Journals / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 4 Issue: 1

Plant Biodiversity Governance in Turkey

Pages
—
Publication Date
2017-01-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For proper governance of biological sources, support of research activities concerning sustainable use of biodiversity at all levels, together with proper and effective environmental planning are needed .  

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biodiversity is an indispensable source to meet the basic needs of human being, notably food and nutrition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Turkish people traditionally depend on biodiversity and developed many traditions and customs associated with biodiversity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For proper governance of biological sources, support of research activities concerning sustainable use of biodiversity at all levels, together with proper and effective environmental planning are needed .  
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Plant biodiversity · Turkey · biodiversity governance

Abstract

Biodiversity is an indispensable source to meet the basic needs of human being, notably food and nutrition. Turkish people traditionally depend on biodiversity and developed many traditions and customs associated with biodiversity. Therefore, its management and conservation is of particular importance for Turkey. Biodiversity is diminishing due to several reasons most of which are human-induced activities. Agricultural areas are shrinking, soil and water resources are rapidly being polluted. In view of the ongoing population growth, it's inevitable to encounter with more serious environmental problems in the near future. The concept of governance is relatively new for Turkey. It is possible to speak of management rather than governance. Due to strong centralisation in issue of conservation and management of biodiversity, state alone played the major role ignoring the participation of stakeholders. Rio conventions can be considered as the starting point for the governance practices . Following the ratification of the Rio conventions , governance concept began to take place and implemented in biodiversity related plans, programs and practices. Despite the implementation of many environmental protection programs in accordance with this understanding , local public segments at large that have traditionally been excluded from governing the sources seem to be sceptical to the new approach. On the other hand non-governmental organizations are playing more active roles today for public awareness activities and participatory resource management. For proper governance of biological sources, support of research activities concerning sustainable use of biodiversity at all levels, together with proper and effective environmental planning are needed .  

Özet

Biodiversity is an indispensable source to meet the basic needs of human being, notably food and nutrition. Turkish people traditionally depend on biodiversity and developed many traditions and customs associated with biodiversity. Therefore, its management and conservation is of particular importance for Turkey. Biodiversity is diminishing due to several reasons most of which are human-induced activities. Agricultural areas are shrinking, soil and water resources are rapidly being polluted. In view of the ongoing population growth, it's inevitable to encounter with more serious environmental problems in the near future. The concept of governance is relatively new for Turkey. It is possible to speak of management rather than governance. Due to strong centralisation in issue of conservation and management of biodiversity, state alone played the major role ignoring the participation of stakeholders. Rio conventions can be considered as the starting point for the governance practices . Following the ratification of the Rio conventions , governance concept began to take place and implemented in biodiversity related plans, programs and practices. Despite the implementation of many environmental protection programs in accordance with this understanding , local public segments at large that have traditionally been excluded from governing the sources seem to be sceptical to the new approach. On the other hand non-governmental organizations are playing more active roles today for public awareness activities and participatory resource management. For proper governance of biological sources, support of research activities concerning sustainable use of biodiversity at all levels, together with proper and effective environmental planning are needed .

🔖

Cite This Article

Karagöz, A., Sabancı, C. O. (2017). Plant Biodiversity Governance in Turkey. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 4 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1317976

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Davis, P.H. 1965. Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands. V 1. Edingburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
  2. Ekim, T., Koyuncu, M., Erik, S. and İlarslan, L. 1989. List of rare, threatened and endemic plants in Turkey according to IUCN Red Data Book Categories. Turkish Association for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. No: 18. Ankara.
  3. Güloğlu, Y. 2010. The establishment of forest ownership and the legal regulations on the forests until the Tanzimat (Reform) Period in the Ottoman State. Kastamonu Univ., Journal of Forestry Faculty, 10 (2): 180-194.
  4. Güner, A., Aslan, S., Ekim, T., Vural, M. and Babaç, M.T. (edlr.)., 2012. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını, İstanbul.
  5. Karagöz, A. 2000. Grassland and Pasture Crops, Country Pasture / Forage Resource Profile, FAO. www.fao.org/ag/agp/agpc/doc/counprof/turkey.htm (accessed: 10 May 2016).
  6. Karagöz, A. 2003. Plant Genetic Resources Conservation in Turkey. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sustainable Use of Plant Biodiversity to Promote New Opportunities for Horticultural Production Development. Düzyaman, E. and Tüzel, Y. (eds.). Acta Horticulturae, 598: 17-25.
  7. Karagöz, A., Zencirci, N., Tan, A., Taşkın, T., Köksel, H., Sürek, M., Toker, C. and Özbek, K. 2010. Conservation and use of plant genetic resources. VIIth Technical Conference of Agricultural Engineering. Proceedings V I: 155-177 (in Turkish).
  8. Karagöz, A., Özbek, K. ve Sarı, N. 2016. Türkiye’nin bitkisel biyolojik çeşitliliğinin korunması ve sürdürülebilir kullanımına ilişkin sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25 (1): 88-99.
  9. MFWA, 2016. Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs, http://www.-milliparklar.gov.tr/korunanalanlar/korunanalan1.htm (accessed: 10 May 2016).
  10. NBSAP, 2001. The National Strategy and Action Plan for Biodiversity in Turkey. www.cbd.int/doc/world/tr/tr-nbsap-01-p1-en.pdf (acessed 10 May 2016).