SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3

Microsatellite-Based Assessment of Genetic Variation and Demographic Bottlenecks in Kilis Goats Between Two Agro-Ecological Zones

İki Tarımsal-Ekolojik Bölgedeki Kilis Keçilerinde Mikrosatellit Belirteçlerle Genetik Çeşitlilik ve Demografik Darboğazların Değerlendirilmesi

Zühal Gündüz(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-1427-1501
Nezih Ata(ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0387-5131
Onur Yılmaz(ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5658-8558
İbrahim Cemal(ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4069-4815
Orhan Karaca(ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7323-9173
Mahmut Keskin(MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8147-2477
Sabri Gül(MUSTAFA KEMAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6787-8190
Hatice Yilmaz Tilki(MUSTAFA KEMAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9308-2169
Pages
1027–1042
Publication Date
2026-05-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results demonstrate that the Kilis goat population exhibits high genetic diversity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Kilis goats, one of Türkiye's prominent indigenous goat breeds, are extensively raised in the southern regions of the country due to its exceptional milk production potential.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to investigate the population dynamics of the Kilis goats, which are renowned for their high milk yield and remarkable adaptability, at the molecular genetic level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results demonstrate that the Kilis goat population exhibits high genetic diversity.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kilis keçisi · Bereketli hilal · Genetik çeşitlilik

Abstract

The Kilis goats, one of Türkiye's prominent indigenous goat breeds, are extensively raised in the southern regions of the country due to its exceptional milk production potential. This study aimed to investigate the population dynamics of the Kilis goats, which are renowned for their high milk yield and remarkable adaptability, at the molecular genetic level. A total of 190 individuals from Kilis goat populations raised in two different provinces were characterized using 16 microsatellites. A total of 274 alleles were detected across all loci studied. The results for the mean number of alleles, expected heterozygosity, and polymorphic information content were 17.13, 0.85, and 0.83, respectively. It was revealed that 99.0% of the total genetic variation can be attributed to genetic differences among individuals, while only 1.0% can be explained by differences among populations. The FST value obtained (0.022) indicates a low level of genetic differentiation between the studied populations. These findings consistently indicate a high degree of genetic similarity and effective gene flow between the two provincial populations. STRUCTURE analysis revealed the presence of three distinct genetic clusters among the studied populations, indicating intra-breed sub structuring rather than clear inter-population divergence. Bottleneck analysis the analysis produced an L-shaped curve in the allele frequency distribution, indicating no significant recent genetic bottleneck in the studied populations. This study provides important insights into the genetic diversity and population structure of Kilis goat populations raised in the Gaziantep and Kilis provinces. The results demonstrate that the Kilis goat population exhibits high genetic diversity. Overall, the results highlight substantial within-breed genetic diversity, low inter-population differentiation, and the absence of a recent demographic bottleneck, providing a scientific foundation for sustainable genetic management.

Özet

Türkiye’nin önemli yerli keçi ırklarından biri olan Kilis keçisi, yüksek süt verim potansiyeli nedeniyle özellikle ülkenin güney bölgelerinde yaygın olarak yetiştiriciliği yapılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, yüksek süt verimi ve dikkat çekici adaptasyon yeteneği ile bilinen Kilis keçilerinin popülasyon dinamiklerinin moleküler genetik düzeyde araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada, iki farklı ilde yetiştirilen Kilis keçisi popülasyonlarına ait toplam 190 birey, 16 mikrosatellit belirteç kullanılarak incelenmiştir. İncelenen tüm lokuslarda toplam 274 allel tespit edilmiştir. Ortalama allel sayısı, beklenen heterozigotluk ve polimorfik bilgi içeriği bakımından değerler sırasıyla 17.13, 0.85 ve 0.83 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Toplam genetik varyasyonun %99.0’ının bireyler arası genetik farklılıklardan kaynaklandığı, yalnızca %1.0’ının ise popülasyonlar arasındaki farklılıklarla açıklanabildiği ortaya konulmuştur. Elde edilen FST değeri (0.022), incelenen popülasyonlar arasında düşük düzeyde genetik farklılaşma olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulgular, iki ildeki popülasyonlar arasında yüksek düzeyde genetik benzerlik ve etkin gen akışı bulunduğunu tutarlı biçimde ortaya koymaktadır. STRUCTURE analizi, incelenen popülasyonlarda üç farklı genetik kümenin varlığını ortaya koymuş olup, bu durum belirgin popülasyonlar arası ayrışmadan ziyade ırk içi alt yapılanmaya işaret etmektedir. Bottleneck analizi sonucunda, allel frekans dağılımında L-şekilli bir eğri elde edilmiş ve bu durum, incelenen popülasyonlarda yakın geçmişte önemli bir genetik darboğaz yaşanmadığını göstermiştir. Bu çalışma, Gaziantep ve Kilis illerinde yetiştirilen Kilis keçisi popülasyonlarının genetik çeşitliliği ve popülasyon yapısı hakkında önemli bilgiler sunmaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, Kilis keçisi popülasyonunun yüksek genetik çeşitlilik sergilediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Genel olarak bulgular, yüksek düzeyde ırk içi genetik çeşitlilik, düşük popülasyonlar arası farklılaşma ve yakın geçmişte demografik bir darboğazın bulunmadığını göstermekte olup, Kilis keçisinin sürdürülebilir ıslah stratejileri için bilimsel bir temel sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gündüz, Z., Ata, N., Yılmaz, O., Cemal, İ., Karaca, O., Keskin, M., Gül, S., Tilki, H. Y. (2026). Microsatellite-Based Assessment of Genetic Variation and Demographic Bottlenecks in Kilis Goats Between Two Agro-Ecological Zones. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3, 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1798311

