SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 1

The Involvement of Project Stakeholders in the Briefing Process: Evaluations through a Construction Project

Ekrem Bahadır Çalışkan(ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MİMARLIK VE GÜZEL SANATLAR FAKÜLTESİ, MİMARLIK BÖLÜMÜ, MİMARLIK PR. (İNGİLİZCE))0000-0002-5258-2976
Mehmet Koray Pekeriçli(MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE)0000-0001-5888-4265
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-01-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, for construction projects, the participation of all project stakeholders in the briefing processes may not be ensured due to the implementation method of the project.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The briefing is a process to ensure that the project stakeholders work together from inception to completion of construction by implementing knowledge management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Examples of situations where issues and problems can be addressed and decisions made more realistically and accurately when contractual and working relationships and project stakeholders are involved in all processes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, for construction projects, the participation of all project stakeholders in the briefing processes may not be ensured due to the implementation method of the project.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Briefing Process · Project Stakeholders · Education Building

Abstract

The briefing is a process to ensure that the project stakeholders work together from inception to completion of construction by implementing knowledge management. Effective and continuous involvement of project stakeholders in the briefing is vital for the success of the process and the project. The level and method of participation differ due to the project delivery method; however, the importance of managing project stakeholders' knowledge and experience always remains the place. This study presents the definition and importance of construction briefing and the place of project stakeholders in the process. Then, the participation of project stakeholders is discussed through an example of an existing construction management process. The main objective is to evaluate the relationship of the decision-making process between the involvement of project stakeholders for different stages of construction projects. Thus, Anka Bilim College Building, in which the involvement of project stakeholders was ensured from start to completion, was utilized as a case study. Session examples from the briefing records, kept by the architect from the design phase to the completion of construction, are presented and evaluated as sessions in time order. The evaluation and discussion were made by exploring the sessions' descriptive information. For an important finding, it can be said that the continuous participation of project stakeholders in briefing processes provides a basis for making the right decision with the help of their knowledge, and experience. Examples of situations where issues and problems can be addressed and decisions made more realistically and accurately when contractual and working relationships and project stakeholders are involved in all processes. However, for construction projects, the participation of all project stakeholders in the briefing processes may not be ensured due to the implementation method of the project.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çalışkan, E. B., Pekeriçli, M. K. (2025). The Involvement of Project Stakeholders in the Briefing Process: Evaluations through a Construction Project. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Volume: 9 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1496562

