Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 4

Hybrid Deep Learning Frameworks for Spatial–Temporal Dynamics Analysis Based on Remote Sensing and GIS

Peyman Yariyan(University of Tabriz)0000-0000-0000-2564
Bakhtiar Feizizadeh(Humboldt Univerity of Berlin)0000-0002-3367-2923
Thomas Blaschke(university of Salzburg)0000-0002-1860-8458
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study provides a scientific and practical framework for soil management, vegetation conservation, and dust risk mitigation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Atmospheric mineral dust critically influences climate systems, ecological frameworks, and human health, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Quantitative analyses demonstrated that all models possess significant predictive capability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study provides a scientific and practical framework for soil management, vegetation conservation, and dust risk mitigation.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geoinformation · Deep feature learning · Earth observation data

Abstract

Atmospheric mineral dust critically influences climate systems, ecological frameworks, and human health, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. While various modeling approaches have been applied to map dust susceptibility, conventional methods often fail to capture the complex spatio-temporal interactions governing dust emission dynamics. This study addresses this gap by evaluating four hybrid deep learning-support vector machine (DL-SVM) frameworks—CNN-SVM, DBN-SVM, LSTM-SVM, and AE-SVM—for predicting dust-prone areas in the Lake Urmia Basin, Iran. Quantitative analyses demonstrated that all models possess significant predictive capability. The LSTM-SVM model achieved the highest discriminative power during training (AUC = 0.981), while the AE-SVM model delivered the most robust generalization during testing, with an accuracy of 87.63%. SHAP-based feature importance analysis revealed that the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was the uniformly dominant factor controlling dust susceptibility across all models. Complementary soil properties—texture, pH, and salinity—played a decisive secondary role. These findings confirm that hybrid deep learning architectures, which simultaneously leverage spatial, temporal, and non-linear feature representations, offer superior capability in identifying dust-source areas compared to traditional models. This study provides a scientific and practical framework for soil management, vegetation conservation, and dust risk mitigation.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yariyan, P., Feizizadeh, B., Blaschke, T., Karimzadeh, S. (2026). Hybrid Deep Learning Frameworks for Spatial–Temporal Dynamics Analysis Based on Remote Sensing and GIS. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Volume: 10 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1946149

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (44)

