SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3

A STYLISTIC INVESTIGATION INTO THE POEMS OF THE MENTALLY ILL PATIENTS

RUHSAL HASTALIĞI OLAN BİREYLERİN ŞİİRLERİNİN BİÇEM BİLİMSEL İNCELEMESİ

Ruhan Güçlü(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Esra Küçüksakarya(NECMETTIN ERBAKAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3103-9608
Pages
769–793
Publication Date
2026-09-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings suggest that figurative language shapes how patients express their inner lives, consistent with Pennebaker et al.’s (2003) view that unconscious states surface in language and with Bakare’s (2009) observation that poetic expression can disclose aspects of mental life not easily conveyed directly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine the use of figurative language in Akıl Hastalarının Yazdıkları Şiirler: İnilti (1964), a collection of poems written by patients with mental illness, from a stylistic perspective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using Leech and Short’s (2007) stylistics checklist, the analysis focuses on tropes of comparison (metaphor, simile, personification, apostrophe), association (metonymy, synecdoche, symbol, allegory), and contrast (paradox, hyperbole, litotes, irony).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings suggest that figurative language shapes how patients express their inner lives, consistent with Pennebaker et al.’s (2003) view that unconscious states surface in language and with Bakare’s (2009) observation that poetic expression can disclose aspects of mental life not easily conveyed directly.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Biçem bilim · söz sanatları · değişmeceli anlatım

Abstract

This study aims to examine the use of figurative language in Akıl Hastalarının Yazdıkları Şiirler: İnilti (1964), a collection of poems written by patients with mental illness, from a stylistic perspective. Using Leech and Short’s (2007) stylistics checklist, the analysis focuses on tropes of comparison (metaphor, simile, personification, apostrophe), association (metonymy, synecdoche, symbol, allegory), and contrast (paradox, hyperbole, litotes, irony). The qualitative analysis of 112 poems shows dense, and at times unconventional, figurative patterns: metaphors and similes translate inner unrest into concrete images, personification and apostrophe blur the boundary between self and world, and associative or contrastive tropes reorganize fragmented experiences into symbolic forms. The findings suggest that figurative language shapes how patients express their inner lives, consistent with Pennebaker et al.’s (2003) view that unconscious states surface in language and with Bakare’s (2009) observation that poetic expression can disclose aspects of mental life not easily conveyed directly.

Özet

Bu çalışma, ruhsal hastalığı olan bireyler tarafından yazılan şiirlerden oluşan Akıl Hastalarının Yazdıkları Şiirler: İnilti (1964) kitabındaki eğretilemeli dil kullanımını biçem bilimsel bir bakış açısıyla incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Leech ve Short’un (2007) biçembilimsel kontrol listesinden yararlanılarak yapılan çözümleme, karşılaştırma (eğretileme, benzetme, kişileştirme, hitap), çağrışım (düzdeğişmece, düzdeğiştirmece, simge, kinaye) ve karşıtlık (çelişki, abartma, küçültme, tersinleme) değişmecelerine odaklanmaktadır. Toplam 112 şiirin nitel çözümlemesi, yoğun ve zaman zaman sıra dışı eğretilemeli örüntüler sergilendiğini göstermektedir: Eğretileme ve benzetmeler içsel çalkantıları somut imgeler hâline getirirken, kişileştirme ve hitap benlik ile dış dünya arasındaki çizgiyi bulanıklaştırmakta; çağrışımsal ya da karşıtlık temelli değişmeceler ise parçalı deneyimleri simgesel biçimlere dönüştürmektedir. Bulgular değişmeceli anlatımın ruhsal hastaların iç dünyalarını ifade etme biçimlerini belirlediğini ortaya koymakta; bu durum, bilinç dışı süreçlerin dile yansıdığını savunan Pennebaker ve diğerlerinin (2003) görüşüyle ve şiirsel ifadenin doğrudan dile getirilemeyen ruhsal boyutları açığa çıkarabileceğini belirten Bakare’nin (2009) yorumuyla örtüşmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güçlü, R., Küçüksakarya, E. (2026). A STYLISTIC INVESTIGATION INTO THE POEMS OF THE MENTALLY ILL PATIENTS. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3, 769–793. https://doi.org/10.7884/teke.1792171

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (63)

