SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Agro-Morphological Variation in Some Elite Summer Squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) Lines

Bazı Elit Yazlık Kabak (Cucurbita pepo L.), Hatlarında Agro-Morfolojik Varyasyonun Değerlendirilmesi

Abdurrahman Yaşar0000-0001-9782-2032
Ayşe Nur Şavkan(Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi)0000-0002-0826-1243
Önder Türkmen(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3218-6551
Pages
956–967
Publication Date
2025-10-03
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, it was found that the lines formed two main groups and seven subgroups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cucurbita pepo L., belonging to the Cucurbitaceae family, is an important species with high economic value.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The genetic material of the researcher consists of 113 elite summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) lines selected based on morphological characterisation studies conducted on the company's existing genetic resources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, it was found that the lines formed two main groups and seven subgroups.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Elit hatlar · Korelasyon · Küme analizi

Abstract

Cucurbita pepo L., belonging to the Cucurbitaceae family, is an important species with high economic value. This study was carried out within the framework of university and industry cooperation. The genetic material of the researcher consists of 113 elite summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) lines selected based on morphological characterisation studies conducted on the company's existing genetic resources. At the end of the study, hierarchical clustering, principal component, and correlation analyses were performed using data from thirty-five quantitative and qualitative traits of fifty selected elite lines to reveal the relationships among the traits. As a result of the clustering analysis, the distance range among the lines varied between 1.52 and 10.98, and the average coefficient of the resulting dendrogram (similarity average) was determined as 0.638. Additionally, it was found that the lines formed two main groups and seven subgroups. Group A includes a total of forty-two lines. In group B, there are eight lines. As a result of the basic component analysis, seven independent principal component axes among the plants were obtained, and these axes explain 70.23% of the total variation in the pumpkin population. When examining the values of the principal component axes, it was observed that the first principal component axis accounts for 16.81% of the total variation, the second principal component axis accounts for 14.33%, and the third principal component axis accounts for approximately 10.90%. The correlation results obtained indicate clear models and strong correlations showing significant relationships between the morphological and genetic features among the early maturing genotypes and the different groups. These findings provide strategic decisions and valuable information for plant breeding and genetic diversity studies, and they are also useful data for agricultural production and breeding efforts in line with the analyses.

Özet

Cucurbitaceae familyasına ait olan Cucurbita pepo L., yüksek ekonomik değere sahip önemli bir türdür. Bu çalışma, üniversite ve sanayi işbirliği çerçevesinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın genetik materyali, şirketin mevcut gen kaynakları üzerinde yapılan morfolojik karakterizasyon çalışmaları sonucunda seçilen 113 elit yaz kabağı (Cucurbita pepo L.) hattından oluşmaktadır. Çalışmanın sonunda, seçilen 50 elit hattın otuz beş nicel ve nitel verisi kullanılarak, hatlar arasındaki özellikler arasındaki ilişkileri ortaya koymak amacıyla hiyerarşik kümeleme, ana bileşen ve korelasyon analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kümeleme analizi sonucunda, hatlar arasındaki mesafe aralığı 1.52 ile 10.98 arasında değişmiş ve oluşan dendrogramın katsayı ortalaması (benzerlik ortalaması) 0.638 olarak belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, hatların iki ana grup ve yedi alt grup oluşturduğu tespit edilmiştir. Grup A toplamda kırk iki hat içerirken, grup B ise sekiz hattan oluşmaktadır. Temel bileşen analizi sonucunda, bitkiler arasında yedi bağımsız temel bileşen ekseni elde edilmiş ve bu eksenler, kabak popülasyonundaki toplam varyasyonun %70.23'ünü açıklamaktadır. Ana bileşen eksenlerinin değerleri incelendiğinde, birinci ana bileşen ekseninin toplam varyasyonun %16.81'ini, ikinci ana bileşen ekseninin varyasyonun %14.33'ünü ve üçüncü ana bileşen ekseninin toplam varyasyonun yaklaşık %10.90'ını açıkladığı gözlemlenmiştir. Elde edilen korelasyon sonuçları, yaz kabağı genotipleri arasındaki morfolojik ve genetik özellikler arasında belirli değişken grupları arasında önemli ilişkiler olduğunu gösteren net modeller ve güçlü korelasyonlar göstermektedir. Bu bulgular, bitki ıslahı ve genetik çeşitlilik çalışmaları için stratejik kararlar ve değerli bilgiler sunmakta olup, analizlerle uyumlu olarak tarımsal üretim ve ıslah çalışmaları için de faydalı veriler sağlamaktadır. Ayrıca, yeni yüksek verimli çeşitlerin geliştirilmesi, genetik kaynakların korunması ve sürdürülebilir tarım uygulamaları ile tarımsal üretim süreçlerinin optimizasyonu için ıslah çalışmalarının önemli katkılar sağlaması beklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yaşar, A., Şavkan, A. N., Türkmen, Ö. (2025). Evaluation of Agro-Morphological Variation in Some Elite Summer Squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) Lines. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4, 956–967. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1541510

