SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Restoration manager: Adapting project delivery methods for the restoration of architectural heritage

Mehmet Emre Aktuna(ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3826-0962
Bekir Eskici(ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELI UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2352-5080
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The essence of this work is to create an appropriate project delivery system that adapts to the nuances of the restoration works, and through this project delivery framework, the restoration processes and outcomes will successfully be completed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The restoration of architectural heritage is a complex process and presents intricate and formidable challenges.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article is produced from the doctoral thesis titled "Development of a Sustainable Integrated Management System for the Conservation of Architectural Heritage", which is in the process of preparation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The essence of this work is to create an appropriate project delivery system that adapts to the nuances of the restoration works, and through this project delivery framework, the restoration processes and outcomes will successfully be completed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Project management · Project delivery methods · Architectural heritage

Abstract

The restoration of architectural heritage is a complex process and presents intricate and formidable challenges. The project delivery method plays a pivotal role for the success of the restoration process. There exists a diverse array of project delivery methods, each characterized by its distinct set of advantages and disadvantages. In the context of architectural heritage restoration, given its distinct characteristics, these advantages and disadvantages encompass a wide spectrum. Current project delivery methods, while effective for certain contexts, often fall short in addressing the unique requisites of restoration projects. Acknowledging this inadequacy, this article undertakes a research that includes a literature review that not only examines prevailing project delivery methods but also articulates the need for a tailored framework within the restoration field. This article is produced from the doctoral thesis titled "Development of a Sustainable Integrated Management System for the Conservation of Architectural Heritage", which is in the process of preparation. In the light of the results of the survey which is conducted within the scope of the first author's doctoral study in order to examine the project delivery approach preferred among the participants that are working in the field of the conservation of architectural heritage, a project delivery method called "Restoration Manager", which has been precisely prepared to meet the requirements inherent in restoration initiatives, is presented. This comprehensive project delivery method seeks to fill the void by addressing the distinct needs and challenges encountered in restoration projects. The essence of this work is to create an appropriate project delivery system that adapts to the nuances of the restoration works, and through this project delivery framework, the restoration processes and outcomes will successfully be completed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aktuna, M. E., Eskici, B. (2024). Restoration manager: Adapting project delivery methods for the restoration of architectural heritage. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Volume: 8 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1386599

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (85)

  1. Antón, A. J. M., Rodríguez, G. S., & López, Á. R. (2011). Financial risks in construction projects. African Journal of Business Management, 5(31), 12325- 12328. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.1463
  2. Oyetunji, A. A., & Anderson, S. D. (2006). Relative effectiveness of project delivery and contract strategies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:1(3)
  3. Azar, E., O'Brien, W., Carlucci, S., Hong, T., Sonta, A., Kim, J.,. & Zhou, J. (2020). Simulation-aided occupant-centric building design: A critical review of tools, methods, and applications. Energy and Buildings, 224, 110292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110292
  4. Hong, H. K., Kim, J. S., Kim, T., & Leem, B. H. (2008). The effect of knowledge on system integration project performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(3), 385-404. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810858787
  5. Ojiako, U., Johansen, E., & Greenwood, D. (2008). A qualitative re‐construction of project measurement criteria. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(3), 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810858796
  6. Ahmed, S., & El-Sayegh, S. (2020). Critical review of the evolution of project delivery methods in the construction industry. Buildings, 11(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010011
  7. Noor, M. I. M., Rahim, F. A. M., & Abd Karim, S. B. (2022). Project Delivery Method for Construction Projects: Review of Malaysian Public Sector Practice. Journal Of Project Management Practice (JPMP), 2(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.22452/jpmp.vol2no1.1
  8. Kubba, S. (2012) Handbook of Green Building Design and Construction. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385128-4.00003-2
  9. Khan, M. A., & Phil, M. (2015). Chapter 3 - Research and Training in ABC Structural Systems. Accelerated Bridge Construction, 103-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407224-4.00003-4
  10. Flanagan, R., & Jewell, C. (2018). Procurement, selection, contractual arrangements and legal issues. New Code of Estimating Practice The Chartered Institute of Building, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119329671.ch7
  11. Rwelamila, P. D., & Edries, R. (2007). Project procurement competence and knowledge base of civil engineering consultants: An empirical study. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(4), 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:4(182)
  12. Franz, B., Molenaar, K. R., & Roberts, B. A. (2020). Revisiting project delivery system performance from 1998 to 2018. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(9), 04020100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.000189
  13. Haugen, A., Wondimu, P. A., Lohne, J., & Lædre, O. (2017). Project delivery methods in large public road projects–a case study of E6 Jaktøyen-Sentervegen. Procedia Engineering, 196, 391-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.215
