Journals / The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Factors that affect the outcome of open-technique procedures performed in the treatment of cholesteatoma

Kolesteatom nedeniyle açık tenik cerrahi uygulanan olgularda başarıyı etkileyen faktörler

Osman Nuri Özgirgin(Başkent Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi KBB Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı)
Erdinç Aydın(Başkent Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi KBB Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı)
Levent Naci Özlüoğlu(Bayındır Tıp Merkezi, KBB Hastalıkları Bölümü, Ankara.)
Tuncay Özçelik(Başkent Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi KBB Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2003-04-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Revision surgery was per­ formed in four patients 7.1% due to residual cholesteatoma within a five-year follow-up.Conclusion: The height of the facial ridge was found as the most important factor related to a successful outcome of open-technique procedures.Other factors included the creation of a smooth mastoid cavity with round edges, removal of ali diseased mastoid cells, and an extensive conchameatoplasty.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: We evaluated the factors that have considerable significance on the outcome of open cavi- ty procedures in the treatment of cholesteatoma.Patients and Methods: The study included 66 patients 43 males, 23 females; mean age 47 years; range 21 to 69 years who underwent surgery for cholesteatoma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Of these, 56 patients completed at least a five-year follow-up.Results: Mucosal infections and granulation tissue formation occurred in seven patients 10% in the early postoperative period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Revision surgery was per­ formed in four patients 7.1% due to residual cholesteatoma within a five-year follow-up.Conclusion: The height of the facial ridge was found as the most important factor related to a successful outcome of open-technique procedures.Other factors included the creation of a smooth mastoid cavity with round edges, removal of ali diseased mastoid cells, and an extensive conchameatoplasty.
🔬Design:Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cholesteatoma · middle ear/surgery/complications · otitis media with effusion/surgery

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the factors that have considerable significance on the outcome of open cavi- ty procedures in the treatment of cholesteatoma.Patients and Methods: The study included 66 patients 43 males, 23 females; mean age 47 years; range 21 to 69 years who underwent surgery for cholesteatoma. Of these, 56 patients completed at least a five-year follow-up.Results: Mucosal infections and granulation tissue formation occurred in seven patients 10% in the early postoperative period. Retraction pockets devel- oped in three patients 4% ; of these, only one patient required excision because of deep localization. Drum perforations that occurred in two patients 3% were repaired by myringoplasty. Revision surgery was per­ formed in four patients 7.1% due to residual cholesteatoma within a five-year follow-up.Conclusion: The height of the facial ridge was found as the most important factor related to a successful outcome of open-technique procedures.Other factors included the creation of a smooth mastoid cavity with round edges, removal of ali diseased mastoid cells, and an extensive conchameatoplasty.

Özet

Amaç: Çalıflmamızda, kolesteatom tedavisinde uygulanan açık teknik ameliyatlarında baflarıyı etkileyen faktörler arafltırıldı. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Kolesteatom nedeniyleaçık teknik uygulanan 66 hastaya ait uzun dönemli sonuçlar değerlendirildi. Bunların 56’sı befl yıllık düzenli takibi tamamlamıfl hastalardı. Bulgul a r : Ameliyat sonrası erken dönemde yedihastada %10 granülasyon dokusu ve mukozal enfeksiyon görüldü. Üç hastada %4 retraksiyon cebiolufltu; ancak bunların sadece birinde eksizyon gerekti. İki hastada %3 ameliyat sonrası dönemdezarda oluflan perforasyon miringoplasti yapılarakkapatıldı. Befl yıllık takip süresince dört hastada %7.1 rezidü kolesteatom nedeniyle revizyon cerrahisi yapıldı. Son u ç : Açık teknikte ameliyat baflarısını etkileyen enönemli faktörün fasyal tümsek yüksekliği olduğu sonucuna varıldı. Kenarları keskin olmayan düzgün yüzeyli mastoid kavite oluflturma, tüm hastalıklı hücrelerin temizlenmesi, genifl konkameatoplasti oluflturmabaflarıyı etkileyen diğer faktörler olarak belirlendi

