SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yeni Üroloji Dergisi / 2013 / Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Impact of body mass index on success rates of ureteroscopic pneumolithotripsy

Vücut kitle endeksinin üreteroskopik pnömolitotripsi sonuçlarına etkisi

Gökhan Atış(İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi Göztepe Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği)
Özgür Arıkan(İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi Göztepe Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği)
Eyüp Sabri Pelit(İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi Göztepe Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği)
Cengiz Çanakçı(İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi Göztepe Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği)
İsmail Ulus(İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi Göztepe Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği)
Turhan Çaşkurlu(İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi Göztepe Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2013-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients were divided into four groups depending on their BMIs: ideal body weight

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine whether the body mass index BMI affects the outcome and morbidity of ureteroscopic pneumolitotripsy.Materials and Methods: From January 2006 to April 2010, 332 patients with ureteral stones ranging 8 mm to 15 mm, who underwent semirigid ureteroscopy URS with pneumolithotripsy, were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: To determine whether the body mass index BMI affects the outcome and morbidity of ureteroscopic pneumolitotripsy.Materials and Methods: From January 2006 to April 2010, 332 patients with ureteral stones ranging 8 mm to 15 mm, who underwent semirigid ureteroscopy URS with pneumolithotripsy, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients were divided into four groups depending on their BMIs: ideal body weight
🔬Design:Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Body mass index · ureteral stone · ureteroscopy

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the body mass index BMI affects the outcome and morbidity of ureteroscopic pneumolitotripsy.Materials and Methods: From January 2006 to April 2010, 332 patients with ureteral stones ranging 8 mm to 15 mm, who underwent semirigid ureteroscopy URS with pneumolithotripsy, were included in the study. Patients were divided into four groups depending on their BMIs: ideal body weight

Özet

Amaç: Vücut kitle indeksinin üreteroskopik pnömolitotripsi sonuç ve morbiditesini etkileyip etkilemediğini belirlemek. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ocak 2006-Nisan 2010 tarihleri arasında, 8 mm ile 15 mm boyutları arasındaki üreter taşı sebebiyle semirigid üreteroskopi URS eşliğinde pnömolitotripsi uygulanan 332 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi.Hastalar vücut kitle endeksine BMI göre 4 gruba ayrıldı; Grup 1 normal , BMI 35 kg/m2. Hastalar preoperatif ve postoperatif düz karın grafisi, renal ultrasonografi, intravenöz piyelografi ve/veya kontrastsız spiral bilgisayarlı tomografi BT ile takip edildi. Tedavi edilen hastalarda 0.05 . Gruplar arasında taşsızlık oranları, komplikasyon oranları, operasyon süreleri ve hastanede kalış süreleri açısından farklılık izlenmedi.Sonuç: Çalışmamızda vücut-kitle endeksinin, üreteroskopi etkinliğine ve komplikasyon oranlarına etkisi gözlenmemiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

Atış, G., Arıkan, Ö., Pelit, E. S., Çanakçı, C., Ulus, İ., Çaşkurlu, T. (2013). Impact of body mass index on success rates of ureteroscopic pneumolithotripsy. Yeni Üroloji Dergisi, Volume: 8 Issue: 3. https://ajindex.com/articles/1315518

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, et al. Body mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1097-1105.
  2. Andreoni C, Afane J, Olweny E, et al. Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: First line therapy for proximal ureteral and re- nal calculi in the morbidly obese and superobese patient. J Endourol 2001;15:493-8.
  3. Pearle MS, Nakada SY, Womack JS, et al. Outcomes of con- temporary percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in morbidly obese patients. J Urol 1998;160:669-73.
  4. Goldfarb DS. Increasing prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Kidney Int 2003;63:1951-2.
  5. Curhan GC. Epidemiology of stone disease. Urol Clin North Am 2007;34:287-93.
  6. Bagrodia A, Gupta A, Raman JD, et al. Impact of body mass index on cost and clinical outcomes after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urology 2008; 72:756-60.
  7. Delakas D, Karyotis I, Daskalopoulos G, et al. Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter. J Endo- urol 2003;17:201-5.
  8. Muñoz RD, Tirolien PP, Belhamou S, et al. Treatment of reno-ureteral lithiasis with ESWL in obese patients. Apro- pos of 150 patients. Arch Esp Urol 2003; 56: 933-8.
  9. El-Nahas AR, El-Tabey NA, Eraky I, et al. Semirigid urete- roscopy for ureteral stones: a multivariate analysis of unfa- vorable results. J Urol 2009; 181: 1158-62.
  10. Aslan Y, Kırılmaz U, Tuncel A, et al. Üreter taşı olan hasta- larda rigit üreteroskopi ve pnömotik litotripsi sonuçlarımız. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2010;36:263-9.
  11. Stevens J, Cai J, Pamuk ER, et al. The effect of age on the as- sociation between body-mass index and mortality. N Engl J Med 1998;338: 1-7.
  12. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al. Guideline on urolithiasis, 2010: 1-106. Available at: http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/ Urolithiasis%202010.pdf
  13. Tomaszewski JJ, Smaldone MC, Schuster T, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy stratified by body mass index. J Endourol 2010:24:547-50.
  14. Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA 2005:293:455-62.
  15. Duffey BG, Pedro RN, Kriedberg C, et al. Lithoge- nic risk factors in the morbidly obese population. J Urol 2008;179:1401-6.
  16. Calvert RC, Burgess NA. Urolithiasis and obesity: metabolic and technical considerations. Curr Opin Urol 2005;15:113-7.
  17. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percu- taneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:899-906.
  18. Juan YS, Shen JT, Li CC, et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the mana- gement of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones. Kaoh- siung J Med Sci 2008;24:204-9.
  19. Natalin R, Xavier K, Okeke Z, et al. Impact of obesity on ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy of urinary tract calculi. Int Braz J Urol 2009;35:36-42.
  20. Faerber GJ, Goh M. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the morbidly obese patient. Tech Urol 1997;3:89-95.
  21. Tefekli A, Kurtoglu H, Tepeler K, et al. Does the metabolic syndrome or its components affect the outcome of percuta- neous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 2008;22:35-40.
  22. Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ, et al. Complica- tions of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors. J Urol 2001:166:538-40.
  23. Johnson DB, Pearle MS. Complications of ureteroscopy. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:157-71.
  24. Best SL, Nakada SY. Flexible ureteroscopy is effective for proximal ureteral stones in both obese and nonobese pa- tients: a two-year, single-surgeon experience. Urology 2011;77:36-9.