  14. McCollough, E. (2021). Industry Perceptions on Public Sector Construction Delivery Methods.
  15. Ren, R., & Zhang, J. (2021). A new framework to address BIM interoperability in the AEC domain from technical and process dimensions. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8824613
  16. CMAA (Construction Management Association of America). (2012). An owner’s guide to project delivery methods.
  17. Cooper, S. (2002). Project delivery techniques for historic structures: A case study. In 2002 Annual Conference, 7, 950.
  18. Kubba, S. (2017). Types of Building Contract Agreements. Handbook of Green Building Design and Construction, 747–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-810433-0.00014-9
  19. Hallowell, M., & Toole, T. M. (2009). Contemporary design-bid-build model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(6), 540-549. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:6(540)
  20. Lam, E. W., Chan, A. P., & Chan, D. W. (2008). Determinants of successful design-build projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and management, 134(5), 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:5(333)
  21. Neidert, A. E. (2012). Analysis of the Texas A&M University System’s construction. [Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University].
  22. Nouh Meshref, A., Elkasaby, E. A., & Wageh, O. (2021). Identifying innovative reliable criteria governing the selection of infrastructures construction project delivery systems. Open Engineering, 11(1), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2021-0028
  23. Shane, J. S., & Gransberg, D. D. (2010). A critical analysis of innovations in construction manager-at-risk project delivery. In Construction Research Congress 2010: Innovation for Reshaping Construction Practice, 827-836. https://doi.org/10.1061/41109(373)83
  24. Kahvandi, Z., Saghatforoush, E., Alinezhad, M., & Noghli, F. (2017). Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) Research Trends. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 7(2), 99-114.
  25. Jackson, B. J. (2020). Construction management JumpStart: the best first step toward a career in construction management. John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Prajapati, T. (2021). Alliance Models and Lean Construction in Construction Projects. [Master’s Thesis, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences].
  27. Cassell, J. W., & Gilday, L. T. (1997). Improving the Army's Job Order Contracting Program, McLean, VA: Logistics Management Institute.
  28. Nath, A. (2021). Analysing Learners Perception about Data Analysis on Microsoft Excel. Learning Community: An International Journal on Educational and Social Development,12(2), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.30954/2231-458X.02.2021.2
  29. Masood, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2016). Determinants of behavioral intentions to use SPSS among students: Application of Technology Acceptance model (TAM). FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 146
  30. Arslan, R., & Ökten, A. (1994). Araştırma Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
  31. Neumann, W. L. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
  32. Farrell, P. (2011). Writing a built environment dissertation: practical guidance and examples. John Wiley & Sons.
  33. Garner, B., Richardson, K., & Castro-Lacouture, D. (2008). Design-build project delivery in military construction: Approach to best value procurement. Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information and Value, 1(1), 35-50.
  34. Rahola, T. B. S., & Straub, A. (2013). Project delivery methods in European social housing energy renovations. Property Management, 31(3), 216-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637471311321469
  35. Syed Zubir, S. Z., Mohd Nawi, M. N., Abdul Nifa, F. A., & Bahaudin, A. Y. (2018). An overview of project delivery methods in construction industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management (IJSCM), 7(6), 177-182.
  36. Koolwijk, J. S. J., van Oel, C. J., Wamelink, J. W. F., & Vrijhoef, R. (2018). Collaboration and integration in project-based supply chains in the construction industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(3), 04018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000592
  37. Kwak, Y. H., & Bushey, R. (2000). Construction management at risk: an innovative project delivery method at stormwater treatment area in the Everglades, Florida. In Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World, 477-482. https://doi.org/10.1061/40475(278)52
  38. Burkhart, D. (2016). CMAR Project Delivery Method Facilitates the Construction of a Large-Diameter Pipeline and Treatment Plant Upgrade Project, Allowing Timely Access to Much-Needed Water Resources in North Texas. Pipelines, 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479957.006
  39. El Asmar, M., Ariaratnam, S. T., & Francom, T. (2016). Improving Cost and Schedule Performance on Municipal Pipeline Projects: Realizing the Benefits of the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Alternative Project Delivery Method. GeoStrata Magazine Archive, 20(4), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1061/geosek.0000341
  40. Sherif, M., Abotaleb, I., & Alqahtani, F. K. (2022). Application of integrated project delivery (IPD) in the middle east: Implementation and challenges. Buildings, 12(4), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040467
  41. El Asmar, M., & Hanna, A. S. (2012). Comparative analysis of integrated project delivery (IPD) cost and quality performance. In Proceedings of the CIB W, 78.
