Journals / Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory / 2024 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4

Attitudes towards cancer of parents admitted to the emergency department with a sick child: A Cross-sectional study

Hasta bir çocukla acil servise başvuran ebeveynlerin kansere karşı tutumları: Kesitsel bir çalışma

Ferhat Günerigök(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HAMİDİYE SAĞLIK HİZMETLERİ MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU (İSTANBUL))0000-0001-5889-3524
Muhammet Ali Varkal(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP PR.)0000-0002-2564-8298
Pages
554–561
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall score for "the scale was found to be 3.2 points.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Parents' perspectives change when it comes to illnesses such as cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Scores of 2.5 and above indicate negative attitudes towards cancer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall score for "the scale was found to be 3.2 points.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kanser · ebeveyn · sosyal davranış

Abstract

Aim: Parents' perspectives change when it comes to illnesses such as cancer. Parents find it stressful, especially given what society thinks and believes. The aim of this study is to determine how parents with a sick child feel about cancer. Material and Methods: The descriptive and cross-sectional study was completed with parents who presented to the pediatric emergency department of a hospital. The Measuring Attitudes Towards Cancer Questionnaire—Society Version and the Sociodemographic Information Form for parents and their children were used to gather the information. Scores of 2.5 and above indicate negative attitudes towards cancer. The statistical program was used to analyze the gathered information. Results: The study was completed with 83 parents. There was no family history of cancer in 84.3% of them. The overall score for "the scale was found to be 3.2 points. In addition, 3.1 points were obtained from the impossibility of healing, 3.4 from the discrimination sub-dimension, and 3.1 from the cancer diagnosis and spread sub-dimension. A statistically significant difference was found between the total and all sub-dimensions of the scale and the number of previous hospitalizations, maternal age, paternal age, and maternal employment status (p<0.05). There was a significant difference between economic status and the sub-dimension of revealing or disseminating the cancer diagnosis (p=0.04). A significant difference was found between the way of perceiving religion and the impossibility of recovery sub-dimension (p=0.02) and the scale total score (p=0.03). Conclusion: The findings indicate that parents have negative perceptions of cancer. Individual characteristics are proven to affect attitudes.

Özet

Amaç: Kanser gibi hastalıklara karşı ebeveynlerin bakış açısı değişmektedir. Özellikle toplumun düşünceleri ve inanışları göz önüne alındığında ebeveynler bunu stresli buluyor. Bu çalışmanın amacı hasta çocuğu olan ebeveynlerin kansere ilişkin neler hissettiklerini belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel nitelikteki çalışma bir hastanenin çocuk acil servisine başvuran ebeveynlerle tamamlandı. Bilgi toplamak için Kansere Yönelik Tutumları Ölçme Anketi - Toplum Versiyonu ve ebeveynler ve çocuklarına yönelik Sosyodemografik Bilgi Formu kullanıldı. 2,5 ve üzeri puanlar kansere yönelik olumsuz tutuma işaret etmektedir. Toplanan bilgileri analiz etmek için istatistik programı kullanıldı. Bulgular: Araştırma 83 ebeveyn ile tamamlandı. Bunların %84,3'ünün ailesinde kanser öyküsü yoktu. Ölçeğin genel puanı 3,2 puan olarak belirlendi. Ayrıca iyileşmenin imkansızlığı alt boyutundan 3,1, ayırt etme alt boyutundan 3,4, kanser tanısı ve yayılması alt boyutundan ise 3,1 puan elde edildi. Ölçeğin toplam ve tüm alt boyutları ile daha önce hastaneye yatış sayısı, anne yaşı, baba yaşı ve annenin çalışma durumu arasında fark bulundu (p<0,05). ekonomik durum ile kanser tanısını açıklama veya yayma alt boyutu arasında anlamlı farklılık (p=0,04) ile dini algılama şekli ve iyileşmenin imkansızlığı alt boyutu (p=0,02) ile ölçek arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur. toplam puan (p=0,03). Sonuç: Bulgular ebeveynlerin kansere ilişkin olumsuz algılara sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Bireysel özelliklerin tutumları etkilediği kanıtlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şimşek, A., Günerigök, F., Varkal, M. A. (2024). Attitudes towards cancer of parents admitted to the emergency department with a sick child: A Cross-sectional study. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4, 554–561. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1543065

