SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat / 2026 / Volume: 35 Issue: 3

Metabolic Imaging of Sinonasal Lesions: Diagnostic Value of F18-FDG PET/CT in a Retrospective Cohort

Emine Göknur Işık(İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine)0000-0002-3786-8052
Dilşat Fırat Arslan(İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine)0000-0003-3133-3134
Doğu Vurallı Bakkaloğlu(İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology)0000-0002-7671-0100
Cömert Şen(İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology)0000-0002-5101-8599
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-09-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No meaningful correlation could be established between the PET-derived parameters and overall survival in the study cohort.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the diagnostic value of F18-FDG PET/CT in distinguishing benign from malignant sinonasal lesions and, to examine its association with histological subtypes, metastatic spread, and clinical outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: This study retrospectively analysed a cohort of 64 individuals (43 males and 21 females; average age: 52.2 years) who had histopathologically confirmed sinonasal lesions and underwent F18-FDG PET/CT imaging.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No meaningful correlation could be established between the PET-derived parameters and overall survival in the study cohort.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Head and neck neoplasms · sinonasal tumours · F18-FDG PET/CT

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the diagnostic value of F18-FDG PET/CT in distinguishing benign from malignant sinonasal lesions and, to examine its association with histological subtypes, metastatic spread, and clinical outcomes. Material and Methods: This study retrospectively analysed a cohort of 64 individuals (43 males and 21 females; average age: 52.2 years) who had histopathologically confirmed sinonasal lesions and underwent F18-FDG PET/CT imaging. The quantitative assessment included the measurement of SUVmax, MTV (metabolic tumour volume), and TLG (total lesion glycolysis). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the most appropriate threshold values for the diagnostic parameters. The relationships between the PET/CT f indings and the metastatic status, as well as the clinical outcomes, were assessed. Information regarding lymph node involvement, distant dissemination, and patient outcomes was systematically documented. Results: Of the 67 PET/CT scans, 57 (89.1%) were malignant. A higher mean SUVmax was observed in the malignant lesions relative to the benign counterparts (18.34 vs. 10.83), demonstrating moderate accuracy for malignancy detection, as reflected by an AUC of 0.708 (p=0.076). The optimal SUVmax cut-off (9.47) yielded 57.1% specificity and 82.5% sensitivity (AUC: 0.708; 95% CI: 0.464–0.925). MTV and TLG showed limited discriminatory power. PET/CT detected distant metastases and regional lymph nodes in 52.6% of the malignant cases, influencing treatment decisions. No meaningful correlation could be established between the PET-derived parameters and overall survival in the study cohort. Conclusion: F18-FDG PET/CT provides moderate diagnostic accuracy in sinonasal lesions, with SUVmax being the most informative parameter. Its greatest clinical value lies in the staging and detection of metastatic disease, supporting its use as a complementary imaging modality in sinonasal tumour management. The findings highlight the value of incorporating PET/CT into the initial staging process for sinonasal tumours to enhance therapeutic decision-making.

🔖

Cite This Article

Işık, E. G., Arslan, D. F., Bakkaloğlu, D. V., Şen, C. (2025). Metabolic Imaging of Sinonasal Lesions: Diagnostic Value of F18-FDG PET/CT in a Retrospective Cohort. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, Volume: 35 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.26650/Tr-ENT.2025.1705685

