SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 2

Physiological and Biochemical Insights into Drought Tolerance of Alfalfa Cultivars with Different Sensitivities

Gürkan Demirkol(Tokat Gazıosmanpasa Unıversıty Faculty of Agrıculture Department of Fıeld Crops)0000-0003-0033-8039
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-04-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the reductions in growth parameters, relative water content, and total chlorophyll content started to be observed at earlier drought stress levels in Bilensoy-80, whereas Diane maintained stability until more severe drought levels, compared with the control.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Drought is one of the most critical abiotic stresses limiting alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) productivity worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study investigated the physiological and biochemical responses of two contrasting alfalfa cultivars, ‘Bilensoy-80’ (sensitive) and ‘Diane’ (tolerant), exposed to drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000) at different water potentials (0, −0.5, −1.0, −1.5, −2.0 MPa).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the reductions in growth parameters, relative water content, and total chlorophyll content started to be observed at earlier drought stress levels in Bilensoy-80, whereas Diane maintained stability until more severe drought levels, compared with the control.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:antioxidant activity · forage · osmotic stress

Abstract

Drought is one of the most critical abiotic stresses limiting alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) productivity worldwide. This study investigated the physiological and biochemical responses of two contrasting alfalfa cultivars, ‘Bilensoy-80’ (sensitive) and ‘Diane’ (tolerant), exposed to drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000) at different water potentials (0, −0.5, −1.0, −1.5, −2.0 MPa). Growth traits, relative water content, total chlorophyll content, osmolyte accumulation, lipid peroxidation, total phenolics, and activities of major antioxidant enzymes were evaluated. The results showed that the reductions in growth parameters, relative water content, and total chlorophyll content started to be observed at earlier drought stress levels in Bilensoy-80, whereas Diane maintained stability until more severe drought levels, compared with the control. This enhanced performance was largely attributed to increased free proline biosynthesis and the activity of key antioxidative enzymes such as catalase (CAT), and glutathione reductase (GR). Overall, the findings provide valuable insights into the mechanisms of drought tolerance in alfalfa and may inform breeding programs aimed at improving forage crop performance under water-limited conditions

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirkol, G. (2026). Physiological and Biochemical Insights into Drought Tolerance of Alfalfa Cultivars with Different Sensitivities. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 13 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1785814

