SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat / 2025 / Volume: 35 Issue: 4

Auditory-Perceptual Voice Quality, Self-Perceived Voice Handicap, and Vocal Fatigue in Street Vendors

Namık Yücel Birol(CAPPADOCIA UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7155-3591
Ferhat Alkan(TARSUS UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2450-0213
Zübeyir Tutuş(ISTINYE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-9092-7728
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-01-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Preventive measures, including vocal health education and workplace interventions, are essential for reducing these risks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In rural labour sectors, individuals who rely heavily on their voices—such as street vendors— are at increased risk of developing voice disorders due to prolonged voice use in noisy environments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 street vendors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Preventive measures, including vocal health education and workplace interventions, are essential for reducing these risks.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Voice disorders · Fatigue · Self-assessment

Abstract

Objective: In rural labour sectors, individuals who rely heavily on their voices—such as street vendors— are at increased risk of developing voice disorders due to prolonged voice use in noisy environments. Understanding their vocal health needs is essential for developing targeted voice therapy interventions within rural rehabilitation frameworks. This study investigates the auditory-perceptual voice quality, self perceived voice handicap, and vocal fatigue among street vendors in the Cappadocia region, Türkiye. Material and Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 street vendors. Data collection involved the GRBAS scale for perceptual voice evaluation, the Turkish versions of the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10-TR), and the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI-TR). Non-parametric tests were used for the statistical analysis. Results: Voice problems were reported by 40% of the participants. Significant differences were observed in the GRBAS scores, with higher impairments in grade, breathiness, asthenia, and strain among those with voice problems. Participants with voice issues also scored significantly higher on the VHI-10-TR and VFI-TR, indicating a greater voice-related handicap and vocal fatigue. A moderate positive correlation was found between the VHI-10-TR and VFI-TR scores. Conclusion: Street vendors in Cappadocia face significant vocal challenges due to occupational voice use, with notable impacts on perceptual voice quality, vocal fatigue, and quality of life. Preventive measures, including vocal health education and workplace interventions, are essential for reducing these risks.

🔖

Cite This Article

Birol, N. Y., Alkan, F., Tutuş, Z. (2026). Auditory-Perceptual Voice Quality, Self-Perceived Voice Handicap, and Vocal Fatigue in Street Vendors. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, Volume: 35 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.26650/Tr-ENT.2025.1735624

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Titze IR. Principles of Voice Production. 2nd ed. Iowa, IA: National Center for Voice and Speech; 2000.google scholar
  2. Roy N, Merrill RM, Thibeault S, Parsa RA, Gray SD, Smith EM. Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004;47(2):281-93. google scholar
  3. Devadas U, Rajashekhar B. The prevalence and impact of voice problems in call center operators. J Laryngol Voice 2013;3(1):3-9. google scholar
  4. Pestana PM, Vaz-Freitas S, Manso MC. Prevalence of voice disorders in singers: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Voice 2017;31(6):722-7. google scholar
  5. Boominathan P, Rajendran A, Nagarajan R, Seethapathy J, Gnanasekar M. Vocal abuse and vocal hygiene practices among different level professional voice users in India: A survey. Asia Pac J Speech Lang Hear 2008;11(1):47-53. google scholar
  6. Cantor-Cutiva LC. Association between occupational voice use and occurrence of voice disorders: Voice disorders and work. Areté 2018;18(2):1-10. google scholar
  7. Sapir S, Keidar A, Mathers-Schmidt B. Vocal attrition in teachers: survey findings. Eur J Disord Commun 1993;28(2):177-85. google scholar
  8. Verdolini K, Ramig LO. Review: occupational risks for voice problems. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2001;26(1):37-46. google scholar
  9. McDowell S, Morrison R, Mau T, Shembel AC. Clinical characteristics and effects of vocal demands in occupational voice users with and without primary muscle tension dysphonia. J Voice 2025;39(2):448-56.google scholar
  10. Shaiara H, Shanjida Y, Shahidul I. Assessment of the socioeconomic aspects of street vendors in Dhaka City: Evidence from Bangladesh. Asian Soc Sci 2015;12(26):1-10. google scholar
  11. Stemple JC, Roy N, Klaben B. Clinical voice pathology: theory and management. 6th ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2020. google scholar
  12. Paul A, Kumaraswamy S. Vocal hygiene awareness in street vendors. Int J Innov Res Technol 2022;9(3):190-4.google scholar
  13. Upadhyay PK, Sharma V, Srinivasan S, Gupta MK, Goyal A. Knowledge, attitude and practice on vocal abuse and vocal hygiene among diverse occupational voice users in Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024;76(4):3338-44.google scholar
  14. Mund SP, Suvarna AP, Banik AA. Prevalence of voice problems among hawkers in Mumbai. J Otorhinolaryngol Allied Sci 2019;2(1):8-15. google scholar
  15. Natour YS, Darawsheh WB, Bashiti S, Wari M, Taha J, Odeh T. A study of VHI scores and acoustic features in street vendors as occupational voice users. J Commun Disord 2018;71:11-21. google scholar
  16. Titze IR, Lemke J, Montequin D. Populations in the U.S. workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade: a preliminary report. J Voice 1997;11(3):254-9.google scholar
  17. Hirano M. Clinical Examination of Voice. Vienna: Springer-Verlag; 1981. p. 81-4. google scholar
  18. Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit A, Jacobson G, Benninger MS, et al. The voice handicap index (VHI): Development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;6(3):66-70. google scholar
  19. Kılıç MA, Okur E, Yıldırım İ, Öğüt F, Denizoğlu İİ, Kızılay A, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Voice Handicap Index. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat 2008;18(3):139-47. google scholar
  20. Nanjundeswaran C, Jacobson BH, Gartner-Schmidt J, Verdolini Abbott K. vocal Fatigue Index (VFI): Development and validation. J Voice 2015;29(4):433-40. google scholar
  21. Sirin S, Ogut MF, Bilgen C. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index. Turk J Med Sci 2020;50(4):902-9. google scholar
  22. Kılıç MA. Objektif Ses Analizi. In: Özüdoğru EN, editor. Ses Bozukluklarına Güncel Yaklaşım. 1st ed. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2019. p. 33-9. google scholar
  23. Awan SN, Shaikh MA, Awan JA, Abdalla I, Lim KO, Misono S. Smartphone recordings are comparable to “Gold Standard” recordings for acoustic measurements of voice. J Voice 2025;39(4):1019-32.google scholar
  24. The jamovi project. Open statistical software for the desktop and cloud. jamovi (Version 2.6) 03/07/2025. https://www.jamovi.org. google scholar
  25. R Core Team. The comprehensive R archive network R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R foundation for statistical computing,2024. 03/07/2025 https://www.cran.r-project.org google scholar
  26. Dancey CP, Reidy J. Statistics without maths for psychology. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2007. google scholar
  27. Huston MN, Puka I, Naunheim MR. Prevalence of Voice Disorders in the United States: A National Survey. Laryngoscope 2024;134(1):347-52. google scholar
  28. Vilkman E. Occupational safety and health aspects of voice and speech professions. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 2004;56(4):220-53. google scholar