  1. Abro, A. A., Sıddıque, W. A., Talpur, M. S. H., Jumani, A. K., & Yaşar, E. (2023). A combined approach of base and meta learners for hybrid system. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 7(1), 25–32.
  2. Ahrari, A., Panchanathan, A., & Torabi Haghighi, A. (2024). Dust over water: Analyzing the impact of lake desiccation on dust storms on the Iranian Plateau. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 480, 136377. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136377
  3. Alkhayer, M., Eghbal, M. K., Hamzehpour, N., & Rahnemaie, R. (2023). Brine geochemical changes and salt crust evolution of Lake Urmia in Iran. Catena, 231, 107310. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107310
  4. 4 Ali Soltan, H., Feizizadeh, B., Ghanbari, A., & Emamei, H. (2026). An integrated data driven approach for spatiotemporal analysis of climate change environmental impacts on groundwater resource and aquifers quality. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 10(3), 1188–1202. doi:10.31127/tuje.1946261
  5. Alnasser, F., Chehbouni, A., & Entekhabi, D. (2025). Influences of soil moisture and vegetation cover on dust emission using satellite observations. Aeolian Research, 72, 100961. doi:10.1016/j.aeolia.2025.100961
  6. Balkanlou, K. R., Mueller, B., Cord, A. F., Panahi, F., Malekian, A., Jafari, M., & Egli, L. (2020). Spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem services provision in a degraded ecosystem: A systematic assessment in the Lake Urmia basin, Iran. Science of the Total Environment, 716, 137100. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137100
  7. Boroughani, M., Pourhashemi, S., Hashemi, H., Salehi, M., Amirahmadi, A., Asadi, M. A., & Berndtsson, R. (2020). Application of remote sensing techniques and machine learning algorithms in dust source detection and dust susceptibility mapping. Ecological Informatics, 56, 101059. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101059
  8. Chen, H., Li, W., Chen, S., & Shi, Z. (2022). Semantic-aware dense representation learning for remote sensing image change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60, 1–18. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2022.3185625
  9. Delju, A. H., Ceylan, A., Piguet, E., & Rebetez, M. (2013). Observed climate variability and change in Urmia Lake Basin, Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 111, 285–296. doi:10.1007/s00704-012-0651-3
  10. Elahei, W. M., Feizizadeh, B., Khatibi, M. B., & Khorrami, B. (2026). A multiple integrated spatial decision-making approach for soil degradation mapping under the impact of climate and intensive lake drought. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 10(3), 1103–1115. doi:10.31127/tuje.1933687
  11. Feizizadeh, B., Yariyan, P., Yakar, M., Blaschke, T., & Almuraqab, N. A. S. (2025). An integrated hybrid deep learning data driven approaches for spatiotemporal mapping of land susceptibility to salt/dust emissions. Advances in Space Research, 75(10), 7112–7134. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2025.02.047
  12. Gholami, H., & Mohammadifar, A. (2022). Novel deep learning hybrid models (CNN-GRU and DLDL-RF) for the susceptibility classification of dust sources in the Middle East: A global source. Scientific Reports, 12, 19342. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-24036-5
  13. Gholami, H., Mohamadifar, A., & Collins, A. L. (2019). Spatial mapping of the provenance of storm dust: Application of data mining and ensemble modelling. Atmospheric Research, 233, 104716. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104716
  14. Gholami, H., Mohamadifar, A., Rahimi, S., Kaskaoutis, D. G., & Collins, A. L. (2021). Predicting land susceptibility to atmospheric dust emissions in central Iran by combining integrated data mining and a regional climate model. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 12(4), 172–187. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2021.03.005
  15. Göksel, C., & Balçık, F. B. (2019). Land use and land cover changes using SPOT 5 pansharpen images: A case study in Akdeniz district, Mersin-Turkey. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 3(1), 32–38.
  16. Goudie, A. S., & Middleton, N. J. (2006). Desert dust in the global system. Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/3-540-32355-4
  17. Hamidi, M., & Roshani, A. (2023). Investigation of climate change effects on Iraq dust activity using LSTM. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 14(10), 101874. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2023.101874
  18. Hesami, A., & Amini, A. (2016). Changes in irrigated land and agricultural water use in the Lake Urmia basin. Lake and Reservoir Management, 32(3), 288–296. doi:10.1080/10402381.2016.1211142
  19. Kaneko, H. (2026). Deep autoencoder for low dimensionality for high dimensional data in regression models and direct inverse analysis of models. Analytical Sciences, 42, 567–576. doi:10.1007/s44211-026-00904-2
  20. Karimadini, K., & Pourebrahim, S. (2026). Simulation of long-term spatio-temporal environmental dynamics using a unified benchmark of neighbor augmenting, LSTM and graph attention models. Scientific Reports. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-56762-5
  21. Kok, J. F., Parteli, E. J., Michaels, T. I., & Karam, D. B. (2012). The physics of wind-blown sand and dust. Reports on Progress in Physics, 75(10), 106901. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106901
  22. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774.