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (62)

  1. Agaoglu, Ö. K. and Ertugrul, O. (2012). Assessment of genetic diversity, genetic relationship and bottleneck using microsatellites in some native Turkish goat breeds. Small Ruminant Research, 105(1): 53–60.
  2. Anonymous (2011). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). https://www.fao.org/4/i2413e/i2413e00.pdf (Accessed Date: 08.08.2025).
  3. Anonymous (2024). Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK). https://www.tuik.gov.tr (Accessed Date: 10.01.2024). Bayraktar, M., Cebeci, Z. and Gökçe, G. (2024). Analysing the genetic diversity and population structure of five native Turkish cattle breeds using SNP data. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 59(3): e14545.
  4. Bilginer, U., Demir, E., Karsli, B. A., Doğru, H., Kaya, S., Meydan, H., Yağcı, S., Karacaören, B. and Karsli, T. (2025). Unveiling genomic diversity and population structure in three Anatolian goats at genome-wide level. Small Ruminant Research, 107570.
  5. Borsting, C., Pereira, V., Andersen, J. D. and Morling, N. (2016). Single Nucleotide Polymorphism. In: A Guide to Forensic DNA Profiling, Ed(s): Jamieson, A. and Bader, S., Wiley, Glasgow, U. K.
  6. Cemal, İ., Ata, N., Yılmaz, O. and Karaca, O. (2024). Molecular assessment of genetic diversity and bottleneck in Hair goat reared in Türkiye. Journal of Animal Production, 65(1): 49–58.
  7. Dakin, E. E. and Avise, J. C. (2004). Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity, 93(5): 504–509.
  8. Daşkıran, İ., Teke, B. E., Atik, A., and Güngör, İ. (2024). Implementation processes and support policy of the public small ruminant breeding national project in Türkiye Journal of Bahri Dagdas Animal Research, 13(2), 53-67. (In Turkish)
  9. Daşkıran, İ., Yılmaz, A. and Günbey, V. S. (2022). Yetiştirici koşullarındaki Kilis keçilerinin laktasyon süt verimi ve süt kalite özellikleri üzerine bir çalışma. Journal of Tekirdag Agircultural Faculty, 19(3): 678–687. (In Turkish)
  10. Demir, E. (2024). Microsatellite-based bottleneck analysis and migration events among four native Turkish goat breeds. Archives Animal Breeding, 67(3): 353–360.
  11. Demir, E., Moravčíková, N., Kaya, S., Kasarda, R., Doğru, H., Bilginer, Ü., Balcıoğlu, M. S. and Karsli, T. (2023). Genome-wide genetic variation and population structure of native and cosmopolitan cattle breeds reared in Türkiye. Animal Biotechnology, 34(8): 3877-3886.
  12. Demiray, A., Gündüz, Z., Ata, N., Yılmaz, O., Cemal, I., Konyalı, A., Semen, Z., Altuntaş, A., Atik, A., Akçay, A., Baş, H. and Şenyüz, H. H. (2024). Genetic diversity and population structure of Anatolian Hair goats, an ancient breed. Archives Animal Breeding, 67(1): 13–23.
  13. Di Rienzo, A., Peterson, A. C., Garza, J. C., Valdes, A. M., Slatkin, M. and Freimer, N. B. (1994). Mutational processes of simple sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91(8): 3166–3170.
  14. Earl, D. A., and vonHoldt, B. M. (2012). Structure Harvester: A website and program for visualizing Structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources, 4(2): 359–361.
  15. Erduran, H. (2023). Adaptation of reproductive and growth traits of primiparous Kilis Goats to high-altitude mountain areas. COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 11(2): 268-275.
  16. Erduran, H. and Boztepe, S. (2025). Adaptation studies of Kilis goats to high mountain areas and terrestrial climate: Effects of environmental factors on milk production and physico-chemical properties of milk. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 49(2): 48-58.
  17. Ernie Muneerah, M. A., Md Tamrin, N. A., Salisi, M. S., Zulkifly, S., Ghazali, S. S. M., Temuli, J. J. and Mamat-Hamidi, K. (2021). Microsatellite-based genetic characterization of the indigenous Katjang goat in Peninsular Malaysia. Animals, 11(5): 1328.
  18. Evanno, G., Regnaut, S., and Goudet, J. (2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software Structure: A simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14: 2611–2620.
  19. Falush, D., Stephens, M. and Pritchard, J. K. (2003). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics, 164: 1567–1587.
