Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 85

The Development of Moral and Social Judgments: Social Contexts and Processes of Coordination

Pages
23–44
Publication Date
2020-02-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Anthropological research documents that females engage in acts of opposition and moral resistance regarding perceived unfair cultural practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The research presented in this essay is grounded in Social Domain Theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research provides substantial evidence that children’s social development is characterized by the formation of distinctly different systems of thought, including those in the moral, social-conventional, and personal domains.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Anthropological research documents that females engage in acts of opposition and moral resistance regarding perceived unfair cultural practices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler domains · morality · coordination

Özet

Öz The research presented in this essay is grounded in Social Domain Theory. Research provides substantial evidence that children’s social development is characterized by the formation of distinctly different systems of thought, including those in the moral, social-conventional, and personal domains. A main focus here is on morality, defined as involving understandings of welfare, justice, and rights, which are applied across societal contexts. Social conventions are uniformities within social systems, serving to provide uniform expectations. The domains constitute different configurations of thinking and developmental changes occur within each domain. However, decisions in social situational contexts often involve coordination, which is a process of weighing and balancing different and sometimes conflicting considerations. Such social contexts can include conflicts between different moral goals or between moral and societal goals. Processes of coordination are examined in social psychological experiments, as well as developmental studies of topics like honesty, rights, and social inclusion. Coordination is also considered in people’s perspectives on cultural practices of unfairness and inequality. Psychological research in patriarchal societies shows that females, who are subjected to inequalities evaluate those cultural practices as unfair. Anthropological research documents that females engage in acts of opposition and moral resistance regarding perceived unfair cultural practices.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURIEL, E., BANAS, K. A. (2020). The Development of Moral and Social Judgments: Social Contexts and Processes of Coordination. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 85, 23–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/132455

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. E. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137–162).
  2. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
  3. Abu-Lughod, L. (1993). Writing women’s worlds: Bedouin stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  4. Asch, S. E. (1952).
  5. Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Banas, K. A. (2019). Revisiting Moral Reasoning in the Context of NCAA Sport. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research, and applications (Vol. 1, pp. 71-129).
  6. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. New York: Worth Publishers.
  7. Baumrind, D. (1989). Rearing competent children. In W. Damon (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 349–378). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Boardley, I., & Kavussanu, M. (2010). Effects of goal orientation and perceived value of toughness on antisocial behavior in soccer: The mediating role or moral disengagement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32, 176-192.
  8. Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Vintage Books. Bredemeier, B. J., & Shields, D. L., (1984). Divergence in moral reasoning about sport and everyday life. Sociology of Sport Journal, 1, 348-357.
  9. Bredemeier, B. J., & Shields, D. L. (1986). Moral growth among athletes and nonathletes: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 147(1), 7-18.
  10. Conry-Murray, C. (2009). Adolescent and adult reasoning about gender roles and fairness in Benin, West Africa. Cognitive Development, 24, 207-219.
  11. Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.
  12. Dahl, A., Gingo, M., Uttich, K., & Turiel, E. (2018). Moral reasoning about human welfare in adolescents and adults: Judging conflicts involving sacrificing and saving lives. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 83 (3, Serial No. 330). Day, K. (2014). The right to literacy and cultural change: Zulu adolescents in post-apartheid rural South Africa. Cognitive Development, 29, 81–94.
  13. Dworkin, R. M. (1977).
  14. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: H