SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

From Retreat to Regeneration: Optimizing Sustainable Heritage Tourism through Turkish Çilehanes under a Triple-Bottom-Line Systems Approach in Anatolia

Elif Gizem Yetkin(ALANYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8775-8313
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Employing a triangulated methodology of literature review, on-site architectural analysis, and stakeholder interviews, the findings reveal that conservation efforts have preserved architectural integrity while revitalising intangible heritage practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Çilehanes, once secluded Sufi retreats, present untapped potential for advancing sustainable heritage tourism in Anatolia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research proposes a transferable evaluation matrix that integrates global standards with place-specific socio-ecological indicators, demonstrating that context-sensitive, community-led reuse can transform Çilehanes into laboratories of environmental stewardship and cultural continuity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Employing a triangulated methodology of literature review, on-site architectural analysis, and stakeholder interviews, the findings reveal that conservation efforts have preserved architectural integrity while revitalising intangible heritage practices.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çilehane · Adaptive reuse · Sustainable tourism

Abstract

Çilehanes, once secluded Sufi retreats, present untapped potential for advancing sustainable heritage tourism in Anatolia. This study evaluates the adaptive reuse of the fifteenth-century Somuncu Baba Çilehane through a triple-bottom-line lens, guided by the Global Sustainable Tourism Council criteria, alongside Magis and Shinn’s social sustainability principles and Palang and Fry’s landscape framework. Employing a triangulated methodology of literature review, on-site architectural analysis, and stakeholder interviews, the findings reveal that conservation efforts have preserved architectural integrity while revitalising intangible heritage practices. Economic gains have emerged through local employment and SME development, yet seasonal visitor peaks continue to strain waste management and accessibility. The research proposes a transferable evaluation matrix that integrates global standards with place-specific socio-ecological indicators, demonstrating that context-sensitive, community-led reuse can transform Çilehanes into laboratories of environmental stewardship and cultural continuity. However, adaptive, cycle-driven governance is essential to mitigate visitor pressure and ensure equitable benefit distribution. The study contributes a practical model for policymakers and heritage managers aiming to reconcile heritage conservation with sustainable tourism development within culturally layered landscapes

🔖

Cite This Article

Yetkin, E. G. (2026). From Retreat to Regeneration: Optimizing Sustainable Heritage Tourism through Turkish Çilehanes under a Triple-Bottom-Line Systems Approach in Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1847141

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (47)

