Journals / Yükseköğretim Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Reengineering Higher Education

Yükseköğretimde değişim mühendisliği

Pages
48–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article concludes with a summary of necessary conditions of a futuristic university.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Several articles and books have been written about the reengineering revolution in the business world, including the seminal book by Hammer and Champy (1993).
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article uses their book as a basis to explain the changes necessary to reengineer a higher education institution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article concludes with a summary of necessary conditions of a futuristic university.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Değişim mühendisliği · üniversitelerin organizasyon yapısı · yükseköğretim.

Abstract

Several articles and books have been written about the reengineering revolution in the business world, including the seminal book by Hammer and Champy (1993). This article uses their book as a basis to explain the changes necessary to reengineer a higher education institution. First, the article explains what a reengineered university will look like. Then, it lists the required changes. The article concludes with a summary of necessary conditions of a futuristic university.

Özet

İş dünyasında değişim mühendisliği devrimi hakkında Hammer ve Champynin orijinal kitabı (1993) ile birlikte birçok makale ve kitap yazılmıştır. Bu yazı bir yükseköğretim kurumunda değişim mühendisliği uygulaması için gereken değişiklikleri açıklamak için Hammer ve Champynin kitabını esas almaktadır. İlk olarak, makale değişim mühendisliği uygulanan bir üniversitenin nasıl olması gerektiği açıklamaktadır. Daha sonra, olması gereken değişimler listelenmektedir. Yazı geleceğin üniversitesi için gereken şartların bir özeti ile sonuçlanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNÇ, E. A. (2013). Reengineering Higher Education. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 48–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/132792

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adenzo-Diaz, B., and Cantelli, A. F. (2001). Business process reengineer- ing and university organisation: A normative approach from the Spanish case. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23(1), 63-73.
  2. Allen, D. K., and Fifield, N. (1999). Re-engineering change in higher edu- cation. Information Research, 4(3). Alho, J. M., and Salo M. A. (2000). Merit-rating and formula-based resource allocation. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(3), 95-100.
  3. Barnett, R. (2011). The idea of the university in the Twenty-First Century. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 1(2), 88-94.
  4. Calantone, R. J., Yeniyurt, S., Townsend, J. D., and Schmidt, J. B. (2010). Life-cycle markets: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(3), 349-361.
  5. Davies, B. (1996). Re-engineering school leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 10(2), 11-16.
  6. Hammer, M., and Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A man- ifesto for business revolution. New Rork, NY: HarperCollins Publishers,
  7. Inc. Li, Heng, (1998). Information-technology-based tools for reengineering construction engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 6(1), 15-21.
  8. Liang, C. C., Cheng, F., and Wang, E. H. H. (1998). Reengineering uni- versity information services: Yuan Ze University’s experience. CAUSE/ EFFECT, 21(4), 1-12.
  9. Miller, R. I., and Miller, P. M. (1998). Promises and perils of three organ- isational innovations. Higher Education Review, 30(2), 23-28.
  10. Newman, F., Couturier, L., and Scurry, J. (2004). The future of higher edu- cation: Rhetoric, reality, and the risks of the market. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons. Penrod, J. I., and Dolence, M. G. (1991). Concepts for reengineering high- er education. CAUSE/EFFECT, 14(2), 10-17.
  11. Seidman, R. H. (1998). Re-engineering four years of college into three: The makings of a competency-based three year bachelor’s degree. American Educational Research Association, Annual Meeting 1998,
  12. San Diego, CA. Weller, D. L. (1998) Unlocking the culture for quality schools: Reengineering. International Journal of Educational Management, 12(6), 250-259.
  13. Wiendahl, H. P., and Heger, C. L. (2011). Justifying changeability. A methodical approach to achieving cost effectiveness. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Production, 6(1-2), 33-40.