Journals / Liberal Düşünce Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 95

Scale Economy in Local Government: Theory, Concept and Debates

Yerel Yönetimlerde Ölçek Ekonomisi: Teori, Kavram ve Tartışmalar

Pages
163–192
Publication Date
2019-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These evidences show that the expectation of cost savings originating from the scale economy doesn’t correspond in all cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The scale economy thesis is one of the leading motives of the reforms that seek more economic local public services on the basis of the local government size.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In case of the existence of scale economies, average costs of the output can be reduced by means of increasing the inputs in a concrete local service’s production as long as optimal size of service area isn’t exceeded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These evidences show that the expectation of cost savings originating from the scale economy doesn’t correspond in all cases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ölçek ekonomisi · kapsam ekonomisi · optimum büyüklük

Abstract

The scale economy thesis is one of the leading motives of the reforms that seek more economic local public services on the basis of the local government size. In case of the existence of scale economies, average costs of the output can be reduced by means of increasing the inputs in a concrete local service’s production as long as optimal size of service area isn’t exceeded. However, the usage of the scale economy thesis in the literature of local government isn’t grounded over this scenario. It is built through the expectation of saving on the costs by means of increasing local authority’s size as a geographical area or population. In other words, the scale economy which is a thesis substantially belonging to the theory of the firm is used in a decontextualized way in the area of local governments. With snatching the output from production and defining it via population, gains which arise from the size of local authority or service capacity are also called as scale gains. The first aim is being able to frame the concepts correctly. Secondly, it is emphasized that scale gains cannot be a valid approach for the whole range of local service and local government sizes. Providing findings of many field research, empirical evidences of the relationship between size and efficiency are also presented. These evidences show that the expectation of cost savings originating from the scale economy doesn’t correspond in all cases.

Özet

Ölçek ekonomisi tezi, yerel kamu hizmetlerini daha ekonomik sunabilmeyi, yerel yönetim büyüklüğünde arayan reformların temel gerekçelerinden biridir. Ölçek ekonomilerinin varlığı halinde, somut bir yerel hizmetin üretimindeki girdileri arttırmak suretiyle, çıktının marjinal maliyetleri düşürülebilir. Ancak, ölçek ekonomisi tezinin yerel yönetim literatüründeki kullanımı, bu senaryo üzerinden temellendirilmez. Yerel otoritenin büyüklüğünün, coğrafi alan ya da nüfus olarak arttırılması suretiyle, maliyetlerde tasarruf sağlama beklentisi üzerinden kurgulanır. Başka bir deyişle, esasen firma teorisine ait bir tez olan ölçek ekonomisi, yerel yönetimler alanında bağlamından koparılmak suretiyle kullanılır. Çıktının üretimden koparılıp, nüfus üzerinden tanımlanması yanında, yerel otoritenin boyutundan ya da hizmet sunma kapasitesinden kaynaklanan kazançlar da ölçek kazançları olarak adlandırılır. Bu çalışmanın ilk amacı kavramları doğru bir çerçeveye oturtabilmektir. İkinci olarak ölçek kazançlarının tüm yerel hizmet yelpazesi ve tüm yerel yönetim büyüklükleri için geçerli bir yaklaşım olamayacağı vurgulanmıştır. Ayrıca, yerel yönetimlerde ölçek ekonomisi tezine yönelik pek çok alan araştırmasının bulgularına çalışma içinde yer verilerek, büyüklük ve verimlilik ilişkisinin deneysel kanıtları ortaya konmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu kanıtlar, ölçek ekonomisi kaynaklı maliyet tasarrufları beklentisinin her durumda karşılığı olmadığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YASLIKAYA, R. (2019). Scale Economy in Local Government: Theory, Concept and Debates. Liberal Düşünce Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 95, 163–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/131465

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Allan AM, P. (2003). Why Smaller Councils Make Sense. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(3), 74-81.
  2. Allers, M. A., & Geertsema, J. (2016). The Effects of Local Government Amalgation on Public Spending, Taxation and Service Levels. Evidence From 15 Years of Municipal Consolidation. Journal of Regional Science, 56(4), 659-682.
  3. Baldersheim, H., & Rose, L. E. (2010). Territorial Choice: Rescaling Governance in European States. H. Baldersheim, & L. E. Rose içinde, Territorial Choice. The Politics of Boundaries and Borders (s. 1-20). London: Palgrave MacMillan. Bel, G. (2012). Local Government Size and Efficiency in Capital Intensive Services: What Evidence is There of Economies of Scale, Density and Scope? Atlanta Georgia: George State University: International Center for Public Policy. Bel, G., & Costas, A. (2006). Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty? Local Privatization in Spain. The Journal of Policy Reform, 9(1), 1-24.
  4. Bikker, J., & Van Der Linde, D. (2016). Scale economies in local public administration. Local Government Studies, 42(3), 441-463.
  5. Bish, R. L. (2001). ‘Local government amalgamations: Discredited nineteen-century ideas alive in the twenty-first. C.D. Howe Institute Commentary (The Urban Papers), 150. Blesse, S., & Baskaran, T. (2016). Do municipal mergers reduce costs? Evidence from a German federal state. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 59, 54-74.
  6. Blom-Hansen, J., Houlberg, K., & Serritzlew, S. (2014).
  7. Size, Democracy and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 790-803.
  8. Blom-Hansen, J., Houlberg, K., Serritzlew, S., & Treisman, D. (2016). Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation. American Political Science Review, 110(4), 812-831.
  9. Bodkin, R. G., & Conklin, D. W. (1971). Scale and Other Determinants of Municipal Government Expenditures in Ontario: A Quantitative Analysis. International Economic Review, 12(3), 465-481.
  10. Bovaird, T. (2014). Efficiency in Third Sector Partnerships for Delivering Local Government Services: The role of economies of scale, scope and learning. Public Management Review, 16(8), 1067-1090.
  11. Boyne, G. (1995). Population Size and Economies of Scale in Local Government. Policy and Politics, 23(3), 213-222.
  12. Byrnes, J., & Dollery, B. (2002). Do Economies of Scale Exist in Australian Local Government? A Review of the Research Evidence 1. Urban Policy and Research, 20(4), 391-414. Callanan,