  20. Falush, D., Stephens, M. and Pritchard, J. K. (2007). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Dominant markers and null alleles. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7: 574–578.
  21. FAO. (2011). Molecular genetic characterization of animal genetic resources. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/4/i2413e/i2413e00.htm (Accessed Date: 26.06.2023)
  22. Garnier-Gere, P. and Chikhi, L. (2013). Population Subdivision, Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium and The Wahlund Effect. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0005446.pub3
  23. Goudet, J. (2001). FSTAT (Version 2.9.3.): A Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices. University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  24. Gül, S., Keskin, M., Göçmez, Z. and Gündüz, Z. (2016). Effects of supplemental feeding on performance of Kilis goats kept on pasture condition. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 15(1): 110-115.
  25. Gül, S., Yılmaz, O., Gündüz, Z., Keskin, M., Cemal, I., Ata, N. and Önel, S. E. (2020). The genetic structure of the goat breeds belonging to Northwest part of Fertile Crescent. Small Ruminant Research, 182: 22–28.
  26. Gündüz, Z. (2025). Combined genotype effects of PRLR and GH polymorphisms on litter weight in Kilis goats. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 22(3): 793–802.
  27. Gündüz, Z. and Biçer, O. (2023). Milk-y Way: The impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms on milk production traits in Kilis dairy goats. Archives Animal Breeding, 66(4): 369–378.
  28. Gündüz, Z., Yılmaz, O., Cemal, İ. and Biçer, O. (2016). A comparison of old and modern type DNA marker technologies and their impact on animal breeding programs. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 6(2): 175–180.
  29. Hecker, K. H. and Roux, K. H. (1996). High and low annealing temperatures increase both specificity and yield in touchdown and stepdown PCR. Biotechniques, 20: 478–485.
  30. Hubisz, M. J., Falush, D., Stephens, M. and Pritchard, J. K. (2009). Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9: 1322–1332.
  31. Kalinowski, S. T., Taper, M. L. and Marshall, T. C. (2007). Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology, 16: 1099–1106.
  32. Karaca, O., Cemal, I., Taşkın, T., Gökdal, Ö., Yılmaz, O., Yaralı, E., and Özdoğan, M. (2014). Koyun-Keçi Genetik Islah Çalıştayı Notları. Publications of the Central Association of Sheep and Goat Breeders of Türkiye, 1–229 (In Turkish).
  33. Karaköse, İ. and Gündüz, Z. (2025). Maternal haplotype diversity and phylogenetic relationships of Damascus, Kilis, Hatay and Kil goat breeds: Insight from mtDNA D-loop sequences in the fertile crescent. Archives Animal Breeding, 68(4): 607-618.
  34. Katti, M. V., Ranjekar, P. K. and Gupta, V. S. (2001). Differential distribution of simple sequence repeats in eukaryotic genome sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18(7): 1161–1167.
  35. Kawęcka, A., Podbielska, A., Miksza-Cybulska, A., Pasternak, M., Sikora, J. and Szmatoła, T. (2022). Genetic structure of reconstituted native Carpathian goat breed based on information from microsatellite markers. Annals of Animal Science, 22(4): 1235–1244.
  36. Keskin, M., Gül, S., Biçer, O. and Daşkıran, İ. (2017). Some reproductive, lactation, and kid growth characteristics of Kilis goats under semi-intensive conditions. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 41: 248–254.
  37. Keskin, M., Yilmaz, O., Gündüz, Z., Ata, N., Gül, S., Cemal, I., Karaca, O. and Önel, S. E. (2019). Microsatellite panels for parentage testing of Kilis goats reared in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 43(1): 94-101.
  38. Kopelman, N. M., Mayzel, J., Jakobsson, M., Rosenberg, N. A. and Mayrose, I. (2015). CLUMPAK: A program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Molecular Ecology Resources, 15(5): 1179–1191.
  39. Lai, F. Y., Yin, C. Y., Ding, S. T., Tu, P. A. and Wang, P. H. (2023). Analysis of the population genetic structure using microsatellite markers in goat populations in Taiwan. Animal Biotechnology, 34(8): 3294–3305.