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. Abdi, H. and Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(4): 433-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101
  2. Akışcan, Y. and Yaman, İ. (2018). Determination of yield and some fruit characteristics of different origins loofah populations. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Mustafa Kemal University, 23(2): 300-305.
  3. Aktaş, H. and Durmaz, A. (2023). Characterization of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) landraces regarding to some agronomic traits. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 20(4): 740-754. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1108861
  4. Al-Aysh, F., Al-Serhan, M., Al-Shareef, A., Al-Nasser, M. and Kutma, H. (2012). Study of genetic parameters and character interrelationship of yield and some yield components in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). International Journal of Genetics, 2(2): 29-33. http://doi.org/ijg/2(2)12/3
  5. Baydar, H. (2020). Planr Genetics and Breeding (Bitki Genetiği ve Islahı). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Ankara, Türkiye. ISBN: 978-625-402-208-1. (In Turkish)
  6. Begna, T. (2021). Conventional breeding methods widely used to improve self-pollinated crops. International Journal of Research, 7(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-6224.0701001
  7. Bernousi, I., Emami, A., Tajbakhsh, M. and Darvishzadeh, R. (2011). Studies on genetic variability and correlation among the different traits in Solanum lycopersicum L. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 39(1): 152-158. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha3915859
  8. Blanca, J., Esteras, C., Ziarsolo, P., Pérez, D., Fernandez-Pedrosa, V., Collado, C., Rodrguez de Pablos, R., Ballester, A., Roig, C. and Cañizares, J. (2012). Transcriptome sequencing for SNP discovery across Cucumis melo. BMC Genomics, 13: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-280
  9. Çeğil, İ. K. and Çürük, S. (2019). Studies on in vitro regeneration of chayote. Çukurova Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 34(2): 126-141. https://doi.org/10.36846/CJAFS.2019.5
  10. Çetin, A. N. (2023). Determination of resistance levels of some capia pepper genotypes to TSWV(Tomato spotted wilt virüs) and TMV(Tobacco mosaic virüs) and heterotic groups. (PhD. Thesis) Selçuk University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Horticulture Department., Konya, Türkiye. (In Turkish)
  11. Channa, S. A., Tian, H., Wu, H. Q. and Hu, S. W. (2016). Analysis of genetic diversity among rapeseed cultivars and breeding lines by SRAP and SSR molecular markers. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 48(6): 2409-2422.
  12. Dalda-Şekerci, A., Karaman, K. and Yetişir, H. (2020). Characterization of ornamental pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L. var. ovifera (L.) Alef.) genotypes: molecular, morphological and nutritional properties. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 67: 533-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-020-00883-x
  13. FAOSTAT (2022). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistical Database Rome. http://www.Faostat.fao.org. (Accessed Date: 05.05.2024).
  14. Genç, İ. and Yağbasanlar, T. (2018). Plant Breeding (Bitki Islahı). Çukurova University Press, General Press No: 59, Book Press No: A-13, Adana Türkiye. (In Turkish)
  15. Islam, A. K. M. A., Sarkar, S., Ruma, K. N., Khatun, M., Era, F. M. and Raihan, M. S. (2021). Breeding of sweet gourd (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir.). In: Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Vegetable Crops. Ed(s): Al-Khayri, J. M.; Jaini S. M. and Johnson, D. V. Springer, Cincinnati, OH, U.S.A. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66961-4_8
  16. Islam, S., Hassan, L. and Hossain, M. (2022). Breeding potential of some exotic tomato lines: A combined study of morphological variability, genetic divergence, and association of traits. Phyton, 91(1): 97-114. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2022.017251
  17. JMP (2017). JMP Statistics Software (17.00) for Cluster and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Available at: https://www.jmp.com/en_us/home.html (Accessed Date: 15.05.2024)
  18. Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. F. and Comstock, R. E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy Journal, 47(7): 314-318. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x
  19. Khan, A. S. M. M. R., Eyasmin, R., Rashid, M. H., Ishtiaque and Chaki, A. K. (2017). Variability, heritability, character association, path analysis and morphological diversity in snake gourd. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 50(6): 483-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anres.2016.07.005
  20. Mavi, K., Gündüz, K., Uzunoğlu, F. and Karaat, F. E. (2021). Morphological characterization of sponge gourd (Luffa aegyptiaca Mill.) genotypes from the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Genetica, 53(3): 1043-1064.https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR2103043M