  1. Adamczyk, P., Biczak, J., Kotlarska, K., Daren, A., & Cichocki, Ł. (2023). On the specificity of figurative language comprehension impairment in schizophrenia and its relation to cognitive skills but not psychopathological symptoms: Study on metaphor, humor and irony. Schizophrenia Research: Cognition, 34, 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2023.100294
  2. Al-Janabi, M. K. H. (2015). A stylistic analysis of two selected, English and Arabic, war poems. Journal of the College of Languages (JCL), 31, 202-225. https://jcl.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq/index.php/JCLUM/article/view/143
  3. Alkan, H. (2023). A stylistic approach to Thomas Campion’s There Is a Garden in Her Face. Folklor/Edebiyat, 29(115), 901-912. https://doi.org/10.22559/folklor.2402
  4. Al-Qudsy, W. B. (2016). A stylistic analysis of figures of speech in The Jakarta Post headlines under the issue of KPK vs. POLRI (Published MA Thesis). Yogyakarta State University. http://eprints.uny.ac.id/37913/
  5. Amare, A. (2002). Some selected poems in English by Ethiopian poets: A stylistic analysis (Master’s thesis). Addis Ababa University. http://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/123456789/2220
  6. Bakare, M. O. (2009). Morbid and insight poetry: A glimpse at schizophrenia through the window of poetry. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 4(3), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401380903192671
  7. Bethlehem, L. S. (1996). Simile and figurative language. Poetics Today, 17(2), 203-240. https://doi.org/10.2307/1773211
  8. Bezar, L., Iqbal, M., & Hussain, S. (2023). Stylistic analysis of humour in Pakistani English fiction: Linguistic deviation as a comic strategy. Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 14(2), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jlls.2023.002
  9. Bezar, S. A., Sadiq, M., Zehra, S., Azhar, M. A., & Mohsin, L. A. (2023). Negotiating cultural hybridity and liminality in Kashua’s Second Person Singular: A Bhabhaian analysis. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 20(2), 295-306. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/11697
  10. Bezar, S. A., Yıldız, T., & Khan, M. (2023). Linguistic deviation and humour in contemporary Pakistani fiction: A stylistic analysis. Journal of Literary Semantics, 52(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2022-2063
  11. Bleuler, E. (1950). Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenias (J. Zinkin, Trans.). International Universities. (Original work published 1911).
  12. Carston, R., & Wearing, C. (2015). Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 79, 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.011
  13. Chin, J. M., Benjamin, C., & Levitt, J. (2011). Semantic network dysfunction in schizophrenia: A cognitive-linguistic review. Schizophrenia Research, 131(1-3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2011.05.019
  14. Civelek, D. (2022). The detailed analysis of ‘The Black Cat’ by Edgar Allan Poe in stylistic perspective. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.698487
  15. Colston, H. L., & Gibbs Jr., R. W. (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1701_5
  16. Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Blackwell.
  17. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane, Trans.). University of Minnesota. (Original work published 1972).
  18. Despot, K. Š., Sekulić Sović, M., Vilibić, M., & Mimica, N. (2021). Metaphor production by patients with schizophrenia-A case analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 36(3), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1893606
  19. Düzdemir, Ş. (2025). James Joyce’un Eveline adlı öyküsünde bilişsel biçembilimsel çözümlemeler ve okur etkileşimleri. Dilbilimi Alanında Uluslararası Araştırmalar-II, içinde (s. 39-48). Eğitim.
  20. Düzdemir, Ş., & Can, Ö. (2020). Şair burada ne demek istiyor? Bilişsel Şiirbilim çerçevesinde şiirsel yeterlilik. International Journal of Language Academy, 8(5), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.29228/ijla.46569
  21. Elvevåg, B., Helsen, K., De Hert, M., Sweers, K., & Storms, G. (2011). Metaphor interpretation and use: A window into semantics in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 133(1-3), 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2011.07.009
  22. Enkvist, N. E. (1973). Linguistic stylistics. Mouton.
  23. Finch, G. (2000). Linguistic terms and concepts. Palgrave Macmillan.
  24. Forrest, D. V. (1965). Poiesis and the language of schizophrenia. Psychiatry, 28(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1965.11023413
  25. Görmez, A., & Tunç, R. A. (2021). Literary theory, stylistics and cognitive poetics. Çankaya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 15(1), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.47777/cankujhss.874598
  26. Güçlü, R. (2025). Stylistic deviations in ‘I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud’ and its Turkish translation. In A. Kırkan & Y. Cengiz (Eds.), Dilbilim ve karşılaştırmalı edebiyat: Dilbilim. Mardin Artuklu University.
  27. Güner, B., & Suayin, R. (2024). A stylistic analysis of the poem ‘Ne Çıkar Bahtımızda, Ayrılık Varsa Yarın’ by Gündoğdu Duran. Uluslararası Beşeri Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi, 10(23), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.65092/ijhe.2024.23.145
  28. Hankir, A. K., Holloway, D., Agius, M., & Zaman, R. (2012). ‘The verses of madness’: Schizophrenia and poetry. BMJ Case Reports, 2012, bcr2012007499. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2012-007499
  29. Holmes, J. A. (2008). Mentalisation and metaphor in poetry and psychotherapy. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 14(3), 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.107.003723
