Journals / Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2

Evaluation of interpeduncular angle values according to age and gender by magnetic resonance imaging

Manyetik Rezonans Görüntüleme ile Yaşa ve Cinsiyete Göre İnterpedünküler Açı Değerlerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Nazire Kılıç Şafak(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-1521-5437
Hüseyin Erdem(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-7746-7464
Yusuf Kemal Arslan(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1308-8569
Sibel Tepecik(Yüreğir Devlet Hastanesi)0009-0000-7036-748X
Zekiye Karaca Bozdağ(İSTANBUL YENİ YÜZYIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4969-654X
Danış Aygün(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6165-3422
Neslihan Boyan(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9524-9535
Özkan Oğuz(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3081-1467
Pages
386–393
Publication Date
2025-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings provide normative, age- and sex-stratified reference data for brainstem angular measurements, which may enhance their utility in clinical diagnostics, especially in conditions such as spontaneous intracranial hypotension and neurodegenerative syndromes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aimed to establish normative, age- and sex-stratified reference values for the interpeduncular angle (IPA), pontomesencephalic angle (PMA), and pontomedullary angle using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a healthy adult population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 290 healthy adult patients (124 males, 166 females; mean age: 43.1 ± 16.7 years) who underwent brain MRI between January 2018 and December 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings provide normative, age- and sex-stratified reference data for brainstem angular measurements, which may enhance their utility in clinical diagnostics, especially in conditions such as spontaneous intracranial hypotension and neurodegenerative syndromes.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:interpedinküler açı · pontomesensefalik açı · pontomedüller açı

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to establish normative, age- and sex-stratified reference values for the interpeduncular angle (IPA), pontomesencephalic angle (PMA), and pontomedullary angle using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a healthy adult population. Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 290 healthy adult patients (124 males, 166 females; mean age: 43.1 ± 16.7 years) who underwent brain MRI between January 2018 and December 2020. IPA, PMA, and pontomedullary angles were measured on standardized axial and mid-sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo MRI sequences. The classification was as follows: 18–24 years (young adults), 25–33 years (adults), 34–48 years (early middle-aged), 49–64 years (middle-aged), ≥65 years (elderly). Results: The mean IPA was 75.5° ± 10.2, PMA was 57.0° ± 10.2, and pontomedullary angle was 133.8° ± 10.6. No significant differences in any angular measurements were observed between male and female (p > 0.05). However, a significant increase in IPA values was observed with advancing age (p < 0.001), particularly in middle-aged and elderly groups. IPA showed a moderate positive correlation with age (r = 0.372; p < 0.001), while PMA and pontomedullary angle showed no significant correlation with age. No significant correlations were found among the three angular parameters. Conclusion: IPA values increase significantly with age, whereas PMA and pontomedullary angles remain relatively stable throughout adulthood. These findings provide normative, age- and sex-stratified reference data for brainstem angular measurements, which may enhance their utility in clinical diagnostics, especially in conditions such as spontaneous intracranial hypotension and neurodegenerative syndromes.

Özet

Bu çalışma, sağlıklı yetişkin bir popülasyonda manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRI) kullanarak interpedünküler açı (IPA), pontomesensefalik açı (PMA) ve pontomedüller açı için normatif, yaşa ve cinsiyete göre tabakalandırılmış referans değerleri belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmaya Ocak 2018 ile Aralık 2020 arasında beyin MRI'ı çekilen 290 sağlıklı yetişkin hasta (124 erkek, 166 kadın; ortalama yaş: 43,1 ± 16,7 yıl) dahil edildi. IPA, PMA ve pontomedüller açılar, standartlaştırılmış aksiyel ve orta sagital T1 ağırlıklı spin-eko MRI dizilerinde ölçüldü. Sınıflandırma şu şekildeydi: 18-24 yaş (genç yetişkinler), 25-33 yaş (yetişkinler), 34-48 yaş (erken orta yaşlı), 49-64 yaş (orta yaşlı), ≥65 yaş (yaşlı). Sonuçlar: Ortalama IPA 75,5° ± 10,2, PMA 57,0° ± 10,2 ve pontomedüller açı 133,8° ± 10,6 idi. Erkek ve kadınlar arasında herhangi bir açısal ölçümde anlamlı bir fark gözlenmedi (p > 0,05). Ancak, özellikle orta yaşlı ve yaşlı gruplarında, ilerleyen yaşla birlikte IPA değerlerinde anlamlı bir artış gözlendi (p < 0,001). IPA yaşla orta düzeyde pozitif bir korelasyon gösterdi (r = 0,372; p < 0,001), PMA ve pontomedüller açı ise yaşla anlamlı bir korelasyon göstermedi. Üç açısal parametre arasında anlamlı bir korelasyon bulunamadı. Sonuç: IPA değerleri yaşla birlikte önemli ölçüde artarken, PMA ve pontomedüller açılar yetişkinlik boyunca nispeten sabit kaldı. Bu bulgular, beyin sapı açısal ölçümleri için normatif, yaşa ve cinsiyete göre sınıflandırılmış referans verileri sağlar ve bu da klinik tanılamada, özellikle spontan intrakraniyal hipotansiyon ve nörodejeneratif sendromlar gibi durumlarda, bunların kullanımını artırabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şafak, N. K., Erdem, H., Arslan, Y. K., Tepecik, S., Bozdağ, Z. K., Aygün, D., Boyan, N., Oğuz, Ö. (2025). Evaluation of interpeduncular angle values according to age and gender by magnetic resonance imaging. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 386–393. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1718763

