Journals / TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni / 2008 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Type 2 diabetic patients' attitudes about care and treatment and factors affecting the attitudes

Tip 2 diyabetli hastaların bakım ve tedaviye yönelik tutumları ve tutumu etkileyen faktörler

Pages
223–230
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: In conclusion the male patients had more positive attitudes towards their care and treatment compared to the female patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: This research was planned as a descriptive study for the purpose of determining attitudes of Type 2 diabetic patients towards their care and treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHOD: The sample was comprised of 110 diabetic patients who came to the Turkish Diabetes Society, Denizli Office, Diabetes Center between March 1 and May 15, 2007.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: In conclusion the male patients had more positive attitudes towards their care and treatment compared to the female patients.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sağlık tutumu · Demografi · Yaş dağılımı

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This research was planned as a descriptive study for the purpose of determining attitudes of Type 2 diabetic patients towards their care and treatment. METHOD: The sample was comprised of 110 diabetic patients who came to the Turkish Diabetes Society, Denizli Office, Diabetes Center between March 1 and May 15, 2007. Data collection tools used in the study was a questionnaire to determine the illness-related descriptive characteristics and the Diabetes Attitude Scale to determine the attitudes towards care and treatment. Data were analyzed using SPSS 11.0 software. RESULTS: In this study 58.2% of the patients were female, 41.8% were male and 33.6% were primary school graduates. Their mean age was 56.44 ± 12.12 years. Compliance with treatment for 48.2% of the patients was at the average level. The patients had a low level of positive attitudes towards their care and treatment. The female patients' mean score from the tool was 3.42 ± 0.57 and the male patients' was 3.61 ± 0.29. As a result of the statistical analysis it was determined that there were statistically significant relationships between level of compliance with treatment and status of being careful with diet and their diabetes attitude (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion the male patients had more positive attitudes towards their care and treatment compared to the female patients. Statistically significant differences were found between diabetes attitude and level of compliance with treatment and status of being careful with diet.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu araştırma, Tip 2 diyabetli hastaların bakım ve tedaviye yönelik tutumlarının belirlenmesi amacıyla tanımlayıcı tipte planlanmıştır. YÖNTEM: 01 Mart- 15 Mayıs 2007 tarihlerinde Türk Diabet Cemiyeti Denizli Şubesi Diabet Merkezi’ne gelen toplam 110 diyabetli hasta araştırmanın örneklemini oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama aracı olarak hastalığa ilişkin tanıtıcı özellikleri belirleme soru formu, bakım ve tedaviye yönelik tutumlarını belirlemek amacıyla “Diyabet Tutum Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Veriler SPSS 11,0 bilgisayar paket programında değerlendirilmiştir. BULGULAR: Hastaların %58,2’sini kadınlar, %41,8’ini erkekler oluşturmuştur. Hastaların %33,6’sı ilkokul mezunudur. Yaş ortalaması 56,44±12,12’dir. Hastaların %48,2’sinin tedaviye uyumu orta düzeydedir. Hastaların bakım ve tedaviye yönelik tutumlarının düşük düzeyde pozitif tutumda olduğu saptanmıştır. Kadınların ölçekten almış oldukları puan ortalaması 3,42±0,57, erkeklerin 3,61±0,29’dur. Yapılan istatistiksel analiz sonucu cinsiyet, tedaviye uyum düzeyi ve beslenmeye dikkat etme durumu ile diyabet tutumu arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir (p<0,05). SONUÇ: Sonuç olarak, erkeklerin bakım ve tedaviye yönelik tutumları kadınlara göre daha olumludur. Tedaviye uyum düzeyi ve beslenmeye dikkat etme durumu ile diyabet tutumu arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARTAL, A., ÇAĞIRGAN, G., TIĞLI, H., GÜNGÖR, Y., KARAKUŞ, N., GELEN, M. (2008). Type 2 diabetic patients' attitudes about care and treatment and factors affecting the attitudes. TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 223–230. https://ajindex.com/articles/131702

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Booth GL, Kapral MK, Fung K, Tu JV. Recent Trends in Cardiovascular Complications Among Men and Women With and Without Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2006; 29: 32-37
  2. Watanabe M, Yamaoka K, Yokotsuka M, Tango T. Randomized Controlled Trial of a New Dietary Education Program to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes in a High –Risk Group of Japanese Male Workers. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 3209-3214
  3. Gillibranda R, Stevenson J. The Extended Helath Belief Model Applied to the Experience of Diabetes in Young People. British Journal of Health Psyshology. 2006; 11: 155-169
  4. Christensen NK, Steiner J, Whalen J, Pfister R. Contrubition of Medical Nutrition Therapy and Diabetes Self Management Education to Diabetes Control as Assessed by Hemoglobin A1c. Diabetes Spectrum. 2000; 13(2): 72-79
  5. Kara B.Tip 2 Diyabetes Mellitus Hastalarında Anksiyete ile Metabolik Kontrol Arasındaki İlişki. Sağlık ve Toplum. 2006; 16(1): 36-40
  6. Jones ED, Malone LK, Wideman L. Early Detection of Type 2 Diabetes Among Older African-American, Geriatric Nursing. 2004; 25(1):24-28
  7. King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global Burden of Diabetes 1995-2025, Diabetes Care. 1998; 21:1414-1431
  8. Leontos C, Wong F, Gallivan J, Lisng M. National Diabetes Education Program, Journal of The American Dietetic Association. 1998; 98(1): 73-75
  9. Arslan P. Diyabetin Kronik Komplikasyonlarında ve Önlenmesinde Tıbbi Beslenme Tedavisi. Türk Diyabet Yıllığı. 2002-2003. Sayı:16. İstanbul. p.89-96
  10. Wild S, Roglic G, Gren A, Scree R, King H. Global Prevalence of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(5): 1047-1053
  11. Satman İ,Yılmaz T, Sengül A, ve ark. Population –Based Study of Diabetes and Risk Characteristics in Turkey: Results of The Turkish Diabetes Epidemiology Study (TURDEP). Epidemiyology/Health Services/Pyschosocial Research. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 1551-1556
  12. Bahar A, Sertbaş G. Diyabetes Mellituslu Hastalarda Yaşam kalitesi ve Yetiyitimi. Sağlık ve Toplum. 2006; 16(4): 29-39
  13. Gergely M. Effective Diabetes Education. IDF Bulletin. 1992; (37): 9-10
  14. Basco MR. Perfectionizm and Diabetes Care. Diabetes Spectrum.1998; 11: 43-48
  15. Hannah JB, Alberts J. Motivators and Barriers to Attending a Diabetes Education Class and Its Impact on Beliefs. Behaviors, and Control Over Diabetes. Geriatric Nursing. 2005; 26(1): 50-58
  16. Daniel M, Messer LC. Perception of Disease Severity and Barriers to Self Care Predict Glysemic Control in Aboriginal Persons With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Chronic Diseases in C