  30. Hua, Y. S. (2013). Ti-Yong and the art of embodiment: Of schizophrenia and the synecdoche (Master’s thesis). National University of Singapore. https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/43991
  31. Hussein, A. M., & Al-Saidi, A. (2024). A stylistic analysis of nature in two selected, English and Arabic, pastoral poems. Al-Adab Journal, 149, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i149.4530
  32. Iakimova, G., Passerieux, C., Laurent, J. P., & Hardy-Baylé, M. C. (2006). Impact of metaphor production and comprehension on verbal communication in schizophrenia. Psychopathology, 39(5), 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1159/000093779
  33. Iqbal, R., Ashraf, H., & Javeed, M. F. (2024). Examining language features in Plath’s poetry: A feministic stylistic analysis. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 8(2), 465-472. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2024(8-II)41
  34. Jaafar, E. A. (2014). A stylistic analysis of two selected poems. Journal of the College of Education for Women, 25(1), 238-248. https://jcoeduw.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/journal/article/view/538
  35. Kılınç, M. C., & Güçlü, R. (2026). Translating multilingual foregrounding in A Study in Scarlet: A comparative analysis based on Leech’s theory of stylistic deviation. İstanbul Üniversitesi Çeviribilim Dergisi / Istanbul University Journal of Translation Studies, (24), 142-168. https://doi.org/10.26650/iujts.2026.1774367
  36. Langdon, R., Coltheart, M., Ward, P. B., & Catts, S. (2002). Disturbed communication in schizophrenia: The role of poor pragmatics and poor mind-reading. Psychological Medicine, 32(7), 1273-1284. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291702006396
  37. Leader, D. (2011). What is madness? Penguin.
  38. Leech, G. N. (1969). A linguistic guide to English poetry. Longman.
  39. Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.
  40. Lehman, P. W. (1996). Descriptive linguistics: An introduction. Random House.
  41. Malabou, C. (2020). Masks and symbols: In between paranoia and schizophrenia. Portable Gray, 3(2), 217-223. https://portablegray.hcommons.org/malabou-masks-and-symbols/
  42. Muhammed, Q. T., & Sharhan, K. S. (2022). A gender-based stylistic analysis of selected English love poems. Al-Adab Journal, 141, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i141.3369
  43. Mukařovský, J. (1964). Standard language and poetic language. In P. L. Garvin (Eds.), A Prague school reader on esthetics, literary structure and style (pp. 17-30). Georgetown University.
  44. Parnas, J., & Sass, L. A. (2003). Self, consciousness, and schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29(3), 427-444. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007017
  45. Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2003). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  46. Rhodes, J. E., & Jakes, S. (2004). The contribution of metaphor and metonymy to delusions. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 77(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608304322874227
  47. Romme, M., & Escher, S. (1993). Accepting voices. MIND.
  48. Ross, T. A. (2025). Schizophrenia, the creative process, & the loss of self. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 38(1), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/08893675.2024.2435001
  49. Sass, L. A., & Parnas, J. (2003). Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29(3), 427-444. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007017
  50. Sayakhan, N. I. (2016). The use of personification and apostrophe as facilitators in teaching poetry. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 4(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20160401.12
  51. Semino, E. (2002). Stylistics and linguistic variation in poetry. Journal of English Linguistics, 30(1), 28-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/007242030001004
  52. Short, M. (1996). Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. Longman.
  53. Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. Routledge.
  54. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2012). A deflationary account of metaphors. In D. Wilson & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 97-122). Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.007
  55. Syal, P., & Jindal, D. V. (2010). An introduction to linguistics: Language, grammar and semantics. Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.
  56. Titchkosky, T. (2015). Life with dead metaphors: Impairment rhetoric in social justice praxis. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2015.1
  57. Tuncer, B. (1964). Akıl hastalarının yazdıkları şiirler: İnilti. Matbaa Teknisyenleri.
  58. Turan, T. (2022). Bu ‘yollar’ ‘o belde’ye çıkar mı?: Gösterge-biçembilim düzleminde Ahmet Haşim şiirlerinde özgöndergesellik. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 62(2), 1445-1464. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2022.62.2.27
  59. Van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. Croom Helm.
  60. Verdonk, P. (2002). Stylistics. Oxford University.
  61. Wales, K. (2001). A dictionary of stylistics (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
  62. Woods, A. (2011). Beyond the wounded storyteller: Rethinking narratives of illness and disability. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 5(2), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2011.7
  63. Woods, A. (2013). The limits of narrative: Provocations for the medical humanities. Medical Humanities, 37(2), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2011-010045