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Kim ISY, Balogun OO, Prescott BR et al. Quantitative pupillometry and radiographic markers of intracranial midline shift: A pilot study. Front Neurol 2022;13:1046548.
  2. Urbach H, Fung C, Dovi-Akue P, Lutzen N, Beck J. Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117:480-87.
  3. Pyrgelis ES, Velonakis G, Papageorgiou SG, Stefanis L, Kapaki E, Constantinides VC. Imaging Markers for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: An Overview. Biomedicines. 2023;11: 1265
  4. Volovici V, Varvari I, Dirven CMF, Dammers R. The membrane of Liliequist-a safe haven in the middle of the brain. A narrative review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020;162:2235-44.
  5. Dobrocky T, Grunder L, Breiding PS et al. Assessing Spinal Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension With a Scoring System Based on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:580-87.
  6. Delteil C, Lesieur E, Tuchtan L et al. Study of the growth and shape of the brain and cranial base during the first two years of life. Morphologie 2021;105:45-53.
  7. Wang DJ, Pandey SK, Lee DH, Sharma M. The Interpeduncular Angle: A Practical and Objective Marker for the Detection and Diagnosis of Intracranial Hypotension on Brain MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1299-303.
  8. Debnath J, Sharma V, Patrikar S, Krishna S, Shijith KP, Keshav RR. Normal measurements of brainstem and related structures for all ages: An MRI-based morphometric study. Med J Armed Forces India 2023;79:428-38.
  9. Geifman N, Cohen R, Rubin E. Redefining meaningful age groups in the context of disease. Age (Dordr) 2013;35:2357-66.
  10. Peng Y, Zhu Q, Wang B, Ren J. A cross-sectional study on interference control: age affects reactive control but not proactive control. PeerJ 2020;8:e8365.
  11. Sepulveda F, Quezada F, Montoya F, Sepulveda W. Interpeduncular angle: A new parameter for assessing intracranial hypotension in fetuses with spinal dysraphism. Prenat Diagn 2021;41:942-48.
  12. Fatterpekar GM, Dietrich A, Pantano P, et al. Cerebral Peduncle Angle: An Objective Criterion for Assessing Progressive Supranucler Palsy Richardson Syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:386-91.
  13. Aoun K, Double KL, Pearson-Dennett V, Yilmaz R, Berg D, and Todd G. Measurement of the adult human midbrain with transcranial ultrasound. PLoS One 2021;16:e0247920.
  14. Hu M, Xu F, Liu S et al. Aging pattern of the brainstem based on volumetric measurement and optimized surface shape analysis. Brain Imaging Behav 2024;18:396-411.
  15. Eraslan C, Acarer A, Guneyli S et al. MRI evaluation of progressive supranuclear palsy: differentiation from Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy. Neurol Res 2019;41:110-17.
  16. Ugga L, Cuocolo R, Cocozza S et al. Magnetic resonance parkinsonism indices and interpeduncular angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and progressive supranuclear palsy. Neuroradiology 2020;62:1657-65.
  17. Shah LM, McLean LA, Heilbrun ME, Salzman KL. Intracranial hypotension: improved MRI detection with diagnostic intracranial angles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:400-7.
  18. Demir M, Cinaroglu S, Ceranoglu FG, Cicek F, and Koc T. Investigation of Morphometric Characteristics of the Mesencephalon in a Healthy Turkish Population: An MRI-Based Morphometric Study. Cureus 2023;15:e48708.
  19. B S, Ananthasayanam JR, S S, Mohanakrishnan A, Ramakrishnan KK. Olivopontocerebellar Degeneration in a Young Adult Female: A Case Report of Early Onset and an Uncommon Course. Cureus 2024;16:e69384.