Journals / The European Research Journal / 2026 / Volume: 11 Issue: 1

Myotonia may be a sign that prompts genetic testing for myotonic dystrophy type 1

Metin Eser(Department of Medical Genetics, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye)0000-0001-7118-7958
Gulam Hekimoğlu(Department of Histology and Embryology, International Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye)0000-0002-5027-6756
Büşra Kutlubay(Department of Pediatrics Neurology, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye)0000-0002-6216-1438
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-01-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Genetic counseling is crucial for understanding disease variability, aiding in better DM1 management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by myotonia, atrophy, and muscle weakness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Even though myotonic discharges can be shown on electromyography in DM1 instances, it is still difficult to distinguish DM1 clinically from other myotonic disorders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Genetic counseling is crucial for understanding disease variability, aiding in better DM1 management.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) · DM1 protein kinase gene · myotonia

Abstract

Objectives: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by myotonia, atrophy, and muscle weakness. Even though myotonic discharges can be shown on electromyography in DM1 instances, it is still difficult to distinguish DM1 clinically from other myotonic disorders. We aimed to examine the relationship between DM1 and myotonia. Methods: Data from 22 patients who had myotonia were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with DM1 (n=9) and non-DM1 myotonia (n=13) were categorized by genetic testing. Results: There was a significant difference in the incidence rates of myotonia (P=0.0001) between 8 out of 9 DM1 patients (89%) and 1 out of 13 non-DM1 (8%). Myotonic discharges were seen in 7 of the 9 DM1 (78%) patients. On the other hand, only 2 out of 13 (15%) patients with non-DM1 had myotonic discharges. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence rates across the groups (P=0.003). In this study, we also encountered three siblings with DM1. We observed myotonia and muscle weakness in the twins, indicating there is a possibility of anticipation being seen in their grandchildren in the future. Conclusion: Genetic counseling is crucial for understanding disease variability, aiding in better DM1 management.

🔖

Cite This Article

Eser, M., Hekimoğlu, G., Kutlubay, B. (2025). Myotonia may be a sign that prompts genetic testing for myotonic dystrophy type 1. The European Research Journal, Volume: 11 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1553885

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bird TD. Myotonic dystrophy type 1. 2021. Book from University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle (WA). 2021 Mar 25.
  2. Johnson NE, Butterfield RJ, Mayne K, et al. Population-Based Prevalence of Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Using Genetic Analysis of Statewide Blood Screening Program. Neurology. 2021;96(7):e1045-e1053. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011425.
  3. Meola G. Clinical aspects, molecular pathomechanisms and management of myotonic dystrophies. Acta Myol. 2013 Dec;32(3):154-165.
  4. Hahn C, Salajegheh MK. Myotonic disorders: A review article. Iran J Neurol. 2016;15(1):46-53.
  5. Thornton CA. Myotonic dystrophy. Neurol Clin. 2014;32(3):705-719, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.04.011.
  6. Hehir MK, Logigian EL. Electrodiagnosis of myotonic disorders. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2013;24(1):209-220. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2012.08.015.
  7. Miller TM. Differential diagnosis of myotonic disorders. Muscle Nerve. 2008;37(3):293-299. doi: 10.1002/mus.20923.
  8. Sznajder ŁJ, Swanson MS. Short Tandem Repeat Expansions and RNA-Mediated Pathogenesis in Myotonic Dystrophy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(13):3365. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133365.
  9. Gea J, Pascual S, Casadevall C, Orozco-Levi M, Barreiro E. Muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: update on causes and biological findings. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(10):E418-438. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.08.04.
  10. Day JW, Ricker K, Jacobsen JF, et al. Myotonic dystrophy type 2: molecular, diagnostic and clinical spectrum. Neurology. 2003;60(4):657-664. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000054481.84978.f9.
  11. Turner C, Hilton-Jones D. The myotonic dystrophies: diagnosis and management. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(4):358-367. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.158261.
  12. Rakocević-Stojanović V, Savić D, Pavlović S, et al. Intergenerational changes of CTG repeat depending on the sex of the transmitting parent in myotonic dystrophy type 1. Eur J Neurol. 2005;12(3):236-2367. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.01075.x.
  13. Martorell L, Cobo AM, Baiget M, Naudó M, Poza JJ, Parra J. Prenatal diagnosis in myotonic dystrophy type 1. Thirteen years of experience: implications for reproductive counselling in DM1 families. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27(1):68-72. doi: 10.1002/pd.1627.
  14. Khoshbakht R, Soltanzadeh A, Zamani B, et al. Correlation between distribution of muscle weakness, electrophysiological findings and CTG expansion in myotonic dystrophy. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(7):1123-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.09.016.
  15. Turner C, Hilton-Jones D. Myotonic dystrophy: diagnosis, management and new therapies. Curr Opin Neurol. 2014;27(5):599-606. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000128.
  16. Udd B, Krahe R. The myotonic dystrophies: molecular, clinical, and therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(10):891-905. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70204-1.