  42. Kent, D. C., & Becerik-Gerber, B. (2010). Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136(8), 815-825. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000188
  43. Kelly, D., & Ilozor, B. (2022). Performance outcome assessment of the integrated project delivery (IPD) method for commercial construction projects in USA. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(14), 2808-2816. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1827340
  44. Mesa, H. A., Molenaar, K. R., & Alarcón, L. F. (2016). Exploring performance of the integrated project delivery process on complex building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1089-1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.007
  45. Moradi, S., & Kähkönen, K. (2022). Success in collaborative construction through the lens of project delivery elements. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(6), 973-991. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-09-2021-0118
  46. Gould, F. E. (2005). Managing the construction process. Pearson Education India.
  47. Burján, T. (2016). Procurement-& Contract models for Construction-& Infrastructure projects in the Semiconductor industry. [Doctoral dissertation, Wien].
  48. Hale, D. R., Shrestha, P. P., Gibson Jr, G. E., & Migliaccio, G. C. (2009). Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7), 579-587. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000017
  49. Suratkon, A., Yunus, R., & Deraman, R. (2020). Characteristics of Procurement Methods in Malaysia -Comparing Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build and Construction Management. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 11(3), 1-11.
  50. Ling, F. Y. Y., & Kerh, S. H. (2004). Comparing the performance of design-build and design-bid-build building projects in Singapore. Architectural Science Review, 47(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2004.9697040
  51. Bo, X., & Chan, A. P. (2008). The Investigation of Design-Build Variants in Construction Market of the People’Republic of China. In Proc. First International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries (ICCIDC-1), 384-391.
  52. Park, H. S., Lee, D., Kim, S., & Kim, J. L. (2015). Comparing project performance of design-build and design-bid-build methods for large-sized public apartment housing projects in Korea. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 14(2), 323-330. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.14.323
  53. Shrestha, P. P., & Batista, J. R. (2022). Transition from traditional to alternative project delivery methods in water and wastewater project: executive decision-makers' perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(7), 2665-2688. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2020-0791
  54. Lu, W., Hua, Y., & Zhang, S. (2017). Logistic regression analysis for factors influencing cost performance of design-bid-build and design-build projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(1), 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2015-0119
  55. Hubbard, B., & Debs, L. (2022, November). Development of an Introductory Course in Design Phase Management for Constructors. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1101(3), 032030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1101/3/032030
  56. Basir, W. N. F. W. A., Ujang, U., Majid, Z., Azri, S., & Choon, T. L. (2020). The integration of BIM and GIS in construction project–A data consistency review. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 44, 107-116. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-4-W3-2020-107-2020
  57. Zhong, Q., Tang, H., Chen, C., & Igor, M. (2023). A comprehensive appraisal of the factors impacting construction project delivery method selection: A systematic analysis. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 22(2), 802-820. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2060983
  58. Yu, T., Shen, G. Q., & Shi, Q. (2017). Comparing the performance quality of design-bid-build and design-build delivery methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(4), 04016111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001262
  59. Zhang, Y., & Hu, H. (2020). Data envelopment analysis based efficiency measurement of engineering change controlling for infrastructure construction under integrated project delivery mode. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 14(11), 1433-1439. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2019.0779
  60. Zhou, Y., Ding, L., Rao, Y., Luo, H., Medjdoub, B., & Zhong, H. (2017). Formulating project-level building information modeling evaluation framework from the perspectives of organizations: A review. Automation in construction, 81, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.05.004
  61. Omar, M. N., & Fayek, A. R. (2016). Modeling and evaluating construction project competencies and their relationship to project performance. Automation in Construction, 69, 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.021
  62. Masterman, J. W. (2013). An introduction to building procurement systems. Routledge.
  63. Pöyhönen, P., Sivunen, M., & Kajander, J. K. (2017). Developing a project delivery system for construction project–a case study. Procedia Engineering, 196, 520-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.233
  64. Migliaccio, G. C., Gibson Jr, G. E., & O'connor, J. T. (2008). Changing project delivery strategy: An implementation framework. Public Works Management & Policy, 12(3), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X07311805
  65. Fong, C. K., Avetisyan, H. G., & Cui, Q. (2014). Understanding the sustainable outcome of project delivery methods in the built environment. Organization, Technology & Management in Construction, 6(3), 1141-1155.
