Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 85

The Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning with Academic Staff Readiness for Education 4.0

Pages
169–184
Publication Date
2020-02-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings: Results indicated that the academic staff and the university were ready to face the Education 4.0 challenges.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Purpose: Education 4.0 paves the way for a new form of the university where academicians teach, research and provide services in different ways, which raises the question of the readiness of academicians to face the challenges.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study attempts to explain to which extent the university and its academic staff are ready to face Education 4.0 challenges through the initiatives of knowledge management and organizational learning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings: Results indicated that the academic staff and the university were ready to face the Education 4.0 challenges.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler organizational learning · knowledge management practices · Education 4.0

Özet

Öz Purpose: Education 4.0 paves the way for a new form of the university where academicians teach, research and provide services in different ways, which raises the question of the readiness of academicians to face the challenges. This study attempts to explain to which extent the university and its academic staff are ready to face Education 4.0 challenges through the initiatives of knowledge management and organizational learning. Research Methods: Questionnaires were administered to all academic staff in one education university in Malaysia and 218 completed questionnaires were received and analyzed in this study. Data were collected using modified items from two sources to measure knowledge management and organizational learning practices at the university. Items for measuring staff readiness for Education 4.0 were developed based on criteria found in the recent literature. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. Findings: Results indicated that the academic staff and the university were ready to face the Education 4.0 challenges. The level of organizational learning practiced by the academic staff is high, the same as the knowledge management practiced by the university. Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that both organizational learning and knowledge management practices had significant positive relationships with the readiness of academic staff for Education 4.0. However, multiple regression analysis with stepwise procedures found that only one knowledge management practice and one organizational learning practice were the predictors of the readiness of the academic staff in facing the Education 4.0 challenges. Implications for Research and Practices: This study provides new insight into Education 4.0 through the perspective of knowledge management and organizational learning. Universities need to put more initiatives for knowledge creation, knowledge organization, knowledge storing, knowledge dissemination and knowledge application. Furthermore, academicians also need to put more effort into supporting new learning and ideas, formal learning and external/interface learning.

🔖

Cite This Article

ISHAK, R., MANSOR, M. (2020). The Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning with Academic Staff Readiness for Education 4.0. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 85, 169–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/132457

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abersek, B. (2017). Evolution of competences for new era or education 4.0. The XXV Conference of Czech Educational Research Association (CERA/ČAPV) on 13 - 14 September 2017. Argote. L., & Epple, D. (1990). Learning curves in manufacturing. Management Science, 247(4), 920-924.
  2. Argote, L., McEvily, B, & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science. 49(4), 571–582.
  3. Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011) Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge. Organization Science, 22, 1123-1137.
  4. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Bapuji, H., & Crossan, M. (2004). From questions to answers: reviewing organizational learning research. Management Learning, 35(4). 397-417.
  5. Bhatt, G. (2001). Knowledge management in organization: examining the interactions between technologies, techniques and people. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 68-75.
  6. Bratton, J.A. (2001). Why workers are reluctant learners. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(7/8), 333-344.
  7. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organizational Science, 2, 40-57.
  8. Cangelosi, V., & Dill, W. (1965) Organizational learning: Observations toward a theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(2), 175-203
  9. Chiva, R., & Habib, J. (2015). A framework for organizational learning: zero, adaptive and generative learning. Journal Of Management & Organization, 21(3), 350 - 368. Cyert, R., & March, J.G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Drucker, P.F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman. Findlay, P., McKinlay, A., Marks, A., & Thompson, P. (2000). Labouring to learn: organizational learning and mutual gains. Employee Relations, 22(5), 485-502.
  10. Fiol, C. and Lyles, M. (1985)
  11. Organizational learning, Academy of Management Review, 10, 803-813
  12. Fisk, P. (2019). Education 4.0: The future of learning will be dramatically different, in school and throughout life. Retrieved on January 12, 2019 from http://www.thegeniusworks.com/2017/01/future-education-young-everyone-taught-together/.
  13. Flores, L., Zheng, W., Rau, D., & Thomas, C. (2012). Organisational learning: subprocess identification, construct validation, and an empirical test of cultural antecedents. Journal of Management, 38(2), 640-66