged to bridge the income gap between adopters and non-adopters. This study contributes to the discourse on sustainable agriculture and equitable development in the cocoa value chain.

Özet

Despite proven benefits in improving product quality and profitability, adoption rates for Good Post-Harvest Practices remain low. Therefore, understanding the factors influencing modern technologies’ adoption and the associated income disparities is crucial for promoting sustainable cocoa farming practices and addressing income inequalities among farmers. Thus, this study evaluates the economic impact of Good Post-Harvest Practices (GPHP) adoption among cocoa farmers in Southwest Nigeria. Using a well-designed questionnaire, primary data were collected from 200 cocoa farmers through a multistage sampling technique. The study employs descriptive statistics, budgetary technique and Endogenous Switching Regression Model (ESRM) to estimate the determinants and income effects of GPHP adoption. Results reveal significant demographic differences between adopters and non-adopters. Adopters, characterized by younger age, higher education levels, and greater access to extension services and modern technologies, achieved significantly higher incomes compared to non-adopters. The budgetary analysis shows that the Total Revenue (TR) of adopters (₦7.206.739.63) exceeded that of non-adopters (₦6.706.739.63), with a return on investment (ROI) of 9.15 for adopters and 7.98 for non-adopters. Key determinants influencing the adoption of GPHP include access to credit, market linkages, and membership in associations. Conversely, larger household sizes, limited market access, and lower social support networks hindered adoption. The Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) estimates indicate that GPHP adoption increased income by 12.77% (₦385.129.30). Therefore, it can be recommended that policies promoting access to credit, education, and market opportunities should be encouraged to bridge the income gap between adopters and non-adopters. This study contributes to the discourse on sustainable agriculture and equitable development in the cocoa value chain.

🔖

Cite This Article

Olutumise, A. I., Akinrotimi, A. F., Oladoyin, O. P., Akinbola, A. E., Olubunmi-ajayi, T. S., Abbas, A. M. (2025). Evaluating the Economic Impact of Good Post-Harvest Practices on Cocoa Farming in Southwest Nigeria. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4, 988–1003. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1604969