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Bracigliano A, Tatangelo F, Perri F, Di Lorenzo G, Tafuto R, Ottaiano A, et al. Malignant sinonasal tumors: update on histological and clinical management. Curr Oncol 2021;28(4):2420-38. google scholar
  2. Quan H, Yan L, Zhang H, Zou L, Yuan W, Wang S. Development and validation of a nomogram for prognosis of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019;9(9):1030-40. google scholar
  3. Raghavan P, Phillips CD. Magnetic resonance imaging of sinonasal malignancies. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2007;18(4):259-67. google scholar
  4. Haerle SK, Gullane PJ, Witterick IJ, Zweifel C, Gentili F. Sinonasal carcinomas: epidemiology, pathology, and management. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2013;24(1):39-49. google scholar
  5. Sen S, Chandra A, Mukhopadhyay S, Ghosh P. Imaging approach to sinonasal neoplasms. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2015;25(4):577-93. google scholar
  6. Griffeth LK. Use of PET/CT scanning in cancer patients: technical and practical considerations. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2005;18(4):321-30. google scholar
  7. Özel HE. Use of PET in head and neck cancers. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;53(2):73-6. google scholar
  8. Purohit BS, Ailianou A, Dulguerov N, Becker CD, Ratib O, Becker M. FDG-PET/CT pitfalls in oncological head and neck imaging. Insights Imaging 2014;5(5):585-602. google scholar
  9. Kawaguchi M, Kato H, Tomita H, Mizuta K, Aoki M, Hara A, et al. Imaging characteristics of malignant sinonasal tumors. J Clin Med 2017;6(12):116. google scholar
  10. Meerwein CM, Maurer A, Stolzmann P, Stadler TM, Soyka MB, Holzmann D, et al. Hybrid positron emission tomography imaging for initial staging of sinonasal tumors: Total lesion glycolysis as prognosticator of treatment response. Head Neck 2021;43(1):238-46. google scholar
  11. Hines JP, Howard BE, Hoxworth JM, Lal D. Positive and negative predictive value of PET-CT in skull base lesions: case series and systematic literature review. J Neurol Surg Rep 2016;77(1):e39-45. google scholar
  12. Lamarre ED, Batra PS, Lorenz RR, Citardi MJ, Adelstein DJ, Srinivas SM, et al. Role of positron emission tomography in management of sinonasal neoplasms–a single institution's experience. Am J Otolaryngol 2012;33(3):289-95. google scholar
  13. Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;42(2):328-54. google scholar
  14. Ozturk K, Gencturk M, Caicedo-Granados E, Li F, Cayci Z. Utility of FDG PET/CT in the characterization of sinonasal neoplasms: analysis of standardized uptake value parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;211(6):1354-60. google scholar
  15. Felix-Ravelo M, Bey A, Arous F, Paris-Grandpierre S, Jankowski R, Nguyen DT. Relationship between ¹⁸FDG-PET and different types of sinonasal malignancies. Acta Otolaryngol 2017;137(2):191-5. google scholar
  16. Dondi F, Pasinetti N, Guerini A, Piazza C, Mattavelli D, Bossi P, et al. Prognostic role of baseline ¹⁸F-FDG pet/CT in squamous cell carcinoma of the paranasal sinuses. Head Neck 2022;44(11):2395-406. google scholar
  17. Kim BS, Pak K, Yi KI, Kim IJ, Roh HJ, Cho KS. Prognostic value of tumoral heterogeneity and volumetric parameters as measured by F18-FDG PET/CT in sinonasal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274(3):1437-43. google scholar
  18. Lesperance MM, Esclamado RM. Squamous cell carcinoma arising in inverted papilloma. Laryngoscope 1995;105(2):178-83. google scholar
  19. Barnes L. Schneiderian papillomas and nonsalivary glandular neoplasms of the head and neck. Mod Pathol 2002;15(3):279-97. google scholar
  20. Ozturk K, Gencturk M, Rischall M, Caicedo-Granados E, Li F, Cayci Z. Role of whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in screening for metastases in newly diagnosed sinonasal malignancies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019;212(6):1327-34. google scholar
  21. Ramakrishnan VR, Lee JY, O'Malley BW, Jr., Palmer JN, Chiu AG. 18-FDG-PET in the initial staging of sinonasal malignancy. Laryngoscope 2013;123(12):2962-6. google scholar
  22. El-Adem D, Yang N, Gudis DA. The role of positron emission tomography for the management of sinonasal malignancies: a systematic review. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2023;37(5):593-610. google scholar