Journals / Yükseköğretim Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

Psychological abuse (mobbing) in higher education and legal measures in the world and in Turkey

Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimde Psikolojik Taciz (Mobing) ve Yasal Mevzuat

Pages
151–158
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is to put forth the legalsolutions of the prevalent problem of mobbing, to identify the point atwhich it has reached by giving examples from higher education organisations and to make suggestions by looking at the position of Turkey within the world in terms of coping with this phenomenon

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today’s world, where everything changes rapidly every day, pushes theindividuals and the institutions, including the educational organisations,into a struggle in which they have to survive and be a part of.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However,the continuity of this situation causes some disagreements among theemployers and the employees or among colleagues which are difficult tocope with, and it may even come to a point where the psychological andthe physical health of the victim are affected negatively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is to put forth the legalsolutions of the prevalent problem of mobbing, to identify the point atwhich it has reached by giving examples from higher education organisations and to make suggestions by looking at the position of Turkey within the world in terms of coping with this phenomenon
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Today’s world, where everything changes rapidly every day, pushes theindividuals and the institutions, including the educational organisations,into a struggle in which they have to survive and be a part of. However,the continuity of this situation causes some disagreements among theemployers and the employees or among colleagues which are difficult tocope with, and it may even come to a point where the psychological andthe physical health of the victim are affected negatively. This phenomenonis known as “mobbing” or “bullying” in the international literature and as“psychological abuse at work place” or “daunting someone and causinghim to run away” in the national literature. It does not only cause individual loses and financial and human resources loses to higher educationorganisations, but also deals a serious blow to the effectiveness and reputation of an organization. The aim of this study is to put forth the legalsolutions of the prevalent problem of mobbing, to identify the point atwhich it has reached by giving examples from higher education organisations and to make suggestions by looking at the position of Turkey within the world in terms of coping with this phenomenon

Özet

Her şeyin çok hızla değiştiği günümüz dünyası, eğitim örgütleri de dahilolmak üzere kurumları ve bu kurumlarda çalışan bireyleri, devamlılıklarını sürdürebilmek adına, bir mücadelenin içine sokmakta ve bu hızlı çarkın birer parçası haline getirmektedir. Ancak bu durumun sürekliliği, işveren ve çalışan veya çalışan ve iş arkadaşları arasında baş edilmesi hiç dekolay olmayan bazı anlaşmazlıklar yaratmakta, hatta mağdur kişinin psikolojisini ve beden sağlığını bozma noktasına gelmektedir. Bahsi geçendurum uluslararası alan yazında "mobbing", "bullying" olarak geçerken,Türkçede "işyerinde psikolojik taciz" ya da "yıldırkaçır" olarak yer bulmaktadır. Bireysel zararlarının yanında yüksek öğretim kurumlarına damaddi kayıplar ve insan kaynakları kayıpları yaşatırken, kurumun etkililiğine ve itibarına da ciddi şekilde sekte vurmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı,hem dünyada hem de Türkiye'de çok yaygın bir şekilde karşılaşılan mobing sorununun yasal boyuttaki çözüm yollarını ortaya koymak, yüksekeğitim örgütlerinden örneklerle konunun vardığı noktayı saptamak veTürkiye'nin sorunla baş etmede dünyanın neresinde olduğunu tespit ederek önerilerde bulunmaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEMİR, B. (2012). Psychological abuse (mobbing) in higher education and legal measures in the world and in Turkey. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 151–158. https://ajindex.com/articles/132403

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adams, A. (1992). Bullying at work: How to confinnt it and overcome it. London: Virago Press.
  2. Akgeyik, T., Güngör, M., Uşan, Ş. ve Omay, U. (2007). İşyerinde psikolojik taciz fenomeni: Uluslararası deneyinıler ve perspektifler. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, Prof. Dr. Haşmet Başar’a Armağan Özel Sayısı. Akın, E. (2009). Cinsel ve duygusal tacizi patronlar onleyecek. 23 Mart 2012 tarihinde adresinden erişildi. Bilgel, N, Aytaç, S. ve Bayram, N. (2006). Bullying in Turkish white—collar workers. Occupational Medicine, 56, 226-231.
  3. Boynton, P. (2005). Unpacking my research on bullying in higher education. [Cited in McKay, R., Huberman Arnold, D, and Fratzl, J, and Thomas, R. (2008). Workplace bullying in academia: Canadian study. Employee Responsihilities and Rights journal, 20, 77-100].
  4. Catanzariti, J. (2006). Record awardfor damages regarding workplace bullying. Ekim 2012 tarihinde adresinden erişildi. Catanzariti, J., and Byrnes, M. (2006). Major tribunal decisions in 2005. journal ofIndustrial Relations, 48, 35 7-368.
  5. Chappel, D., and di Martino, V. (2006). Violence at work (3rd ed.). Geneva: International Labour Office. [Cited in P. Collins, Violence in the workplace. The RoSPA Occupational Safety Health journal] Einarsen, S. and Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. European journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 185—201. [Cited in D. Lewis (2004). Bullying at work: The impact of shame among university and college lecturers. British journal of Guidance Counselling, 32(3), 281-299.]
  6. Ferris, PA. (2009). The role of the consulting psychologist in the prevention, detection, and correction of bullying and mobbing in the workplace. Consulting Psychology journal: Practice and Research, 61 (3), 169-189.
  7. Gökçek Karaca, N. (2009). AB ülkelerinde işyerinde psikolojik tacizin boyut— ları, psikolojik tacizle mücadele ve bu mücadelede sendikaların rolü. Çimento İşveren, 23(5), 26-45.
  8. Gün, H. (2011). Mobbing uygulayan dekana ceza. 23 Mart 2012 tarihinde adresinden erişildi. Hall, PS. (2 005). Bullying and the teacher. The Delm Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 72(1). Harthill, S. (2008). Bullying in the workplace: Lessons from the United Kingdom. Minnesota journal ofInternational Law, 17(2), 247-302.
  9. Hoel, H., and Einarsen, S. (2010). Shortcomings of anti—bullying regulations: the case of Sweden. European journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 19(1), 30-50.
  10. House of Commons. (2003). Workpla