Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

THE ANALYSIS OF FISHER EFFECT USING TURKISH DATA

FISHER ETKİSİNİN TÜRKİYE VERİLERİ İLE TESTİ

Pages
99–111
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results support the Fisher effect

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the Fisher effect, which claims that there is one to one long-term relationship between the inflation rate and the long-term nominal interest rate, has been tested using Turkish quarterly data over the 1987 I - 2004 4 periods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Here, ARDL bounds testing approach to cointegration newly developed by Pesaran et al. 2001 in applied econometrics is used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results support the Fisher effect
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Faiz Oranı · Enflasyon · Fisher Etkisi

Abstract

In this study, the Fisher effect, which claims that there is one to one long-term relationship between the inflation rate and the long-term nominal interest rate, has been tested using Turkish quarterly data over the 1987 I - 2004 4 periods. Here, ARDL bounds testing approach to cointegration newly developed by Pesaran et al. 2001 in applied econometrics is used. Results support the Fisher effect

Özet

Bu çalışmada, uzun dönemli faiz oranı ile enflasyon oranı arasında bire birlik uzun dönemli bir ilişkinin mevcut olduğunu ifade eden Fisher etkisi, 1987 I -2004 4 dönemine ilişkin Türkiye ekonomisi verileri kullanılarak test edilmektedir. Çalışmada, uygulamalı ekonometride Pesaran vd. 2001 tarafından yeni geliştirilen eşbütünleşmeye ARDL autoregressive distributed lag yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, Fisher etkisini desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİMŞEK, M., KADILAR, C. (2006). THE ANALYSIS OF FISHER EFFECT USING TURKISH DATA. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 99–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/131875

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. ATKINS, F.J. (1989). Co-integration, error correction and the Fisher effect, Applied Economics, 21, pp.1611-1620.
  2. ATKINS, F. & SERLETIS, A. (2003). Bound Tests of the Gibson Paradox and the Fisher Effect: Evidence from Low-Frequency International Data, The Manchester School, 71(6), pp.673-679.
  3. BERUMENT, H. & JELASSI, M.M. (2002). The Fisher hypothesis: a cross-country analysis, Applied Economics, 34, pp.1645-1655.
  4. BEWLEY, R. A. (1979). The Direct Estimation of the Equilibrium Response in a Linear Dynamic Model, Economics Letters,.3, pp.357-61.
  5. BONHAM, C. S. (1991) Correct Cointegration Test of the Long Run Relationship Between Nominal Interest and Inflation, Applied Economics, 23, pp.1487-1492.
  6. ENGLE, R.F. & GRANGER, C.V.J. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing, Econometrica, 55, pp.251-276.
  7. DUTT, S. D. & GHOSH, D. (1995). The Fisher Hypothesis: Examining the Canadian Experience, Applied Economics, 27, pp.1025-1030.
  8. GARCIA, M.G.P. (1993) The Fisher effect in a signal exraction frameworkt, Journal of Development Economics, 41, pp.71-93.
  9. GRANVILLE, B. & MALLICK, S. (2004). Fisher hypothesis: UK Evidence over a century, Applied Economics, 25, pp.839-843.
  10. HARRIS, R. (1995). Using Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modelling, Prentice Hall, London, New York. HAWTREY, K.M. (1997). The Fisher Effect and Australian Interest Rates, Applied Financial Economics Letters, 11, pp.87-90.
  11. INDER, B. & SILVAPULLE, P. (1993). Does the Fisher Effect Apply in Australia?, Applied Economics, 25, pp.839-843.
  12. JACQUES, K. (1995).
  13. Unit Roots, Interest Rate Spreads and Inflation Forecasts, Applied Economics, 27, pp.605-608.
  14. JOHANSEN, S. (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(1), pp.231-54.
  15. JOHANSEN, S. & JUSELIUS, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application to the demand for money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, pp.69-206.
  16. JUNTTILA, J. (2001). Testing an Augmented Fisher Hypothesis for a Small Open Economy: The Case of Finland, Journal of Macroeconomics, 23(4), pp.577-599.
  17. KOUSTAS, Z. & SERLETIS, A. (1999).
  18. On the Fisher Effect, Journal of Monetary Economics, 44, pp.105-130.
  19. KREMERS, J.J.M, ERICSSON, N.L. & DOLADO, J.J. (1992).
  20. The Power of Cointegration Tests, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, pp.325- 348. MAH, J. S. (2000). An Empirical Examination of the Disaggregated Import Demand of Korea – the