  1. Tosun, E. K. (2009). The phenomenon of sustainability and its effects on urban structure. Paradoks Journal of Economics, Sociology and Politics, 5(2), 9–11.
  2. Alparslan, İ. (2015). UNESCO, sustainable development and culture: The example of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) (Unpublished specialist thesis). UNESCO National Commission of Turkey.
  3. Aktune, M. E., & Eskici, B. (2024). Restoration manager: Adapting project delivery methods for the restoration of architectural heritage. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 8(2), 265–281.
  4. Türkoğlu, İ. (2020). The place and importance of cultural heritage in sustainable development. Trakya University Journal of Faculty of Letters, 10(20), 117–143. doi:10.33207/trkede.692194
  5. Cagan, M., & Unel, F. B. (2024). SWOT analysis of green building systems in real estate development. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 8(2), 330–340.
  6. United Nations Environment Programme, & World Tourism Organization. (2005). Making tourism more sustainable: A guide for policy makers. United Nations.
  7. Liu, Z. (2003). Sustainable tourism development: A critique. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 11(6), 459–475. doi:10.1080/09669580308667216
  8. Ercan, O. (2020). Essentials of a sustainable land use planning approach for rural areas and a model proposal to be applied under Turkish conditions. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 4(3).
  9. Palang, H., & Fry, G. (Eds.). (2003). Landscape interfaces: Cultural heritage in changing landscapes. Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0189-1
  10. Sutare, N., & Sutare, M. (2021). Importance of sustainable tourism in biodiversity conservation. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 9(5), 171–175.
  11. Butler, R. W. (1999). Sustainable tourism: A state-of-the-art review. Tourism Geographies, 1(1), 7–25. doi:10.1080/14616689908721291
  12. Magis, K., & Shinn, C. (2008). Emergent principles of social sustainability. In J. Dillard, V. Dujon, & M. C. King (Eds.), Understanding the social dimension of sustainability (pp. 15–45). Routledge.
  13. Timisi, A. H. (2007). Anatolian culture and semahs (Master’s thesis). Haliç University.
  14. United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
  15. World Tourism Organization. (1999). Global code of ethics for tourism.
  16. Global Sustainable Tourism Council. (2008). Global sustainable tourism criteria.
  17. Kocaboyun, S. (2009). Sustainable development and tourism. Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences, 18(3), 295–310.
  18. Demir, M., Pelit, E., & Türkoğlu, T. (2018). Sustainability of cultural heritage: An examination of the curricula of institutions providing tourism education. Tourism Academic Journal, 5(2), 73–83.
  19. Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2011). Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 411–421. doi:10.1080/09669582.2011.580586
  20. Cernat, L., & Gourdon, J. (2007). Is the concept of sustainable tourism sustainable? Developing the sustainable tourism benchmarking tool. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  21. Güneş, S. G. (2018). Experiences on sustainable tourism development in Turkey. In ICOEST–International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology (pp. 199–207).
  22. Serçek, S. (2015). Sustainable tourism: Conceptual framework and case studies. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 15(1), 1–15. doi:10.18037/ausbd.98038
  23. Global Sustainable Tourism Council. (2019). GSTC destination criteria.
  24. Erdoğan, B. G., & Polatoğlu, Ç. (2021). Building performance evaluation for adaptive reuse: A multi-criteria approach. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(7), 2427–2440. doi:10.13189/cea.2021.090728
  25. Kuyrukçu, Z., & Kuyrukçu, E. Y. (2015). Evaluation of adaptation of historical buildings to new functions in terms of sustainability: Fuat Anadolu House. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium (pp. 517–525). Gazi University.
  26. Köksal, T. G. (2006). Conservation and reuse proposals for industrial heritage in Istanbul. ITU Journal A: Architecture, Planning, Design, 5(2), 125–136.
  27. Özdemir, H. (2021). Similar aspects of Hittite culture and religion with contemporary Anatolian culture. Journal of Cultural Studies, 8, 135–154. doi:10.46250/kulturder.861710
  28. Heyes, C. (2012). New thinking: The evolution of human cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2091–2096. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0111
  29. Kurnalı, M., & Koca, D. (2020). Çilehane as a place for thinking. In C. Gambardella (Ed.), World heritage and contamination: XVIII International Forum “Le Vie dei Mercanti” (pp. 25–33). Gangemi Editore.
  30. Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.). Log cabin. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/tr/sözlük/ingilizce/log-cabin
  31. Rees, E. (2014). Cabins in modern Norwegian literature: Negotiating place and identity. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
  32. Hungnes, S. N. (2015). Cabin fever: A historical study of nature perceptions in media representations of Norwegian cabin tradition (Master’s thesis). University of Oslo.
  33. Kurnalı, M., & Koca, D. (2021). Places of thinking and self-evaluation: Anatolian çilehanes. Journal of Turkish Culture and Hacı Bektaş Veli Research, 99, 105–128. doi:10.34189/hbv.99.005
  34. Demirci, M. (2007). The Mevlevi retreat as an educational tool. Marife: Journal of Religious Studies, 7(3), 105–122.
  35. Demirarslan, D. (2016). The concept of retreat (çilehane) in religious and Sufi culture and the Gelibolu Retreat House in terms of spatial characteristics. Journal of Turkish Culture and Hacı Bektaş Veli Research, 77, 175–196.
  36. Doğan, A. (1977). Sectarian buildings in Ottoman architecture: Tekkes, zawiyas and futuwwa buildings. Istanbul Technical University Press.
  37. Pallasmaa, J. (2012). Writing about architecture: Mastering the language of buildings and cities. Princeton Architectural Press.
  38. Karakuş, F., Çalışkan, E. B., & İsmail, S. H. (2025). Structural analysis of traditional Antakya houses after the Kahramanmaraş earthquake. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 9(4), 686–701.
  39. Akbulut, Ç. D., & Önder, S. (2011). Aksaray kenti açık-yeşil alanlarının nitelik ve nicelik yönünden incelenmesi. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture & Food Sciences, 25(1).
  40. Ulusoy, K. F. (2021). Architectural design boundaries with variables from past to future: The case of Aksaray city centre (Master’s thesis). Konya Technical University.
  41. Ulu, M. (2021). Şeyh Hâmid-i Velî (Somuncu Baba) and his work Silâhü’l-Mürîdîn. Journal of National Cultural Studies, 5(1), 135–146.
  42. Kemikli, B. (2015). Somuncu Baba (Hamidüddin of Aksaray). In A. H. Furat (Ed.), The adventure of thought from East to West: Philosophy and rational thought in the Ottoman Empire (Vol. 8, pp. 120–135). İnsan Publishing.
  43. Canbulut, S. (n.d.). Somuncu Baba Mosque and Complex (Unpublished specialist thesis). Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Culture and Tourism.
  44. Tuncer, M., & Taşkın, G. A. (2020). YouTube video analysis of Aksaray Somuncu Baba Complex within the scope of faith tourism. International Journal of Social Research, 13(74), 2055–2070. doi:10.26677/TR1010.2020.466
  45. Google. (2025). Somuncu Baba Türbesi (Aksaray) [Map]. Google Maps.
  46. Global Sustainable Tourism Council. (2021). GSTC criteria for attractions.
  47. Ulvi, A. (2020). Importance of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the documentation of cultural heritage. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 4(3), 104–112.