  66. American Institute of Architects (2016). Primer on Project Delivery Terms. Joint Committee of the AIA and the AGC.
  67. Demkin, J. A. (2001). The architect's handbook of professional practice. John Wiley & Sons.
  68. Cheung, S. O., Lam, T. I., Wan, Y. W., & Lam, K. C. (2001). Improving objectivity in procurement selection. Journal of Management in Engineering, 17(3), 132-139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2001)17:3(132)
  69. Zhong, Q., Tang, H., & Chen, C. (2022). A framework for selecting construction project delivery method using design structure matrix. Buildings, 12(4), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040443
  70. Korkmaz, S., Riley, D., & Horman, M. (2010). Piloting evaluation metrics for sustainable high-performance building project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(8), 877-885. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000195
  71. Mafakheri, F., Dai, L., Slezak, D., & Nasiri, F. (2007). Project delivery system selection under uncertainty: Multicriteria multilevel decision aid model. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(4), 200-206. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:4(200)
  72. Elghaish, F., Hosseini, M. R., Talebi, S., Abrishami, S., Martek, I., & Kagioglou, M. (2020). Factors driving success of cost management practices in integrated project delivery (IPD). Sustainability, 12(22), 9539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229539
  73. Rodrigues, M. R., & Lindhard, S. M. (2023). Benefits and challenges to applying IPD: experiences from a Norwegian mega-project. Construction Innovation, 23(2), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-03-2021-0042
  74. Nifa, F. A. A., Nawi, M. N. M., Nadzri, W., & Osman, S. A. R. (2015). Towards development of sustainable design in Malaysian university campus: A preliminary framework for Universiti Utara Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(5), 43-49.
  75. Hamzeh, F., Rached, F., Hraoui, Y., Karam, A. J., Malaeb, Z., El Asmar, M., & Abbas, Y. (2019). Integrated project delivery as an enabler for collaboration: a Middle East perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(3), 334-347. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-05-2018-0084
  76. Gad, G. M., Adamtey, S. A., & Gransberg, D. D. (2015). Trends in quality management approaches to design–build transportation projects. Transportation Research Record, 2504(1), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.3141/2504-11
  77. Jin, R., Zou, Y., Gidado, K., Ashton, P., & Painting, N. (2019). Scientometric analysis of BIM-based research in construction engineering and management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(8), 1750-1776. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2018-0350
  78. Khanna, M., Elghaish, F., McIlwaine, S., & Brooks, T. (2021). Feasibility of implementing ipd approach for infrastructure projects in developing countries. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 26, 902-921. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.048
  79. Harjono, R., Gusfa, H., & Bintoro, B. P. K. (2021). Effect of ipd implementation and communication between contractor and owner on the success of a building project in jakarta barat. International Journal of Research and Review, 8(3), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20210310
  80. Adamtey, S. (2021). Cost and time performance analysis of progressive design-build projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(3), 686-697. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-05-2020-0164
  81. Zhang, K., Erfani, A., Beydoun, O., & Cui, Q. (2022). Procurement Benchmarks for Major Transportation Projects. Transportation Research Record, 2676(11), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221092722
  82. Hasanzadeh, S., Esmaeili, B., Nasrollahi, S., Gad, G., & Gransberg, D. (2018). Impact of Owners’ Early Decisions on Project Performance and Dispute Occurrence in Public Highway Projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000251
  83. Bilge, E. C., & Yaman, H. (2021). Information management roles in real estate development lifecycle: literature review on BIM and IPD framework. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-04-2019-0036
  84. Gabel, M., Sujka, M., Davis, Z. W., & Keizur, A. E. (2023). Performance of Risk-Based Estimating for Capital Projects. Transportation Research Record, 2677(1), 1059-1070. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221103238
  85. Azar, E., O'Brien, W., Carlucci, S., Hong, T., Sonta, A., Kim, J.,. & Zhou, J. (2020). Simulation-aided occupant-centric building design: A critical review of tools, methods, and applications. Energy and Buildings, 224, 110292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110292