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Kuralay C, Ayyildiz NI, Evcimen H. Determination of attitudes of individuals participating in cancer activity towards cancer. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences 2021; 24(4): 531- 538. (doi: 10.17049/ataunihem.780825)
  2. Ozturk A, Doganer A, Bal Z. Evaluating the stigmatization attitudes toward cancer and cancer patients. Int. J. Soc. Sci. 2019; 5(44): 5038-5047 (http://dx.doi.org/10.26449/sssj.1748)
  3. Yildiz E, Dedeli Caydam O. Systematic review: A systematic analysis of research related to stigmatization towards patients with cancer. Health and Community 2020; 20(1): 9-25.
  4. Pozo Muñoz C, Bretones Nieto B, Vázquez López MÁ. When Your Child Has Cancer: A path analysis model to show the relationships between flourishing and health in parents of children with cancer. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021; 1812587. (https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312587)
  5. Sezgin S, Ekinci M. Comparing depression levels of the children with cancer and healthy children. Ondokuz Mayıs University Medical Journal 2006; 23(2): 52–58.
  6. Camli N. The relationship between stigma, psychiatric morbidity, and post-traumatic growth in breast cancer patients. Master’s thesis, Pamukkale University, Denizli; 2019.
  7. Ozmen S, Erdem R. Conceptual framework of the stigmatization. Suleyman Demirel University the Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences 2018; 23(1): 185-208.
  8. Yilmaz M, Dissiz G, Gocmen F. The Study Turkish version of validation and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring attitudes toward cancer (Cancer stigma)- Community version. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences. 2017; 20: 2.
  9. Ay R. Epilepsy and Stigmatization: A review. Turkish J Clinical Psychiatry. 2017; 20: 129-136. (doi: 10.5505/kpd.2017.47965)
  10. Shattnawi KK, Okour H, Alnatour A. Caring for a child with cancer: experiences of jordanian mothers. Clin. Nurs. Res. 2021; 30(8): 1144–1152. (doi: 10.1177/10547738211002021)
  11. Pyszkowska A, Rożnawski K, Farny Z. Self-stigma, and cognitive fusion in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: The moderating role of self-compassion. Peer J 2021; 9: e12591. (doi: 10.7717/peerj.12591)
  12. Serchuk MD, Corrigan PW, Reed S. Vicarious stigma, and self- stigma experienced by parents of children with mental health and/or neurodevelopmental disorders community. Community Ment Health J. 2021; 57: 1537–1546. (https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10597-021-00774-0)
  13. Liu H, Yang Q, Narsavage GL. Coping with stigma: the experiences of Chinese patients living with lung cancer. Springer Plus 2016; 5: 1790. (doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3486-5)
  14. Cho J, Choi EK, Kim SY. Association between cancer stigma and depression among cancer survivors: A nationwide survey in Korea. Psychosoc. Oncol. 2013; 22(10): 2372-2378. (doi: 10.1002/ pon.3302).
  15. Estapéa T, Carrion IV, Estapéa J. Exploring the knowledge and attitudes about cancer of older adults in Barcelona, Spain. J. Psychosoc. Oncol. 2020; 1(e16): 1-5. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ OR9.0000000000000016)
  16. Acikgoz A, Cehreli R, Ellidokuz H. Women's knowledge and attitudes on cancer and their behavior towards early diagnostic methods. Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine 2011; 25(3): 145-54.
  17. Kayama M, Haight W. Balancing the stigmatization risks of disability labels against the benefits of special education: Japanese parents' perceptions. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2018; 43– 53. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.04.008)
  18. Fujisawa D, Hagiwara N. Cancer stigma and its health consequences. Curr. Breast Cancer Rep. 2015; 7: 143–150. (doi: 10.1007/s12609-015-0185-0)
  19. Ongtengco N, Thiam H, Collins Z. Role of gender in perspectives of discrimination, stigma, and attitudes relative to cervical cancer in rural Senegal. PLoS ONE 2020; 15(4): e0232291. (https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232291)
  20. Badihian S, Choi EK, Kim IR. Attitudes toward cancer and cancer patients in an urban Iranian population. The Oncologist. 2017; 22(8): 944. (doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0073)
  21. Al-Azri M, Al-Hattali F, Al-Ghafri H. Attitudes Towards Cancer Patients: A cross-sectional study of Omani patients and attendees at a university teaching hospital. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J. 2021; 21(2): e221-e30. (doi: 10.18295/squmj.2021.21.02.010)
  22. Kim MA, Yi J. Life after cancer: How does public stigma increase psychological distress of childhood cancer survivors? Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2014; 1605–1614. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ijnurstu.2014.04.005)
  23. Cinar S, Boztepe H, Ay A. Predictors of parenting stress in parents of children with cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021; 102022. (https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102022)
  24. Kaya A, Eke E, Aba G. Individuals’ perceptions of cancer disease. Current Perspectives in Social Sciences 2022; 26(2): 179-191. (doi: 10.5152/JSSI.2022.547727)