  23. Miri, A., Rahdari, V., & Baas, A. C. (2025). Spatial and temporal variability of dust flux in Sistan and its response to climate and vegetation controls. Catena, 253, 108880. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2025.108880
  24. Mohammadi, A., Lak, R., Schwamborn, G., Kaveh Firouz, A., Çiner, A., & Khatouni, J. D. (2021). Depositional environments and salt-thickness variations in Urmia Lake (NW Iran): Insight from sediment-core studies. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 91(3), 296–316. doi:10.2110/jsr.2020.078
  25. Mountrakis, G., Im, J., & Ogole, C. (2011). Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(3), 247–259. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001
  26. Mutawa, A. M., Alshaibani, A., & Almatar, L. A. (2025). A comprehensive review of dust storm detection and prediction techniques: Leveraging satellite data, ground observations and machine learning. IEEE Access, 13, 39694–39710. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3541075
  27. Namdari, S., Karimi, N., & Sorooshian, A. (2021). Impacts of climate and synoptic fluctuations on dust storm activity over the Middle East. Atmospheric Environment, 259, 118510. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118510
  28. Panahi, M., Yariyan, P., Rezaie, F., Kim, S. W., Sharifi, A., Alesheikh, A. A., & Lee, S. (2022). Spatial modeling of radon potential mapping using deep learning algorithms. Geocarto International, 37(25), 9560–9582. doi:10.1080/10106049.2022.2040602
  29. Pouri, N., Karimi, B., Kolivand, A., & Mirhoseini, S. H. (2024). Ambient dust pollution with all-cause, cardiovascular and respiratory mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 912, 168945. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168945
  30. Proestakis, E., Papachristopoulou, K., Georgiou, T., Chatoutsidou, S. E., Lazaridis, M., Gkikas, A., et al. (2025). Atmospheric dust and air quality over large-cities and megacities of the world. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 25, 14777–14823. doi:10.5194/acp-25-14777-2025
  31. Shadkam, S., Ludwig, F., van Oel, P., Kirmit, Ç., & Kabat, P. (2016). Impacts of climate change and water resources development on the declining inflow into Iran's Urmia Lake. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 42(5), 942–952. doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.07.033
  32. Shao, Y., Wyrwoll, K. H., Chappell, A., Huang, J., Lin, Z., McTainsh, G. H., et al. (2011). Dust cycle: An emerging core theme in Earth system science. Aeolian Research, 2(4), 181–204. doi: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2011.02.001
  33. Shokri, N., Robinson, D. A., Afshar, M., Alewell, C., Aminzadeh, M., Arthur, E., et al. (2025). Rethinking global soil degradation: Drivers, impacts, and solutions. Reviews of Geophysics, 63(4), e2025RG000883. doi:10.1029/2025RG000883
  34. Teng, F., Ekraminia, S. S., Zarei, A., & Li, Y. (2026). Remote sensing-based landslide prediction and risk assessment using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model. Scientific Reports, 16, 10687. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-43927-5
  35. Thankappan, S., Govindan, R., Chandrasekar, U. D., & Arunachalam, S. J. (2026). Automated feature extraction for disaster monitoring using U-Net architecture: Enhancing real-time response and recovery through deep learning. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 10(2), 476–483.
  36. Tucker, C. J., Pinzon, J. E., Brown, M. E., Slayback, D. A., Pak, E. W., Mahoney, R., Vermote, E. F., & El Saleous, N. (2005). An extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(20), 4485–4498. doi:10.1080/01431160500168686
  37. Wang, J., & Hua, C. (2026). An artificial intelligence model for sand and dust storm forecast driven by AI weather forecasts. npj Clean Air, 2, 10. doi:10.1038/s44407-025-00048-z
  38. Wang, Z., & Han, R. (2025). Deep learning for 3D reconstruction and trajectory prediction of dust and polluted aerosols in educational environments. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13, 1582806. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2025.1582806
  39. Yarmohamadi, M., Alesheikh, A. A., & Sharif, M. (2025). Using hybrid deep learning models to predict dust storm pathways with enhanced accuracy. Climate, 13(1), 16. doi:10.3390/cli13010016
  40. 40 Yariyan, P., Amiri, M., Saffariha, M., Avand, M., Ghiasi, S. S., & Tiefenbacher, J. P. (2022a). Spatial analysis of environmental factors influencing dust sources in the east of Iran using a new active-learning approach. Geocarto International, 37(26), 11929–11954. doi:10.1080/10106049.2022.2066209
  41. Yariyan, P., Avand, M., Omidvar, E., Pham, Q. B., Linh, N. T. T., & Tiefenbacher, J. P. (2022b). Optimization of statistical and machine learning hybrid models for groundwater potential mapping. Geocarto International, 37(13), 3877–3911. doi:10.1080/10106049.2021.1878291
  42. Yariyan, P., Feizizadeh, B., Blaschke, T., Yakar, M., & Karimzadeh, S. (2026). Integrating environmental predictors and deep learning approach for spatiotemporal dust storm risk mapping and impacts modeling on land, health and food security. International Journal of Digital Earth, 19(1), 2654262. doi:10.1080/17538947.2026.2654262
  43. Zhou, Z. H. (2021). Machine learning. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-1967-3
  44. Zhu, X. X., Tuia, D., Mou, L., Xia, G. S., Zhang, L., Xu, F., & Fraundorfer, F. (2017). Deep learning in remote sensing: A review. Proceedings of the IEEE, 105(10), 1865–1883. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2017.2721865