SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3

MEANINGLESSNESS OF LIFE IN THE WORKS NAMED WAITING FOR GODOT AND CLINTON GODSON

GODOT’YU BEKLERKEN VE CLINTON GODSON ADLI ESERLERDE YAŞAMIN ANLAMSIZLIĞI

Elmas Şahin
Pages
1713–1728
Publication Date
2018-09-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study focused on the concepts absurdity and meaninglessness of life in Beckett‟s and Erbil‟s works, the endless waitings and questionings that have no solutions aside from absurd and meaningless conversations, in other words futile questionings and waitings ironically covered the both works will be discussed and evaluated in the light of the method of comparative literature

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article is a comparative study of Waiting for Godot (1948) by Samuel Beckett and Clinton Godson (1970) by Leyla Erbil.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The first one is an absurd play; the second one is a short absurd story that the traditional forms in modern literature were rejected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study focused on the concepts absurdity and meaninglessness of life in Beckett‟s and Erbil‟s works, the endless waitings and questionings that have no solutions aside from absurd and meaningless conversations, in other words futile questionings and waitings ironically covered the both works will be discussed and evaluated in the light of the method of comparative literature
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anlamsızlık · saçma · ironi

Abstract

This article is a comparative study of Waiting for Godot (1948) by Samuel Beckett and Clinton Godson (1970) by Leyla Erbil. The first one is an absurd play; the second one is a short absurd story that the traditional forms in modern literature were rejected. In this study focused on the concepts absurdity and meaninglessness of life in Beckett‟s and Erbil‟s works, the endless waitings and questionings that have no solutions aside from absurd and meaningless conversations, in other words futile questionings and waitings ironically covered the both works will be discussed and evaluated in the light of the method of comparative literature

Özet

Bu makale Samuel Beckett‟ın Godot’yu Beklerken (1948) ile Leyla

🔖

Cite This Article

Şahin, E. (2018). MEANINGLESSNESS OF LIFE IN THE WORKS NAMED WAITING FOR GODOT AND CLINTON GODSON. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 1713–1728. https://ajindex.com/articles/1321024

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Beckett, S. (1952). En attendant Godot. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
  2. Bennett, M. Y. (2015). Cambridge Introduction to Theatre and Literature of the Absurd. The United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Camus, A. (1942). Le Mythe de Sisyphe. Paris: Les Éditions Gallimard.
  4. Erbil, L. (1984 ). “Clinton Godson”, Eski Sevgili. İstanbul: Adam Yay.
  5. Esslin, M. (1972). The Theatre of the Absurd. London: Pelican Books.
  6. Hassan, I. (1961). Radical Innocence, the Contemporary American Novel. New York: Harper and Row.
  7. Ionesco, E. (1962). Notes et contre-notes. Paris: Gallimard.
  8. Sartre, J. p. (1985). Varoluşçuluk, Çev. Asım Bezirci. İstanbul: SAY.
  9. Esslin, M. (1972). The Theatre of the Absurd. London: Pelican Books.