  40. Langella, O. (1999). Populations (Version 1.2.32). http://bioinformatics.org/tryphon/populations/ (Accessed Date: 07.07.2025).
  41. Li, Y. C., Korol, A. B., Fahima, T., and Nevo, E. (2004). Microsatellites within genes: structure, function and evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21(6): 991–1007.
  42. Luikart, G., Allendorf, F. W., Cornuet, J. M., and Sherwin, W. B. (1998). Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. Journal of Heredity, 89(3): 238–247.
  43. Marshall, T. C. (2006). CERVUS 3.0: A computer program for assignment of parents to their offspring using genetic markers. Field Genetics, http://www.fieldgenetics.com (Access Date: 09.07.2025).
  44. Miller, S. A., Dykes, D. D. and Polesky, H. F. (1988). A simple salting-out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Research, 16(3): 1215.
  45. Montgomery, G. W. and Sise, J. A. (1990). Extraction of DNA from sheep white blood cells. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 33: 437–441.
  46. Mukhina, V., Svishcheva, G., Voronkova, V., Stolpovsky, Y. and Piskunov, A. (2022). Genetic diversity, population structure and phylogeny of indigenous goats of Mongolia revealed by SNP genotyping. Animals, 12(3): 221.
  47. Muner, R. D., Moaeen-ud-Din, M., Bilal, G., Waheed, H. M., Khan, M. S., Asad, M. J. and Kuthu, Z. H. (2021). Exploring genetic diversity and population structure of Punjab goat breeds using Illumina 50K SNP bead chip. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53(3): 368.
  48. Pakpahan, S., Widayanti, R., Artama, W. T., Budisatria, I. G. S., Raadsma, H. W. and Margawati, E. T. (2023). Genetic diversity analysis of Indonesian indigenous goat breeds based on microsatellite markers. Small Ruminant Research, 225: 107011.
  49. Peakall, R. and Smouse, P. E. (2012). GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics, 28: 2537–2539.
  50. Piry, S., Luikart, G. and Cornuet, J. M. (1999). BOTTLENECK: A computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. Journal of Heredity, 90(4): 502–503.
  51. Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. and Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155: 945–959.
  52. Rambout, A. (2006). FigTree 1.4.2. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/ (Accessed Date: 07.07.2025).
  53. Srivastava, S., Avvaru, A. K., Sowpati, D. T. and Mishra, R. K. (2019). Patterns of microsatellite distribution across eukaryotic genomes. BMC Genomics, 20(1): 153.
  54. Tefiel, H., Ata, N., Chahbar, M., Benyarou, M., Fantazi, K., Yilmaz, O., Cemal, İ., Karaca, O., Boudouma, D. and Gaouar, S. B. S. (2018). Genetic characterization of four Algerian goat breeds assessed by microsatellite markers. Small Ruminant Research, 160: 65-71.
  55. Togan, İ., Soysal, İ., Berkman, C. C. and Koban, E. (2005). Molecular markers in conservation of the breeds. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 2(1): 44–49. (In Turkish)
  56. Toth, G., Gaspari, Z. and Jurka J. (2000). Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: survey and analysis. Genome Research, 10(7): 967–981.
  57. Vignal, A., Milan, D., SanCristobal, M. and Eggen, A. (2002). A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. Genetics Selection Evolution, 34(3): 275-305.
  58. Weir, B. S. and Cockerham, C. C. (1984). Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38: 1358–1370.
  59. Whannou, H. R. V., Spanoghe, M., Dayo, G. K., Demblon, D., Lanterbecq, D. and Dossa, L. H. (2023). Genetic diversity assessment of the indigenous goat population of Benin using microsatellite markers. Frontiers in Genetics, 14: 1079048.
  60. Wright, S. (1990). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 52(1): 241-295.
  61. Yordanov, G., Kalaydzhiev, G., Palova, N., Salkova, D., Lozanova, L., Dundarova, H. and Hristov, P. (2024). Genetic differentiation and population structure of two Bulgarian local goat breeds using microsatellite markers. Diversity, 16(7): 14242818.
  62. Zhao, P., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Guo, H., Li, J. and Yuan, H. (2023). Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship estimation of Shanxi indigenous goat breeds using microsatellite markers. Animal Biotechnology, 35(1): 2276717.