SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

EXAMINATION OF ADOLESCENTS’ PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOUR TENDENCIES IN TERMS OF SOME VARIABLES: A CITY SAMPLE

Samet Ata(AĞRI İBRAHİM ÇEÇEN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
İsmihan Zeliha Artan(HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY)
Pages
304–320
Publication Date
2021-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There are many variables that affect prosocial behaviours in general.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prosocial behaviours of high school students on some variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample group of the study consisted of 1401 high school students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There are many variables that affect prosocial behaviours in general.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Child development · high school students · prosocial behaviour

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prosocial behaviours of high school students on some variables. The sample group of the study consisted of 1401 high school students. Research is one of the quantitative research methods; this is a descriptive study conducted through correlational scanning to investigate the relationship between two or more variables and to obtain clues about cause and effect. According to the findings of the study, variables that have a significant relationship between at least one of the sub-dimensions of the Prosocial Tendency Scale (PTM-R) are as follows; gender, number of siblings, family and teacher help thinking status, grade level and type of high school. According to the meaningful differences found, the importance of prosocial tendencies is seen in students' lives. There are many variables that affect prosocial behaviours in general.

Özet

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prosocial behaviours of high school students on some variables. The sample group of the study consisted of 1401 high school students. Research is one of the quantitative research methods; this is a descriptive study conducted through correlational scanning to investigate the relationship between two or more variables and to obtain clues about cause and effect. According to the findings of the study, variables that have a significant relationship between at least one of the sub-dimensions of the Prosocial Tendency Scale (PTM-R) are as follows; gender, number of siblings, family and teacher help thinking status, grade level and type of high school. According to the meaningful differences found, the importance of prosocial tendencies is seen in students' lives. There are many variables that affect prosocial behaviours in general.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ata, S., Artan, İ. Z. (2021). EXAMINATION OF ADOLESCENTS’ PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOUR TENDENCIES IN TERMS OF SOME VARIABLES: A CITY SAMPLE. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 304–320. https://ajindex.com/articles/1320744

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Aktaş, V. & Güvenç, G. B. (2006). Kız ve erkek ergenlerde saldırgan ve olumlu sosyal davranışlar ile yaş, ilişkisel bağlam ve kişiler arası duyarlılık arasındaki ilişkiler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 233-264.
  2. Altun, D. (2019). 60-71 aylık okul öncesi dönemdeki çocukların alıcı ve ifade edici dil kelime bilgisinin teknoloji kullanımı ve ailesel faktörlere göre incelenmesi. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 8(2), 1158-1182.
  3. Ayas, T. & Pişkin, M. (2011). Lise öğrencileri arasındaki zorbalık olaylarının cinsiyet, sınıf düzeyi ve okul türü bakımından incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 10(2), 550-568.
  4. Bağcı, B. (2015). Çocuk ve yetişkin prososyallik ölçeklerinin geçerlik güvenirlik çalışmasi ve çocuk ile anne-baba prososyal davranışlari arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aydın: Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi.
  5. Batson, C. D. & Powell, A. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In I. B. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of Psychology (Vol. Volume 5). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0519
  6. Berndt, T. & Bulleit, T. (1985). Effects of sibling relationships on preschoolers' behavior at home and at school. Developmental psychology, 21(5), 761-767. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.5.761
  7. Boxer, P., Tisak, M. S. & Goldstein, S. E. (2004). Is it bad to be good? An exploration of aggressive and prosocial behavior subtypes in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(2), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000013421.02015.ef
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi. https://doi.org/10.14527/2240 Çaha, H. (2016). Ağrı ili kadın profili araştırması. KÜREL Akademi Eğitim Araştırma ve Danışmanlık.
  9. Carlo, G., Crockett, L. J., Randall, B. A., & Roesch, S. C. (2007). A latent growth curve analysis of prosocial behavior among rural adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(2), 301-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00524.x
  10. Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S. &Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431602239132
  11. Carlo, G. & Randall, B. A. (2002). The Development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1023/A:1014033032440
  12. Çekin, A. (2013). İmam hatip lisesi öğrencilerinin prososyal davranış eğilimleri üzerine nicel bir inceleme. Uluslararasi Sosyal Araştirmalar Dergisi, 6(28), 34-45.
  13. Creswell, W. J. (2013). Research design qualitative, quantitative and mixed research design 4th edition. SAGE Publications.
  14. DeCenzo, D. A. & Silhanek, B. (2002). Human relations: Personal and professional development. Prentice Hall. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=fZcQPwAACAAJ
  15. Dunn, J. & Munn, P. (1986). Siblings and the development of prosocial behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9(3), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502548600900301
  16. Eisenberg, N. (1982). The development of prosocial behavior. Academic Press. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=OK19AAAAMAAJ
  17. Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C. & Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. 15(3), 235-260. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00095.x
  18. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A. & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development, Vol. 3, 6th ed. (pp. 646-719). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  19. Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The Roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511571121
  20. Espinosa, M. P., Kovářík, J. (2015). Prosocial behavior and gender [Original Research]. 9(88). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00088
  21. Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., Kupanoff, K. & Laible, D. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431699019001001
  22. George, D. & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step (14th edition). Taylor & Francis.
  23. Grusec, J. E. & Hastings, P. D. (2007). Handbook of socialization: Theory and research. Guilford Press.
  24. Hamre, B. K. & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625-638. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1132418
  25. Hardy, S. A. (2006). Identity, reasoning and emotion: An empirical comparison of three sources of moral motivation [doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9034-9]. Motivation and Emotion, 30(3), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9034-9
  26. Hart, D. & Carlo, G. (2005). Moral development in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00094.x
  27. Hoffman, M. L. & Levine, L. E. (1976). Early sex differences in empathy [doi:10.1037/0012-1649.12.6.557]. Developmental psychology, 12(6), 557-558. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.12.6.557
  28. Horzum, M. B. & Aras, T. (2011). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin sanal zorba ve mağdur olma düzeylerinin okul türü ve cinsiyet açısından incelenmesi. Journal of Educational Sciences & Practices, 10(20), 139-159.
  29. House, B. R., Silk, J. B., Henrich, J., Barrett, H. C., Scelza, B. A., Boyette, A. H., Hewlett, B. S., McElreath, R. & Laurence, S. (2013). Ontogeny of prosocial behavior across diverse societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(36), 14586- 14591. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221217110
  30. Hughes, C., McHarg, G. & White, N. (2018). Sibling influences on prosocial behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 96-101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.015
  31. Israel, G. D. (1992). Determining sample size. University of Florida.
  32. Iverson, E. (2010). Helping others helps me: prosocial behavior as a function of identity development and self-regulation in emerging adulthood. Journal of Gustavus Undergraduate Psychology, 6(1).