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Adebiyi, S., Okunlola, J. O. and Akinnagbe, O. M. (2021). Effect of rehabilitation techniques on cocoa beans yield in Southern Nigeria. Scientific Papers: Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 21(3): 45 – 52.
  2. Adegoke, A., Ajayi, S. and Okon, F. (2023). The role of good agricultural practices in enhancing farmers’ productivity: A case study of cocoa farming in Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 13: 100596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100596
  3. Adegoroye, A., Oluwalade, T. A., Adeyelu, A. A., Olorunfemi, O. A. and Mope, C. (2024). Impacts of Farm Business of School (FBS) intervention on the Income of the cocoa farmers in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research, 11(1): 44-57.
  4. Adejuwon, J. O., Tewogbade, K. E., Oguntoke, O. and Ufoegbune, G. C. (2023). Comparing farmers’ perception of climate effect on cocoa yield with climate data in the humid zone of Nigeria. Heliyon, 9(12): e23155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23155
  5. Adesiyan, A. T. and Kehinde, A. D. (2024). Is there a linkage between credit access, land use, and crop diversification in achieving food security? Evidence from cocoa-producing households in Nigeria. Heliyon, 10(16): e35844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35844
  6. Adesiyan, T. F., Yesufu, O. A. and Kehinde, A. D. (2023). Impact of certification on market performance of cocoa industry in Osun State, Nigeria. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1): 100692.
  7. Agbenyo, W., Jiang, Y., Jia, X., Wang, J., Ntim-Amo, G., Dunya, R. and Twumasi, M. A. (2022). Does the adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices impact farmers’ income? Evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7): 3804.
  8. Aikins, S. H. M., Oppong, A. and Boakye, F. (2021). Adopting sustainable agricultural practices: A focus on post-harvest losses in cocoa production. World Development Perspectives, 24: 100043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2021.100043
  9. Akinbola, A. E. (2023). Effect of credit services and socioeconomic factors on the income of cocoa marketers in Ondo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 4(4): 710 – 718. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMRGE.2023.4.4.710-718
  10. Akinrotimi, A. F., Thompson, O. A. and Arifalo, S. F. (2024). Assessing good post-harvest practices and barriers among cocoa farmers and licensed buying agents in Southwest, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 10(3): 60–74. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajraf/2024/v10i3300
  11. Alho, C. F., da Silva, A. F., Hendriks, C. M., Stoorvogel, J. J., Oosterveer, P. J. and Smaling, E. M. (2021). Analysis of banana and cocoa export commodities in food system transformation, with special reference to certification schemes as drivers of change. Food Security, 13: 1555-1575.
  12. Amuda, Y. J. and Alabdulrahman, S. (2024). Cocoa, palm tree, and cassava plantations among smallholder farmers: Toward policy and technological efficiencies for sustainable socio-economic development in Southern Nigeria. Sustainability, 16(2): 477.
  13. Amusa, T. A. and Simonyan, J. B. (2017). Ordered probit analysis of factors influencing farmer’s contributions to climate change adaptation decisions in Southwest Nigeria. Trends in Agricultural Economics, 10: 1-11.
  14. Bolatan, G. I. S., Giadedi, A. and Daim, T. U. (2022). Exploring acquiring technologies: adoption, adaptation, and knowledge management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71: 1950-1958.
  15. Firdauzi, A., Ekowati, T., Prasetyo, A. S. and Mariyono, J. (2024). Factors determining the smallholder farmer’s perception on organic farming: A case of Makmur Sejahtera farmers group, Batu City, Indonesia. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 21(3): 722-731.
  16. Kehinde, A.D. (2021). Agricultural cooperatives and improved technologies adoption among smallholder farmers in cocoa-based farming systems of Southwest Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), 11(4): 467-483.
  17. Kehinde, A.D., Ojo, T., Ogunleye, A. and Ogundeji, A. (2024). Impact of access to cash remittances on cocoa yield in Southwestern Nigeria. Sustainable Futures, 7: 100168.
  18. Krumbiegel, K. and Tillie, P. (2024). Sustainable practices in cocoa production: The role of certification schemes and farmer cooperatives. Ecological Economics, 222: 108211.
  19. National Population Commissions (NPC) (2006). Nigeria: Report on the survey of the demographic and health survey. Retrieved from https://www.nigeria/npc/ (Accessed Date: 15.05.2011).
  20. Ndungu, J., Chomba, C. and Mburu, J. (2023). Agricultural innovations for poverty alleviation: Evaluating sustainable cocoa farming practices. Food Security, 15(1): 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-023-01348-x
  21. Neilson, J., Dwiartama, A., Fold, N. and Permadi, D. (2020). Resource-based industrial policy in an era of global production networks: Strategic coupling in the Indonesian cocoa sector. World Development, 135: 105045.
  22. Nogay, Y. and Azabağaoğlu, M. Ö. (2024). Analysis of factors affecting corn seed preferences of producers: case of Sakarya province, Turkey. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 21(1): 125-138.
  23. Oladoyin, O. P. and Aturamu, O. A. (2022). Cost-benefit analysis of cocoa production in Idanre Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 16(2): 1-10.
  24. Olaleye, A. and Afolayan, J. (2022). Soil and climatic conditions for cocoa productivity: A case study of Southwest Nigeria. Agroforestry Systems, 104: 723-737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-022-00736-1
  25. Olutumise, A. I. (2023). Impact of credit on the climate adaptation utilization among food crop farmers in Southwest, Nigeria: application of endogenous treatment Poisson regression model. Agricultural and Food Economics, 11(1): 7.
  26. Olutumise, A. I., Oparinde, L. O. and Simon-Oke, O. O. (2020). Assessment of income inequality, structure and conduct of cocoa marketers in Osun State, Nigeria. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 25(6): 1-12.
  27. Oluwalade, T. A., Adegoroye, A., Mope, C. and Olorunfemi, O. A. (2023). Performance of Farm Business School (FBS): A case study of cocoa farmers in Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Economics, 5(9): 285-297.
  28. Oni, F. G. O. and Odekunle, T. O. (2016). An assessment of climate change impact on maize (Zea Mays) yield in South-western Nigeria. International Journal of Applied and Natural Sciences, 5(3): 109-114.
  29. Oseni, J. O., Olutumise, A. I. and Olutumise, B. O. (2018). Performance evaluation of cocoa marketing in Osun State, Nigeria. Jurnal Perspektif dan Pembanguan Daerah, 6(1): 97-111.
  30. Owusu, A. B. and Osei, K. B. (2020). Enhancing value through good post-harvest practices in cocoa farming. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 6(1): 1717745. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2020.1717745
  31. van Vliet, J. A., Slingerland, M. A., Waarts, Y. R. and Giller, K. E. (2021). A living income for cocoa producers in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana? Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5: 732831.
  32. Wongnaa, C. A., Jelilu, F., Apike, I. A., Djokoto, J. G. and Awunyo-Vitor, D. (2022). Effect of hybrid cocoa seedlings adoption on profit efficiency in Ghana. Sustainable Futures, 4: 100074.