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Olatokun, E., & Pathirage, C. (2015). Importance of Knowledge Capturing (KC) in the Design Briefing Process in the Construction Industry. In 12th International Postgraduate Research Conference (IPGRC 2015) (pp. 1–16). Manhcester.
  2. Ryd, N. (2004). The design brief as carrier of client information during the construction process. Design Studies, 25(3), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.003
  3. Blyth, A., & Worthigton, J. (2010). Managing the Brief for Better Design, 2nd Ed. ROUTLEDGE. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00035-7
  4. RIBA Plan Of Work: (2013). RIBA. Retrieved 17 December 2020, from www.ribaplanofwork.com
  5. Wandahl, S. (2004). Visual Value Clarification - A Method for an Effective Brief, X(4), 317–326
  6. Barrett, P., & Stanley, C. (1999). Better Construction Briefing. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  7. Coskun, H., & Sancar, S. (2021). Client satisfaction as perceived by Architects and Civil Engineers. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 5(3), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.688291
  8. Kamran, K. V., & Khorrami, B. (2022). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for the assessment of forest health applying hyper spectral imageries: A case study from Ramsar forest, North of Iran. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 7(3), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.940166
  9. Sarı, F., & Sarı, F. K. (2021). Multi criteria decision analysis to determine the suitability of agricultural crops for land consolidation areas. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 6(2), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.683754
  10. Faatz, S. (2009). Architectural programming: providing essential knowledge of project participants needs in the pre-design phase. Organization, technology & management in construction: an international journal, 1(2), 80–85.
  11. Kamara, J. M., Anumba, C. J., & Hobbs, B. (1999). From Briefing To Client Requirements Processing. Liverpool John Moores University. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 1(September), 15–17.
  12. Çalışkan, E. B., & Pekeriçli, M. K. (2023). Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation, 6(3), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
  13. Shen, Q., Li, H., Chung, J., & Hui, P. Y. (2004). A framework for identification and representation of client requirements in the briefing process. Construction Management and Economics, 22(2), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619042000201411
  14. Bogers, T., Van Meel, J. J., & Van Der Voordt, T. J. m. (2008). Architects about briefing: Recommendations to improve communication between clients and architects. Facilities, 26(3–4), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770810849454
  15. Olatokun, E. O. (2017). Requirement Elicitation Using Knowledge Capturing (Kc) Techniques During the Client Briefing Process for Improved Client Satisfaction in The UK Construction Industry. The University of Salford.
  16. Bray, I. (2002). An introduction to requirements engineering. Addison-Wesley.
  17. Parsanezhad, P., Tarandi, V., & Lund, R. (2016). FORMALIZED REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT IN THE BRIEFING AND DESIGN PHASE, A PIVOTAL REVIEW OF LITERATURE. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon) (Vol. 21).
  18. Kamara, J. M., Anumba, C. J., Carrillo, P. M., & Bouchlaghem, D. (n.d.). Conceptual framework for live capture and reuse of project knowledge. In International Conference on Information Technology for Construction (pp. 178–185).
  19. Tan, H. C., Anumba, C. J., Carrillo, P. M., Bouchlaghem, D., Kamara, J., & Udeaja, C. (2010). Capture and Reuse of Project Knowledge in Construction. Capture and Reuse of Project Knowledge in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315448
  20. Al-Ghassani, A. (2003). Improving the structural design process: A knowledge management approach.” Ph.D. thesis. Loughborough University.
  21. Pourzolfaghar, Z., Ibrahim, R., Abdullah, R., & Adam, N. M. (2014). A technique to capture multi-disciplinary tacit knowledge during the conceptual design phase of a building project. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649214500130
  22. Baldauf, J. P., Formoso, C. T., Tzortzopoulos, P., Miron, L. I. G., & Soliman, J. (2020). Using building information modelling to manage client requirements in social housing projects. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072804
  23. Ghannad, P., Lee, Y. C., Dimyadi, J., & Solihin, W. (2019). Automated BIM data validation integrating open-standard schema with visual programming language. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 40(January), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.01.006
  24. Narayanswamy, H., Liu, H., & Al-Hussein, M. (2019). BIM-based automated design checking for building permit in the light-frame building industry. In Proceedings of the 36th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, ISARC 2019 (pp. 1042–1049). https://doi.org/10.22260/isarc2019/0139
  25. Zhong, B., Gan, C., Luo, H., & Xing, X. (2018). Ontology-based framework for building environmental monitoring and compliance checking under BIM environment. Building and Environment, 141(December 2017), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.046
  26. Elalwani, E., & Çalışkan, E. B. (2024). Integrating BIM technology in construction for effective knowledge management: case studies and methodological insights. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 8(4), 647–655. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1458923
  27. Barrett, P. S., Hudson, J., & Stanley, C. (1999). Good practice in briefing: the limits of rationality. Automation in Construction, (8), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(98)00108-3
  28. Pegoraroa, C., & Carísio, I. de P. (2017). Requirements processing for building design: A systematic review. Producao, 27, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.212116
  29. Norouzi, N., Shabak, M., Embi, M. R. Bin, & Khan, T. H. (2015). The Architect, the Client and Effective Communication in Architectural Design Practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.413
  30. Othman, A. A. E., Hassan, T. M., & Pasquire, C. L. (2005). Dynamic Brief Development For Better Constcution. In 5th International Postgraduate Research Conference.
  31. Tessema, Y. A. (2008). BIM for improved building design communication between architects and clients in the schematic design phase. Texas Tech University.
  32. Baccarini, D. (1999). The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289903000405
  33. RIBA. (2020). Plan of Work 2020. Riba, 10–11.
  34. Jallow, A. K., Demian, P., Baldwin, A. N., & Anumba, C. J. (2019). An integrated requirements management system for construction projects. EG-ICE 2010 - 17th International Workshop on Intelligent Computing in Engineering, (July 2015).
  35. Levy, S. M. (2007). Project Management in Construction. Design and Construction (Fifth.). mcgraw hill. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080491080
  36. Aktuna, M. E., & Eskici, B. (2024). Restoration manager: Adapting project delivery methods for the restoration of architectural heritage. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 8(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1386599
  37. Touran, A., Gransberg, D. D., Molenaar, K. R., Ghavamifar, K., Mason, D. J., & Fithian, L. A. (2009). A Guidebook for the Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods. A Guidebook for the Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods. https://doi.org/10.17226/14238
  38. Chimay J. Anumba, Charles O. Egbu, P. M. C. (2005). Knowledge management in construction. https://doi.org/10.4018/jitpm.2010040102
  39. Aktuna, M. E. (2023). The divergent perspectives of civil engineers and architects in historic building restoration: A comparative analysis. Cultural Heritage and Science, 4(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1354966
  40. Shahrin, F., Johansen, E., Lockley, S., & Udeaja, C. (2010). Effective Capture, Translating and Delivering Client Requirements Using Building Information Modelling (Bim) Technology. In Arcom Research Workshop On Decision-Making Across Levels, Time And Space: Exploring Theories, Methods And Practices (pp. 38–45). Manchester: EPSRC. https://doi.org/ARCOM
  41. Çalışkan, E. B. (2023). Design and Construction of Anka Bilim School: A Review for Process. In M. E. Başar & İ. A. Ata (Eds.), Pioneer and Contemporary Studies in Architecture, Planning And Design (pp. 129–153).
  42. Faatz, S. (2009). Architectural programming: providing essential knowledge of project participants needs in the pre-design phase. Organization, technology & management in construction: an international journal, 1(2), 80–85.