SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Urban Silhouette Analysis in Historical Peninsula Süleymaniye District Using Digital Twin Technology

Sevenay Uzun Altuntaş0000-0002-7222-8974
Hatice Atalay(İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0623-5172
Adalet Dervisoglu(İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İNŞAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-7455-4282
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This research highlights the potential of integrating digital twin technologies into urban planning and heritage management, providing a robust framework for future applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The increasing urban population, intensified urbanization, and environmental changes necessitate innovative, technology-driven approaches to achieving sustainable development and enhancing urban livability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study investigates the application of GIS-supported digital twins to preserve the historical silhouette of the Süleymaniye District on Istanbul’s Historical Peninsula, a region of significant cultural heritage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This research highlights the potential of integrating digital twin technologies into urban planning and heritage management, providing a robust framework for future applications.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Digital twin · Urban Silhouette Analysis · Süleymaniye District

Abstract

The increasing urban population, intensified urbanization, and environmental changes necessitate innovative, technology-driven approaches to achieving sustainable development and enhancing urban livability. Geographic Information Systems (GIS)- supported digital twin technologies have emerged as transformative tools in urban planning, management, and cultural heritage preservation. By replicating the physical environment, digital twins support advanced analysis and simulation processes, particularly in documenting and safeguarding historical and cultural assets. This study investigates the application of GIS-supported digital twins to preserve the historical silhouette of the Süleymaniye District on Istanbul’s Historical Peninsula, a region of significant cultural heritage. A high-resolution 3D mesh model of the area was developed, integrating GIS data on building heights, topography, and spatial density to assess the current silhouette against legal height restrictions and urban planning principles outlined in the Prost Plan. The study identifies structures that obstruct the iconic silhouette of the Süleymaniye Mosque and evaluates the potential of digital twins to simulate urban scenarios, guide restoration efforts, and inform sustainable planning strategies. This research examines the impact of existing and proposed building heights on the skyline through comparative analyses, providing insights into the visual impact of planning decisions in historical and cultural heritage areas. Using digital twin technology and GIS tools, the existing building height model for the Süleymaniye District is compared with the optimal height limits defined in existing zoning plans. This study analyzes the areas where incompatible developments, illegal additions, unpermitted uses, and structures are concentrated, and demonstrates how these areas, due to their location within the Süleymaniye District, negatively impact Istanbul's historic skyline. Furthermore, the methods used in this study offer insights to assist urban planners and decision-makers in overcoming urban and administrative challenges. The findings demonstrate the critical role of digital twins in preserving urban identity and cultural memory while addressing modern planning challenges. This research highlights the potential of integrating digital twin technologies into urban planning and heritage management, providing a robust framework for future applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

Altuntaş, S. U., Atalay, H., Dervisoglu, A. (2026). Urban Silhouette Analysis in Historical Peninsula Süleymaniye District Using Digital Twin Technology. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1811939