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Arnon, D. I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24(1), 1.
  2. Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., & Teare, I. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39(1), 205-207.
  3. Beauchamp, C., & Fridovich, I. (1971). Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry, 44(1), 276-287.
  4. Bothe, A., Westermeier, P., Wosnitza, A., Willner, E., Schum, A., Dehmer, K., & Hartmann, S. (2018). Drought tolerance in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) as assessed by two contrasting phenotyping systems. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 204(4), 375-389.
  5. Chance, B., & Maehly, A. (1955). Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods in Enzymology, 2, 764-775.
  6. Demirkol, G. (2021). PopW enhances drought stress tolerance of alfalfa via activating antioxidative enzymes, endogenous hormones, drought related genes and inhibiting senescence genes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 166, 540-548.
  7. Demirkol, G., Felek, A. F., Aşcı, Ö. Ö., & Yılmaz, N. (2023). Physiological and transcriptional status of genetically diverse perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) populations under drought stress. Plant Genetic Resources, 21(4), 331-339.
  8. Demirkol, G., & Yılmaz, N. (2023). Morphologically and genetically diverse forage pea (Pisum sativum var. arvense L.) genotypes under single and combined salt and drought stresses. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 196, 880-892.
  9. Farrant, J. M. (2000). A comparison of mechanisms of desiccation tolerance among three angiosperm resurrection plant species. Plant Ecology, 151(1), 29-39.
  10. Hasanuzzaman, M., Bhuyan, M. B., Zulfiqar, F., Raza, A., Mohsin, S. M., Mahmud, J. A., Fujita, M., & Fotopoulos, V. (2020). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants, 9(8), 681.
  11. Kang, Y., Seminario, A., Udvardi, M., & Annicchiarico, P. (2023). Physiological and biochemical adaptive traits support the specific breeding of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) for severely drought‐stressed or moisture‐favourable environments. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 209(1), 132-143.
  12. Khan, Z., Jan, R., Asif, S., Farooq, M., Jang, Y.-H., Kim, E.-G., Kim, N., & Kim, K.-M. (2024). Exogenous melatonin induces salt and drought stress tolerance in rice by promoting plant growth and defense system. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1214.
  13. Khandal, H., Parween, S., Roy, R., Meena, M. K., & Chattopadhyay, D. (2017). MicroRNA profiling provides insights into post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in chickpea root apex under salinity and water deficiency. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1-14.
  14. Lei, Y., Xu, Y., Hettenhausen, C., Lu, C., Shen, G., Zhang, C., Li, J., Song, J., Lin, H. & Wu, J. (2018). Comparative analysis of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) leaf transcriptomes reveals genotype-specific salt tolerance mechanisms. BMC Plant Biology, 18(1), 1-14.
  15. Liu, Y., Wu, Q., Ge, G., Han, G., & Jia, Y. (2018). Influence of drought stress on alfalfa yields and nutritional composition. BMC Plant Biology, 18(1), 1-9.
  16. Michel, B. E., & Kaufmann, M. R. (1973). The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant physiology, 51(5), 914-916.
  17. Mushtaq, Z., Faizan, S., & Gulzar, B. (2020). Salt stress, its impacts on plants and the strategies plants are employing against it: A review. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology, 8, 81-91.
  18. Ohkawa, H., Ohishi, N., & Yagi, K. (1979). Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Analytical Biochemistry, 95(2), 351-358.
  19. Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Ahmadi, J., Mehrabi, A. A., Etminan, A., Moghaddam, M., & Siddique, K. H. (2017). Physiological responses to drought stress in wild relatives of wheat: implications for wheat improvement. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 39(4), 106.
  20. Sadighfard, S., & Demirkol, G. (2025). Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of salinity tolerance in tall fescue: a comparative analysis of cultivars differing in salinity tolerance. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 28(4), 1043-1053.
  21. Putnam, D. H. (2021). Factors influencing yield and quality in alfalfa. In The alfalfa genome (pp. 13-27): Springer.
  22. Rehman, A., Weng, J., Li, P., Yu, J., Rahman, S. U., Khalid, M., Shah, I. H., Gulzar, S., Chang, L. & Niu, Q. (2023). Differential response of two contrasting melon (Cucumis melo L.) genotypes to drought stress. Journal of Plant Biology, 66(6), 519-534.
  23. Sgherri, C. L. M., Loggini, B., Puliga, S., & Navari-Izzo, F. (1994). Antioxidant system in Sporobolus stapfianus: changes in response to desiccation and rehydration. Phytochemistry, 35(3), 561-565.
  24. Slinkard, K., & Singleton, V. L. (1977). Total phenol analysis: automation and comparison with manual methods. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 28(1), 49-55.
  25. Ullah, A., Al-Busaidi, W. M., Al-Sadi, A. M., & Farooq, M. (2022). Bread wheat genotypes accumulating free proline and phenolics can better tolerate drought stress through sustained rate of photosynthesis. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 22(1), 165-176.
  26. Wang, S. Y., Jiao, H. J., & Faust, M. (1991). Changes in ascorbate, glutathione, and related enzyme activities during thidiazuron‐induced bud break of apple. Physiologia Plantarum, 82(2), 231-236.
  27. Zhang, C., Shi, S., Liu, Z., Yang, F., & Yin, G. (2019). Drought tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) varieties is associated with enhanced antioxidative protection and declined lipid peroxidation. Journal of Plant Physiology, 232, 226-240.
  28. Zhang, C., Shi, S., Wang, B., & Zhao, J. (2018). Physiological and biochemical changes in different drought-tolerant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) varieties under PEG-induced drought stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 40(2), 1-15.
  29. Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Hassan, M. J., Li, Z., & Peng, Y. (2020). Indole-3-acetic acid improves drought tolerance of white clover via activating auxin, abscisic acid and jasmonic acid related genes and inhibiting senescence genes. BMC Plant Biology, 20, 1-12.
  30. Zhang, Y., Luan, Q., Jiang, J., & Li, Y. (2021). Prediction and utilization of malondialdehyde in exotic pine under drought stress using near-infrared spectroscopy. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 735275.
  31. Rehman, A., Weng, J., Li, P., Yu, J., Rahman, S. U., Khalid, M., Shah, I. H., Gulzar, S., Chang, L. & Niu, Q. (2023). Differential response of two contrasting melon (Cucumis melo L.) genotypes to drought stress. Journal of Plant Biology, 66(6), 519-534.