SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2

Analysis of Dynamic Behaviour of Marine Pipelines with Finite Elements Method

Deniz Boru Hattı Dinamik Davranışının Sonlu Elemanlar Yöntemi İle Analizi

Begüm Yurdanur Dağlı(Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi)0000-0002-2021-5450
Dilay Uncu(Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi)0000-0001-8660-2114
Yeşim Tuskan(Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi)0000-0001-7090-2235
Pages
404–410
Publication Date
2019-08-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The concordance of the results of the two analysis methods indicates that the Finite Element Method can be used to perform an equivalent dynamic analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the dynamic behaviour of the marine pipeline subjected to hydrodynamic forces are investigated by using the Finite Element Method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Wave parameters are calculated using Stokes 3 rd Order Wave Theory.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The concordance of the results of the two analysis methods indicates that the Finite Element Method can be used to perform an equivalent dynamic analysis.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hidrodinamik kuvvet · Sonlu elemanlar yöntemi · Stokes 3. mertebe dalga teorisi

Abstract

In this study, the dynamic behaviour of the marine pipeline subjected to hydrodynamic forces are investigated by using the Finite Element Method. Wave parameters are calculated using Stokes 3 rd Order Wave Theory. The drag, inertia, and lifting forces that changed during the wave period are determined by the Morrison Equation. The new loading is performed on the system which is deformed due to the previous force considering Time History approach. The critical values of section displacements are calculated by using the Finite Element Method. The maximum displacements are compared with those determined by ANSYS-FSI (Fluid Structure Interaction) technique which combines structural analysis with flow analysis. The concordance of the results of the two analysis methods indicates that the Finite Element Method can be used to perform an equivalent dynamic analysis.

Özet

Bu çalışmada hidrodinamik kuvvetlere maruz kalan deniz boru hattının dinamik davranışı Sonlu Elemanlar Yöntemi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Dalga parametreleri Stokes 3. Mertebe Dalga Teorisi kullanılarak hesaplanmıştır. Dalga periyodu boyunca değişen sürükleme, atalet ve kaldırma kuvvetleri Morison Denklemi ile belirlenmiştir. Zaman Tanım Alanında Analiz yaklaşımı dikkate alınarak bir önceki kuvvet nedeni ile deforme olan sistem üzerine yeni yükleme yapılmıştır. Sonlu Elemanlar Yöntemi ile periyot süresince kritik kesit deplasman değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Elde dilen maksimum deplasmanlar, akış analizini yapısal analiz ile birleştiren ANSYS-FSI ( Fluid Structure Interaction ) tekniği ile belirlenen değerler ile karşılaştırılmıştır. İki analize ilişkin sonuçların tutarlı olması Sonlu Elemanlar Yönteminin eş değer dinamik analiz yapmak için kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dağlı, B. Y., Uncu, D., Tuskan, Y. (2019). Analysis of Dynamic Behaviour of Marine Pipelines with Finite Elements Method. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 404–410. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.494460

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Sarpkaya, T., Rajabi, F. 1980. Hydrodynamic drag on bottom-mounted smooth and rough cylinders in periodic flow. In Offshore Technology Conference. Offshore Technology Conference.
  2. Lundgren, H., Mathiesen, B., Gravesen, H. 1976. Wave loads on pipelines on the seafloor. In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Behaviour of Offshore Struct.(BOSS 76) (Vol. 1, pp. 236-247).
  3. Sumer, B. M., Jensen, B. L., Fredsøe, J. 1991. Effect of a plane boundary on oscillatory flow around a circular cylinder. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 225, 271-300.
  4. Ballet, J. P., Hobbs, R. E. 1992. Asymmetric effects of prop imperfections on the upheaval buckling of pipelines. Thin-Walled Structures, 13(5), 355-373.
  5. Xiaoyun, G., Fuping, G., Qun, P. 2001. Wave-soil-pipe coupling effect on submarine pipeline on-bottom stability. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 17(1), 86-96.
  6. Ong, M. C., Utnes, T., Holmedal, L. E., Myrhaug, D., Pettersen, B. 2010. Numerical simulation of flow around a circular cylinder close to a flat seabed at high Reynolds numbers using ak–ε model. Coastal Engineering,57(10), 931-947.
  7. Draper, S., An, H., Cheng, L., White, D. J., Griffiths, T. 2015. Stability of subsea pipelines during large storms. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 373(2033), 20140106.
  8. Gökkuş, Ü. 1995. Computer-Aided Design of Submarine Pipelines, Water Science Technology, 233-241.
  9. Varol, B. Y., Gökkuş, Ü. 2012 Düzenli Dalga Etkisinde ve Asılı Konumda Bulunan Deniz Boru Hattının Tesir Çizgisi Yöntemi Ile Analizi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 31-42.
  10. Cokgör, S. Avcı, I. 2001. Hydrodynamic Forces on Partly Buried Tandem Twin Pipelines in Current, Ocean Engineering, 28:1349-1360.
  11. Lee, M. M. K. 1999. Strength, stress and fracture analyses of offshore tubular joints using finite elements. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 265–286.
  12. CERC, 2002. Coastal Engineering Manual, Wave Mechanics, PartII, USA, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
  13. Ergin, A. 2010. Coastal Engineering, Metu Press, Ankara, Turkey.
  14. Sorensen R. M. 2005, Basic Coastal Engineering, vol. 10, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany.
  15. Le Mehaute, B. 1976. Similitude in coastal engineering. Journal of the waterways, harbors and coastal engineering division, 102(3), 317-335.
  16. Goda, Y. 2010. Random seas and design of maritime structures (Vol. 33). World Scientific Publishing Company.
  17. Keulegan, G. H., Carpenter, L. H. 1956. Forces on cylinders and plates in an oscillating fluid: US Department of Commerce. National Bureau of Standards.
  18. Yalçın, Y. Çevik, E. 2009. Kıyı Mühendisliği, Beta Basım A.Ş., İstanbul.
  19. Wang E. Nelson T., 2002. Structural dynamic capabilities of ANSYS,” in Proceedings of the ANSYS 2002 Conference, Pittsburg, PA, USA.
  20. Benra, F. K., Dohmen, H. J., Pei, J., Schuster, S., Wan, B. 2011. A comparison of one-way and two-way coupling methods for numerical analysis of fluid-structure interactions. Journal of applied mathematics.