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Kuşçuoğlu, G. Ö., & Taş, M. (2017). Sürdürülebilir kültürel miras yönetimi. Yalvaç Akademi Dergisi, 2(1), 58-67.
  2. Fathelrahman, S., & Mohamed, H. (2025). Remote sensing and GIS methods for detecting changes in land cover and urbanization in Khartoum, Sudan (1975–2022). Turkish Journal of Engineering, 9(3), 678–685. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1694805.
  3. Bhavsar, C., Gadhavi, M., & Shaikh, M. (2025). Impact assessment of land use change detection on the environment of Ahmedabad district, Gujarat, India using supervised classification in GIS. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 9(4), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1605134
  4. Horoz, M., & Algancı, U. (2025). Determining the relationship between zoning plans and urban development using remote sensing methods: A case study of Ankara. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 9(3), 591–598. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1694446
  5. Ulvi, A. (2020). Importance of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the documentation of cultural heritage. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 4(3), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.637050
  6. Şasi, A., & Yakar, M. (2017). Photogrammetric modelling of Sakahane Masjid using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 1(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.316675
  7. Tuncer, S., & Avdan, U. (2024). Comparative analysis of non-invasive measurement methods for optimizing architectural documentation. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 9(2), 302-313. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1424881.
  8. Ulvi, A., & Toprak, A. S. (2016). Investigation of three-dimensional modelling availability taken photograph of the unmanned aerial vehicle; sample of kanlidivane church. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.285216.
  9. Özdemir, E., Çallı, R., & Kartal, S. (2024). Utilization of unmanned aerial vehicles for the detection and localization of deteriorations in historical structures: A case study of Ishak Pasha Palace. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 9(3), 377-389. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1464867.
  10. Çolak, Ş. T., & Çolak, A. T. (2024). Aksaray Müzesi’nde bulunan Hitit Steli’nin 3B modellenmesi ve sesli rehberlik oluşturulması. Geomatik, 9(2), 238-244. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1427357.
  11. Ulvi, A., Yakar, M., Yiğit, A. Y., & Kaya, Y. (2020). İHA ve Yersel Fotogrametrik Teknikler Kullanarak Aksaray Kızıl Kilisenin 3B Modelinin ve Nokta Bulutunun Elde Edilmesi. Geomatik, 5(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.560179. Yakar, M., & Doğan, Y. (2017). Mersin Silifke Mezgit Kale Anıt Mezarı fotogrametrik rölöve alımı ve üç boyutlu modelleme çalışması. Geomatik, 2(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.29128/ geomatik.296763.
  12. Buhur, S., Uluğtekin, N., Gümüşay, M. Ü., & Musaoğlu, N. (2023). Turistik amaçlı mekânsal sanal ortamların oluşturulması: Tarihi Yarımada Örneği. Geomatik, 8(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1133484.
  13. Partigöç, N. S. (2023). Sürdürülebilir Kentsel Planlama Süreçlerinde Akıllı Şehir Yaklaşımının Rolü. Çevre Şehir ve İklim Dergisi, 2(3), 174-189.
  14. Quamar, M. M., Al-Ramadan, B., Khan, K., Shafiullah, M., & El Ferik, S. (2023). Advancements and applications of drone-integrated geographic information system technology—A review. Remote Sensing, 15(20), 5039. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15205039.
  15. Segovia, M., & Garcia-Alfaro, J. (2022). Design, modeling and implementation of digital twins. Sensors, 22(14), 5396. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145396.
  16. Tomko, M., & Winter, S. (2019). Beyond digital twins – A commentary. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(2), 395-399. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318816992.
  17. Ketzler, B., Naserentin, V., Latino, F., Zangelidis, C., Thuvander, L., & Logg, A. (2020). Digital twins for cities: A state of the art review. Built environment, 46(4), 547-573. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.46.4.547.
  18. Kucak, R. A., & Dervişoğlu, A. (2023). The heritage building information modelling of the Church of St. Sophia in Ohrid, North Macedonia. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 23(3), 31-43. ISSN (Online): 2241-8121.
  19. Korumaz, A. G., Dülgerler, O. N., & Yakar, M. (2011). Kültürel mirasin belgelenmesinde dijital yaklaşimlar. Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 26(3), 67-83. ISSN: 1304‐8708.
  20. Polat, Y., & Polat, R. T. (2025). Arkeolojik Belgelemede Teknolojik Yaklaşımlar: Yazılıkaya/Midas Kale Çalışmaları. Geomatik, 10(3), 364-374. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1643529.
  21. Turgut, S., & Özden, P. (2005). Sürdürülebilir ve Turizm Eksenli Bir Kentsel Dönüşüm Hedefine Doğru: Eminönü Tarihi Kent Merkezi. Planlama Dergisi, Journal of the Chamber of City Planners, 31, 49-62. ISSN 1300-7319.
  22. Kılıçer, S. T., Cömert, Ç., & Akıncı, H. (2018). 3B Kent Modelleri İçin Yeni Bir Silüet Analizi Modülünün Geliştirilmesi. Geomatik, 3(3), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.390081.
  23. Ariyachandra, M. M. F., & Wedawatta, G. (2023). Digital twin smart cities for disaster risk management: A review of evolving concepts. Sustainability, 15(15), 11910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511910.
  24. Aras, S., & Dağtekin, E. E. (2024). Restorasyon Çalışmalarında Dijital Yöntemlerin Kullanılması: Diyarbakır Şeyhoğlu Konağı Örneği. Social Sciences Studies Journal, 10(9), 1583-1595.
  25. Kaymaz, I. (2013). Urban landscapes and identity. İçinde Advances in landscape architecture. IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/45403.https://doi.org/ 10.5772/55754.
  26. Akdag, S. G., Cagdas, G., & Guney, C. (2010). Analyzing the changes of Bosphorus Silhouette. Education and research in computer aided architectural design in Europe (eCAADe) 28th Conference: Future Cities, 15-18.
  27. Çelen, D. (2016). Kentsel koruma silüet kavramı ve silüetin önemi: İstanbul tarihi yarımada örneği [Master’s Thesis, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi]. https://acikerisim.msgsu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.14124/1447
  28. Akpınar, İ. Y. (2010). İstanbul’u Yeniden İnşa Etmek: 1937 Henri Prost Planı. In 2000’den kesitler II: Cumhuriyet’in mekanları/zamanları/insanları, doktora araştırmaları sempozyumu kitabı (ss. 107-124). Dipnot Yayınları ve ODTU Yayınevi. ISBN: 978-975-9051-88-4.
  29. Erken, E. (2022). İstanbul’da Cumhuriyet Döneminde Planlama Çalışmaları: Henri Prost Ve Luigi Piccinato’nun Planlarının Sonraki Dönemlere Etkileri Açısından Mukayeseli Analizi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(45), 1626-1648. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.1224428
  30. Istanbul Historic Areas Site Management Directorate. (2018). Istanbul Historic Peninsula Site Management Plan.
  31. Ülgen, Ö. (2005). İstanbul-Süleymaniye Bölgesinin Yeniden Değerlendirilmesi Mimari Tasarım Önerileri. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. http://dspace.yildiz.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/1/11189.
  32. Şevkin, E., & Gül, M. (2017). İstanbul Silüetindeki Değişim*: İstanbul Silüetindeki Değişim. Tasarim+ Kuram, 13(23), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.23835/tasarimkuram.370211.
  33. Kanun, E., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2021). Cultural heritage modelling using UAV photogrammetric methods: A case study of Kanlıdivane archeological site. Advanced UAV, 1(1), 24-33.
  34. UNESCO. (2023). The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/
  35. Onur, S. S. (2020). İstanbul Süleymaniye Bölgesinin kültür değerlerinin sürekliliği kapsamında yenilenmesi ve korunması üzerine bir yöntem önerisi [Doktora tezi].
  36. Şentürk, A., & Sadıkoğlu, H. (2014). A Criticism on Historic Preservation in Süleymaniye Neighbourhood, Istanbul. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/152488058.pdf