Journals / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 3

Willingness of Hemp Farmers to Establish Producer Organizations: Evidence from Samsun, Türkiye

Ömer Atalık(ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY)0009-0003-0334-0086
Bakiye Kılıç Topuz(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TARIM EKONOMİSİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-3607-4306
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the majority of farmers (89.3%) are willing to establish agricultural organizations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Producer organizations play a significant role in agricultural value chains in terms of controlling the market, enhancing bargaining power, and ensuring economic sustainability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Industrial hemp is of strategic importance as a high-value-added fiber crop.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the majority of farmers (89.3%) are willing to establish agricultural organizations.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:agricultural organization · CART algorithm · hemp

Abstract

Producer organizations play a significant role in agricultural value chains in terms of controlling the market, enhancing bargaining power, and ensuring economic sustainability. Industrial hemp is of strategic importance as a high-value-added fiber crop. However, in Türkiye, the hemp sector is largely dominated by private companies, and there is no producer organization established and operated by producers. The purpose of this study is to determine the willingness of hemp producers in Samsun Province, Türkiye’s most important hemp-producing region, to establish a producer organization and to identify the factors influencing this willingness. The data for the study were obtained from face-to-face surveys conducted with 112 hemp producers selected using simple random sampling. The CART algorithm was used to identify the factors influencing the willingness to organize. The results show that the majority of farmers (89.3%) are willing to establish agricultural organizations. According to the results of the CART algorithm, none of the hemp producers who have had negative experiences with cooperatives in the past are willing to organize. Other important factors influencing the willingness to organize include having farming as one’s primary occupation, the area under hemp cultivation, and the age of the producers. The findings indicate that institutional trust, rather than sociodemographic characteristics, is the primary determinant of decisions to establish producer organizations. This result indicated that rebuilding social trust following cooperative failures may be a lengthy process. To enable producers in the hemp sector to have a say in the market, increase their competitive and bargaining power, and achieve a sustainable structure, action must be taken to establish an organization by capitalizing on producers’ strong willingness to organize.

🔖

Cite This Article

Atalık, Ö., Topuz, B. K. (2026). Willingness of Hemp Farmers to Establish Producer Organizations: Evidence from Samsun, Türkiye. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 13 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1913904

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Alpar, R. (2012). Applied statistics and validity-reliability with examples in health, sports and educational sciences [In Turkish]. Detay Publishing.
  2. Anonymous, (2023). Samsun Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry. Provincial agricultural records [Unpublished raw data]. Samsun, Türkiye.
  3. Atalik, O., & Kılıç Topuz, B. (2025). Hemp production and policies in the European Union and Türkiye. 8th International Congress on Agriculture, Environment and Health, Aydın, Türkiye.
  4. Ayan, M. U., & Kılıç Topuz, B. (2025). Marketing margins in the hemp supply chain in Samsun Province [Unpublished project report, The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK), Project No. 2209-A].
  5. Bertucelli, S. (2013). Agricultural and cooperative voluntarism as a driving force of innovation: The example of industrial hemp. OCL-Oilseeds and Fats, Crops and Lipids, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2013012
  6. Birchall, J. (2014). The governance of large co-operative businesses. Manchester: Co-operatives UK.
  7. Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  8. Brkljača, M., Mihić, M., Umetić, V., & Supić, A. (2022). Improving the marketing potential of rural area through the cultivation of the industrial hemp. Economics of Agriculture, 69(1), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2201223B
  9. Değer, H. C., Özder, U., Kınıklı, F., & Yercan, M. (2020). Determining cooperative tendencies of tomato farmers on marketing in Muğla. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Economics, 26(2), 121–129. [In Turkish].
  10. European Industrial Hemp Association (EIHA). (2023). About hemp definition. https://eiha.org/about-hemp-definition/ Accessed January 27, 2024.
  11. European Commission. (2024). Hemp. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/farming/crop-productions-and-plant-based-products/hemp Accessed February 6, 2024.
  12. Everest, B. (2021). Willingness of farmers to establish a renewable energy (solar and wind) cooperative in NW Turkey. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14: 517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06931-9
  13. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2025). FAOSTAT Database: Crop production. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL Accessed September 5, 2025.
  14. Giupponi, L., Leoni, V., Carrer, M., Ceciliani, G., Sala, S., Panseri, S., Pavlovic, R., & Giorgi, A. (2020). Overview on Italian hemp production chain, related productive and commercial activities and legislative framework. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 15(2), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2020.1552
  15. Hellwinckel, C. (2020). Hemp: Can cooperative-run quotas prevent overproduction? Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 9(2), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2020.092.016
  16. Johnson, R. (2014). Hemp as an agricultural commodity. Congressional Research Service Report, Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress, February 14.
  17. Karakaya, E., Çelik, Ş., & Taysi, M. R. (2018). Examining the factors affecting fish meat consumption using CHAID algorithm. Gaziosmanpaşa University Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 35(2), 85–93. [In Turkish].
  18. Kılıç Topuz, B. (2017). Trust and factors affecting performance in agricultural producer unions in Samsun Province (Doctoral dissertation, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economics). [In Turkish].
  19. Kılıç Topuz, B., Eyduran, E., Ertürk, Y. E., & Bozoğlu, M. (2022). Determination of factors affecting participation of the members in the general assembly meeting of agricultural organizations using CHAID Algorithm: Igdir province example. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 25(2), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.915325
  20. Kılıç Topuz, B. (2023). Members’ willingness to pay for sustainability agricultural organization: A Heckman model approach. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 35(11), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2023.3178
  21. La Chanvrière. (2024). Story of men. https://lachanvriere.com/en/story-of-men/ Accessed August 22, 2025. Mahmoodzadeh, J., & Sabouri, M. S. (2014). Study on factors affecting farmers' tendency to establish production cooperatives by factor analysis in Mahabad (West Azarbaijan Province, Iran). International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences, 4(2), 245–250.
  22. Mendeş, M., & Akkartal, E. (2009). Regression tree analysis for predicting slaughter weight in broilers. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8, 615–624.
  23. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MoAF). (2025). Hemp cultivation book. https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/ktae/belgeler/kenevir_tarimi_kitabi.pdf Accessed May 27, 2025.
  24. Nisbet, R., Elder, J., & Miner, G. (2009). Handbook of statistical analysis and data mining applications. Academic Press.
  25. Nordic Hemp. (2024). Our story. https://nordichemp.ee/our-story/ Accessed May 22, 2025.
  26. Official Gazette. (2024). Twelfth Development Plan (2024–2028). Presidency of Strategy and Budget. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/On-Ikinci-Kalkinma-Plani_2024-2028_11122023.pdf Accessed September 16, 2025.
  27. Pehlivan, G. (2006). CHAID analysis and an application (Master’s thesis, Yıldız Technical University, Graduate School of Science and Engineering). [In Turkish].
  28. Tutek, K., & Masek, A. (2022). Hemp and its derivatives as a universal industrial raw material (with particular emphasis on the polymer industry): A review. Materials, 15(7), 2565.
  29. Turkish Co-operatives Central Union (Türk-Koop). (2019). Sectoral analysis report on co-operatives in Türkiye. [In Turkish].
  30. Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKStat). (2024). Plant production statistics. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=79&locale=tr Accessed September 5, 2025.
  31. Yamane, T. (2010). Basic sampling methods (A. Esin, C. Aydın, M. A. Bakır, & E. Gürbüzsel, Trans.). Literatür Publishing. [In Turkish].