Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Essay on economic efficiency: X-efficiency approach

İktisadi etkinlik üzerine bir deneme: X etkinlik yaklaşımı

Pages
183–198
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Departing X (in) efficiency approach, the aim of this essay is to study the sources of efficiency existing in the real economic life and to model its determinants within today’s market relations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Economics has used Neoclassical-Pareto Efficiency Theory as economic efficiency for a long time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, this theory is not sufficient to explain the (in) efficiencies of the real economic activity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Departing X (in) efficiency approach, the aim of this essay is to study the sources of efficiency existing in the real economic life and to model its determinants within today’s market relations.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Economics has used Neoclassical-Pareto Efficiency Theory as economic efficiency for a long time. However, this theory is not sufficient to explain the (in) efficiencies of the real economic activity. Although some approaches have introduced against the conventional theory, a more general and comprehensive explanation on efficiency is that engaged by modern economic theory has not yet been in force. The dimensions of ongoing controversy has reached from X (in) efficiency approach to the modern theories of the firm. Departing X (in) efficiency approach, the aim of this essay is to study the sources of efficiency existing in the real economic life and to model its determinants within today’s market relations.

Özet

İktisat, uzun yıllar boyunca iktisadi etkinlik olarak Neoklasik-Pareto etkinlik teorisini kullanmıştır. İktisadi hayatın etkinliğini-etkisizliğini açıklamaya yeterli olmayan bu görüşe karşı bazı yaklaşımlar getirilmesine karşın, halihazırda modern iktisat teorisinin kullanmış olduğu genel ve kapsayıcı bir iktisadi etkinlik tanımlaması yapılamamıştır. İktisadi etkinlik üzerine devam eden tartışmanın boyutları, X etkinlik yaklaşımından, modern firma teorilerine kadar uzanmaktadır. Bu deneme, X etkinlik teorisinden yola çıkarak, gerçek iktisadi hayatta var olan etkinsizlik kaynaklarını irdelemeyi ve iktisadi etkinliğin, günümüz piyasa ilişkilerindeki belirleyicilerini modellemeyi hedeflemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, T. (2010). Essay on economic efficiency: X-efficiency approach. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 183–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/131666

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. ALCHIAN, A., DEMSETZ, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The Amreican Economic Review. 62 (5), 777-795. ss. BARON, D. (1989). Design of regulatory mechanisms and institutions. R. SCHMALENSEE, R. WILLIG (ed.), Handbook of industrial organization Amsterdam: North Holland. BERGSMAN, J. (1974). Commercial policy, allocative efficiency, and x efficiency. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88 (3), 409-433. ss. BORENSTEIN, S., FARRELL, J. (2000). Is cost-cutting evidence of x-inefficiency. The American Economic Review, 90 (2), 224-227. ss. BROUSSEAU, E., GLACHANT, M. (2002). The Economics of contracts and the renewal of economics. E. BROUSSEAU, M. GLACHANT (ed.), The economics of contracts: theories and applications İçinde. London: Cambridge University Press.
  2. CARLTON, D., PERLOFF, J. (1994). Modern industrial organization. 2. bs., New York: Harper Collins. CHEUNG, S. (1983). The contractual nature of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (1), 1-21. ss. COASE, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4 (N.S.), 386-405. ss. COASE, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (1), 1-44. ss. CONLISK, J. (1996). Bounded rationality and market fluctations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 29 (2), 233-250. ss. COOTER, R., ULEN, T. (2004). Law and economics. 4. bs., Addison Wesley Longman. COWEN, T., PARKER, D. (1997). Markets in the firm: A market-process approach to management, London: The Institute of Economic Affairs. DE ALESSI, L. (1983). Property rights, transaction costs, and x-efficiency: An essay in economic theory. The Ameracan Economic Review, 73 (1), 64-81. ss. DEMSETZ, H. (1983). The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (2), 375-390. ss. ELLINGSEN, T. (1997). Efficiency wages and x inefficiencies. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99 (4), 581-596. ss. FRANTZ, R., TOMER, J., LEIBENSTEIN, H. (1982). Worker motivation and x-efficiency theory: A comment. Journal of Economic Issues, 16 (3), 864-873. ss. FURUBOTN, E. (1991). General equilibrium models, transaction costs, and the concept of efficient allocation in a capitalist economy. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 147 (3), 662-686. ss. HART, O. (1988). Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4 (1), 119-139. ss. HART, O. (1990). Is bounded rationality an important element of a theory of institutions?. Journal