Journals / IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal / 2012 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 7

OSMANLI’DAN CUMHURİYET’E TÜRKİYE’DE YABANCI DİL POLİTİKASI UYGULAMALARI

FOREIGN LANGUAGE POLICY PRACTICES IN TURKEY: FROM OTTOMAN TO REPUBLIC

Pages
53–68
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, the aim of this study is to look at the development of foreign language studies in our history and have a look at the issue in order to understand the reasons of the everchanging policy of FLT in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Throughout history foreing language learning and teaching has always been one of the main issues on every part of the world as well as it is in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Different variables became an influential issue on the choice of the foreign language to be learned.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, the aim of this study is to look at the development of foreign language studies in our history and have a look at the issue in order to understand the reasons of the everchanging policy of FLT in Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Throughout history foreing language learning and teaching has always been one of the main issues on every part of the world as well as it is in Turkey. Different variables became an influential issue on the choice of the foreign language to be learned. The choice of the language to be learned changed in accordance with the political, economical or the religious reasons. At different times in history, one or more of these reasons shaped the country’s language policy. Today, foreign language education is a prominent issue on the country’s educational agenda as it was in the period of the Ottoman Empire. Especially in recent years, speaking a second language has become an essential tool to keep up with new the developments and for international communication. As foreign language learning has been a long expressed concern and lack of foreign language competence among people is still an issue to be studied, there appeared the need for an analysis on the foreign language policies throughout the years. Therefore, the aim of this study is to look at the development of foreign language studies in our history and have a look at the issue in order to understand the reasons of the everchanging policy of FLT in Turkey.

Özet

Dil öğrenimi ve öğretimi dünyanın diğer bölgelerinde olduğu gibi ülkemizde de tarih boyunca ele alınan temel konulardan biri olmuştur. Ülkeler hangi yabancı dilin öğretileceğini farklı değişkenlerle belirlemişlerdir. Yabancı dil eğitimi, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu döneminde olduğu gibi bugün de ülkenin eğitim gündeminde yer alan önemli bir konudur. Yerel, bölgesel ve uluslararası ilişkiler yabancı dil öğrenme ve öğretmeyi belirleyen önemli seçim nedenlerinden bazılarıdır. Dil planlama politikaları belirtilen nedenler doğrultusunda çeşitli zamanlarda pek çok kereler değişmiştir. Özellikle son yıllarda, ikinci dil öğrenimi uluslararası iletişimi sağlamak ve dünyadaki yeni gelişmeleri takip edebilmek için vazgeçilmez bir araç halini almıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de değişen yabancı dil eğitim politikasının nedenlerini ve tarihimizdeki yabancı dil geliştirme çalışmalarını değerlendirmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜKOĞLU, H. (2012). OSMANLI’DAN CUMHURİYET’E TÜRKİYE’DE YABANCI DİL POLİTİKASI UYGULAMALARI. IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 7, 53–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/131519

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. ABAY, A. R., (2003). “Eğitim Politikası”, 1980-2003 Türkiye’nin Dış Ekonomik Sosyal ve İdari Politikaları, (ed.) Göksu,T., Çevik, H.H., Baharçiçek, A. A.ve Şen, A., Ankara Siyasal Kitabevi.
  2. AKYÜZ, Y., (1996). “Eğitim Tarihimizden Bugün için Çıkarılması Gereken bazı dersler ve Düşünceler” Eğitimimize Bakışlar. Kültür Koleji Eğitim Vakfı Yayınları 1, İstanbul, 1996.
  3. ALPTEKİN, C., (2010). “A Cognitive and Neorobiological Account of Becoming Bilingual’’ GELTUS. BELCHER, D.D., (2006). English for Specific Purposes: Teaching to Perceived Needs and Imagined Futures in Worlds of Work, Study, and Everyday life, TESOL Quarterly, 40 (1), 133-156.
  4. BLACKBURN, R.T., AND LAWRENCE, J. H., (1995). Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  5. BLOOMFIELD, L., (1933). Language. London: Allen and Unwin. BOWEN, H. R., (1980). Investment in learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
  6. BÜYÜKKANTARCIOĞLU, N., ( 2004 ). A sociolinguistic analysis of the present dimentions of English as a foreign language in Turkey, International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 165. Walter de Gruyter. pp.33‐58. BROWN, J. D., (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum. Boston, Massachusetts: Newbury House. CANAGARAJAH, A.S., (2006). TESOL At Forty: What are the Issues? TESOL Quarterly, 40 (1), 9- 34. CORSON, D., (1996). Language Policy Across the Curriculum Multilingual Matters Ltd., Clevedon: Philadelphia. DEMİRCAN, Ö., (1988). Dünden Bugüne Türkiye’de Yabancı Dil, İstanbul:
  7. Remzi Kitabevi.
  8. DEMİREZEN, M., (2007). “Identity Problems of Non-native Teachers of English in Teacher Education,” The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XIII, No. 8, August 2007d, http://itesl, org/ DIJITE, P., (1994). From Language Policy to Language Planning. Harper Perennial. DUBIN, F., & OLSHTAIN, E., (1991). Course Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. ELLIS, R., (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. ELLIS, R., (1997). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. EURYDICE, (2005). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice European Unit. FASOLD, R., (1991). The sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford: Basic Blackwell GÜNEŞ, B., (2009). 1945-1980 Arası Türkiye’de İngilizce Eğitimi.(Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dalı, Isparta. GRAVES, K., (1996). Teachers as Course Developers. Cambridge: Cambridge Un