  21. Montes-Hernandez, S., Merrick, L. C. and Eguiarte, L. E. (2005). Maintenance of squash (Cucurbita spp.) landrace diversity by farmers' activities in Mexico. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52: 697-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-003-6018-4
  22. Nacar, Ç., Aras, V., Tekin, S., Fidan, H., Ünlü, M. and Sarı, N. (2017). Determination of genetic diversity by SRAP marker systems in tolerant to Zuccuni yellow mosaic virus in squash (Cucurbita pepo). Academic Journal of Agriculture, 6: 115-120.
  23. Narolia, R. K. and Reddy, R. V. S. K. (2010). Genetic diversity among tomato (Solanum Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettsd.) genotypes- A review. Agricultural Reviews, 31(3): 217-223. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.902.330
  24. Özer, M. Ö., Kar, H., Doğru, S. M. and Bekar, N. K. (2021). Morphological characterization of some hybrid red head cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata subvar. rubra) varieties. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 18(3): 428-435. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.806274
  25. Ribaut, J. M., Jiang, C. and Hoisington, D. (2002). Simulation experiments on efficiencies of gene introgression by backcrossing. Crop Science, 42: 557-565. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.5570
  26. Şahiner-Öylek, H. (2022). Researches on selection of wild pear (pyrus elaeagnifolia) grown in Diyarbakir and its surroundings. (PhD Thesis) Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Uinversity, Institute of Graduate Education, Horticulture Department, Bolu, Türkiye. (In Turkish)
  27. Sajid, M. B., Sarker, K. K., Monshi, F. I., Sultana, S., Monika, M. A. and Bhuiyan, M. S. U. (2022). Assessing the genetic diversity of squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) genotypes based on agro-morphological traits and genetic analysis: Evaluation of squash genetic diversity. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 17(1): 51-62. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v17i1.1245
  28. Şavkan, A. N. and Türkmen, Ö. (2023). Morphological characterization and selection in some summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) genotypes. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(4): 665-674. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1332485
  29. Şavkan, A. N., Başak, H. and Türkmen, Ö. (2024). Morphological characterization of some capia pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) genotypes. Journal Of Agriculture and Nature, 27(6): 1332-1342. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1440798
  30. Şavkan, A. N., Dal Canbar, Y. and Türkmen, Ö. (2025a). Identification and selection of genetic diversity of some selected summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.). Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 35(1): 121-134. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1567738.
  31. Şavkan, A. N., Başak, H., Uncu, A. T. and Türkmen, Ö. (2025b). Morphological characterization and molecular marker-assisted selection for resistance to Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) in S2 population of capia pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 72: 767–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-024-02013-3
  32. Silva, N. C. D., Queiróz, M. A. D. and Barbosa, B. L. (2024). Evaluation and morpho-agronomic characterization of pumpkin accessions from the semiarid region of the northeast of Brazil. Revista Caatinga, 37: e11614.https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252024v3711614rc
  33. Soltani, F., Karimi, R. and Kashi, A. (2016). Estimation of genetic diversity in Cucurbita species using morphological and phytochemical analysis. International Journal of Vegetable Science, 2016(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2016.1174968
  34. Taş, K. (2020). Morphological and molecular characterization of Capsicum chinense genotypes. (MSc. Thesis). Ondokuz Mayıs University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Horticulture Department, Samsun, Türkiye. (In Turksih)
  35. Tian, H. Y., Channa, S. A. and Hu, S. W. (2017). Relationships between genetic distance, combining ability and heterosis in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Euphytica, 213(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1788-x
  36. UPOV (2006). Cucurbita pepo L. International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. https://www.upov.int/portal/index.html.en (Accessed Date: 15.05. 2024)
  37. Yaşar, A., Şavkan, A. N. and Türkmen, Ö. (2025). Agromorphological characterization and molecular evaluation of a marker associated with Zym-1 allele resistance of local zucchini genotypes. Euphytica, 221(77): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-025-03538-z
  38. Bernousi, I., Emami, A., Tajbakhsh, M. and Darvishzadeh, R. (2011). Studies on genetic variability and correlation among the different traits in Solanum lycopersicum L. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 39(1): 152-158. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha3915859
  39. FAOSTAT (2022). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistical Database Rome. http://www.Faostat.fao.org. (Accessed Date: 05.05.2024).