🔖

Cite This Article

Özgirgin, O. N., Aydın, E., Özlüoğlu, L. N., Özçelik, T. (2003). Factors that affect the outcome of open-technique procedures performed in the treatment of cholesteatoma. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1330194

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Babighian G. Posterior and attic wall osteoplasty: hear- ing results and recurrence rates in cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:14-7.
  2. Huttenbrink KB. Surgical treatment of chronic otitis media. I: Indications, preoperative care and surgical principles. HNO 1994;42:582-93. [Abstract]
  3. Cura O. Orta kulak mikrocerrahisinde değer taflıyan pratik özellikler. Türk Otolarengoloji Arflivi 2002;40: 125-36.
  4. Caylan R, Sanna M. Meatoplasty technique in canal wall down pro c e d u res. [Article in Turkish] Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 1997;7:137-40.
  5. Koyuncu M, Tekat A, fieflen T, Tanyeri Y, Ünal R, Elhami AR. Techniques in cholesteatoma surgery and our results. Türk Otolarengoloji Arflivi 1998;36:77-81.
  6. Kanlikama M, Mumbuc S, Segmen M. Canal wall-down t y m p a n o p l a s t y. [Article in Turkish] Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 1999;6:183-6.
  7. Kalcıoğlu MT, Öncel S, Akdafl D, Çokkeser Y, Miman MC, Erdem T ve ark. Açık kavite timpanoplasti erken dönem sonuçlarımız. Otoskop 2002;2:70-4.
  8. Wormald PJ, Nilssen EL. The facial ridge and the dis- c h a rging mastoid cavity. Laryngoscope 1998;108(1 Pt 1): 9 2 - 6.
  9. Taibah A, Russo A, Çaylan R, Landolfi M, Mancini F, Sanna M. Canal wall down pro c e d u re: causes of failure and pitfalls. In: Sanna M, editor. Cholesteatoma and mastoid surg e r y. Rome: CIC Edizioni Internazionali; 1997. p. 736-42.
  10. Falcioni M, De Donato G, Landolfi M, Ferrara S, Çaylan R, Taibah A, et al. The modified Bondy tech- nique in the treatment of epitympanic cholesteatoma. In: Sanna M, editor. Cholesteatoma and mastoid surg e r y. Rome: CIC Edizioni Internazionali; 1997. p. 676-9.
  11. Mutlu C, Saleh E, Sanna M, Karmarkar S, Bhatia S. Ko- lesteatom tedavisi. Bireye uygun teknik seçim. Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Bafl Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi 1995; 3:196-201.
  12. van Hasselt CA. Toynbee Memorial Lecture 1994: mas- toid surgery and the Hong Kong Flap. J Laryngol Otol 1994;108:825-33.
  13. Portmann M, Portmann D. Management of open and closed cavities in otology. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 1990;111:181-3. [Abstract]
  14. Gorur K, Ozcan C, Unal M, Vayisoglu Y. Causes of fail- ure in open cavity mastoidectomy. [Article in Turkish] Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2002;9:179-83.
  15. Duckert LG, Makielski KH, Helms J. Management of anterior epitympanic cholesteatoma: expectations after epitympanic approach and canal wall reconstruc- tion. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:8-13.
  16. Palva T. Treatment of cholesteatoma. Factors aff e c t i n g cholesteatoma removal. In: Tos M, Thomsen J, Peitersen E, editors. Proceedings of the Third International C o n f e rence on Cholesteatoma and Mastoid Surg e r y. A m s t e rdam: Kugler & Ghedini Publications; 1989. p. 9 11 - 2 0.
  17. Black B. Mastoidectomy elimination: obliterate, recon- struct, or ablate? Am J Otol 1998;19:551-7.
  18. Wormald PJ, Nilssen EL. The facial ridge and the dis- c h a rging mastoid cavity. Laryngoscope 1998;108(1 Pt 1): 9 2 - 6.
  19. Palva T. Treatment of cholesteatoma. Factors aff e c t i n g cholesteatoma removal. In: Tos M, Thomsen J, Peitersen E, editors. Proceedings of the Third International C o n f e rence on Cholesteatoma and Mastoid Surg e r y. A m s t e rdam: Kugler & Ghedini Publications; 1989. p. 9 11 - 2 0.