SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The European Research Journal / 2026 / Volume: 6 Issue: 4

Retrospective evaluation of indications and birth results of cesarean section due to ophthalmologic diseases

Bora Coşkun(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liv Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey)0000-0002-2338-7186
Serdar Özateş(Department of Ophtalmology, Kars State Hospital, Kars, Turkey)0000-0002-0365-8786
Buğra Coşkun(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liv Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey)0000-0003-1938-3833
Mehmet Ferdi Kıncı(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Training and Research Hospital, Muğla, Turkey)0000-0003-0487-1201
Coşkun Şimşir(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liv Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey)0000-0003-4919-6748
Pages
—
Publication Date
2020-07-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of cesarean section due to ophthalmologic indications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of cesarean section due to ophthalmologic indications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of cesarean section due to ophthalmologic indications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of cesarean section due to ophthalmologic indications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:cesarean section · myopia · retinal detachment

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of cesarean section due to ophthalmologic indications.

🔖

Cite This Article

Coşkun, B., Özateş, S., Coşkun, B., Kıncı, M. F., Şimşir, C. (2020). Retrospective evaluation of indications and birth results of cesarean section due to ophthalmologic diseases. The European Research Journal, Volume: 6 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.559681

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Declercq E, Young R, Cabral H, Ecker J. Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007. Birth 2011;38:99-104.
  2. Erol H, Özdemir A. [Health reforms and the evaluation of health expenditures in Turkey]. Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi 2014,4:9-34. [Article in Turkish]
  3. Ulubay M, Öztürk M, Fidan U, Keskin U, Fıratlıgil FB, Kıncı MF, et al. Skin incision lengths in caesarean section. Cukurova Med J 2016,41:82-6.
  4. Festin MR, Laopaiboon M, Pattanittum P, Ewens MR, Henderson-Smart DJ, Crowther CA; SEA-ORCHID Study Group. Caesarean section in four South East Asian countries: reasons for, rates, associated care practices and health outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009,9:17.
  5. Puzio M, Szczurowicz A, Rogoza A, Zwaliński M. [Non-obstetric indications for cesarean section from five years of material]. Ginekol Pol 1996,67:383-6. [Article in Polish]
  6. Taner P, Akarsu C. [Ophthalmic changes in pregnancy]. J Ret-Vit 2001,9:169-78. [Article in Turkish]
  7. Socha MW, Piotrowiak I, Jagielska I, Kazdepka-Ziemińska A, Szymański M, Duczmal M, et al. [Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008 -- our own experience]. Ginekol Pol 2010;81:188-91. [Article in Polish]
  8. Chiu H, Steele D, McAlister C, Lam WC. Delivery recommendations for pregnant females with risk factors for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Can J Ophthalmol 2015;50:11-8.
  9. Loncarek K, Petrovic O, Brajac I. Myopia and operative delivery in Croatia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004;85:287-8.
  10. Inglesby DV, Little BC, Chignell AH. Surgery for detachment of the retina should not affect a normal delivery. BMJ 1990;300:980.
  11. Psenkova P, Bucko M, Braticak M, Baneszova R, Zahumensky J. Impact of introducing specific measures to reduce the frequency of cesarean delivery for non‐obstetric indications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018;142:23-7.
  12. Mackensen F, Paulus WE, Max R, Ness T. Ocular changes during pregnancy. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014;111:567-76.
  13. Landau D, Seelenfreund MH, Tadmor O, Silverstone BZ, Diamant Y. The effect of normal childbirth on eyes with abnormalities predisposing to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1995;233:598-600.
  14. Jünemann AG, Sterk N, Rejdak R. [Influence of mode of delivery on pre-existing eye diseases]. Ophthalmologe 2012;109:229-34. [Article in German]
  15. Mohammadi SF, Letafat-Nejad M, Ashrafi E, Delshad-Aghdam H. A survey of ophthalmologists and gynecologists regarding termination of pregnancy and choice of delivery mode in the presence of eye diseases. J Curr Ophthalmol 2017;29:126-32.