SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

The 100 Most-Cited Randomized Controlled Trials in Pediatric Dentistry: An Original Bibliometric Study

Selçuk Savaş(IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2705-2401
Ebru Küçükyılmaz İzgi(IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6086-7410
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-04-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Bibliometric analyses, pediatric dentistry, randomized controlled trials

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The objective of this study is to identify and assess the 100 most-cited randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pediatric dentistry using bibliometric techniques, and to elucidate significant research trends, collaboration levels, and knowledge deficiencies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: On August 28, 2025, a comprehensive analysis was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection database using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Bibliometric analyses, pediatric dentistry, randomized controlled trials
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:bibliometric analyses · randomized contolled trials · pediatric dentistry

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to identify and assess the 100 most-cited randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pediatric dentistry using bibliometric techniques, and to elucidate significant research trends, collaboration levels, and knowledge deficiencies. Methods: On August 28, 2025, a comprehensive analysis was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection database using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. As a result, the 100 most-cited RCTs were examined in detail in terms of bibliometric variables (year, journal, author, country, institution, keywords) and citation indicators. Co-authorship and keyword analyses were performed using VOSviewer, and statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS. Results: The 100 RCTs published between 1975 and 2025 received a total of 6,719 citations, with an H-index of 47. The most frequently studied and highly cited research topics included minimally invasive methods, caries prevention strategies, comparisons of results of restorative treatments, and pulp therapies. The most cited articles were published in the Journal of Dentistry, Journal of Dental Research, and International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. Authorship analysis showed that the majority of the most-cited studies were multi-authored, with strong co-authorship networks emerging around leading research groups in Hong Kong, Brazil, and Europe. Brazil, the United Kingdom, and Hong Kong/China were the top countries that contributed, and they also stood out in international cooperation. Conclusions: The most cited randomized controlled trials mostly concentrated on caries prevention, minimally invasive techniques, restorative methods, and pulp therapies. To increase the evidence base, it is important to expand collaborations across multiple centers and look into areas that haven't been studied enough. Keywords: Bibliometric analyses, pediatric dentistry, randomized controlled trials

🔖

Cite This Article

Savaş, S., İzgi, E. K. (2026). The 100 Most-Cited Randomized Controlled Trials in Pediatric Dentistry: An Original Bibliometric Study. Selcuk Dental Journal, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1779121

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Overview. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2024;7:9.
  2. Zou J, Meng M, Law CS, Rao Y, Zhou X. Common dental diseases in children and malocclusion. Int J Oral Sci. 2018;10(1):7.
  3. Slayton RL, Palmer EA. Pediatric dentistry complications and challenges. In: Avoiding and Treating Dental Complications: Best Practices in Dentistry. Wiley; 2016. p.176–201.
  4. Jayaraman J, Dhar V, Donly KJ, et al. Reporting standards for research in pediatric dentistry (RAPID): an expert consensus-based statement. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):369.
  5. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6):775-783.
  6. Mathew MG, Samuel SR, Soni AJ, Roopa KB. Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(9):3275-3280.
  7. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings from the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6):763-772.
  8. Yee R, Holmgren C, Mulder J, Lama D, Walker D, van Palenstein Helderman W. Efficacy of silver diamine fluoride for arresting caries treatment. J Dent Res. 2009;88(7):644-647.
  9. Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L. Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double-blinded randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018;19(4):273-278.
  10. Zhi QH, Lo ECM, Lin HC. Randomized clinical trial on effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride and glass ionomer in arresting dentine caries in preschool children. J Dent. 2012;40(11):962-967.
  11. Lam XY, Ren J, Yeung AWK, Lin Y. The 100 most-cited randomised controlled trials in orthodontics: a bibliometric study. Int Dent J. 2024;74(4):868-875.
  12. Tarazona-Álvarez B, López-Roldán A, Vidal-Infer A, Alonso-Arroyo A. Bibliometric study of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses in dentistry. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(11):e929-e937.
  13. Selvaraj M, Nivethitha B, Varshitha P, Sangeetha U, Madhan B. A bibliometric analysis of the 100 top-cited systematic review and meta-analysis in orthodontics. Dental Press J Orthod. 2024;29(2):e242401.
  14. Gogos C, Kodonas K, Fardi A, Economides N. Top 100 cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses in dentistry. Acta Odontol Scand. 2020;78(2):87-97.
  15. Ahmad P, Dummer PMH, Chaudhry A, Rashid U, Saif S, Asif JA. A bibliometric study of the top 100 most-cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in endodontic journals. Int Endod J. 2019;52(9):1297-1316.
  16. Andersen J, Belmont J, Cho CT. Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2006;39(6):436-443.
  17. Feijoo JF, Limeres J, Fernández-Varela M, Ramos I, Diz P. The 100 most cited articles in dentistry. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(3):699-706.
  18. Metkar S, Thakur B, Wahjuningrum DA, et al. Conventional vs 3D printed band and loop space maintainers: a fracture strength analysis. 3D Print Med. 2025;11(1):14.
  19. Vishwanathaiah S, Fageeh HN, Khanagar SB, Maganur PC. Artificial intelligence: its uses and application in pediatric dentistry—a review. Biomedicines. 2023;11(3):788. doi:10.3390/biomedicines11030788
  20. Ghabchi B, Mavi F, Çömlekoğlu E, Saklakoğlu IE, Uzel I. Wear behavior of CAD-CAM zirconia, ceramic, and 3D printed nano-hybrid resin crowns for the restoration of primary and permanent molars: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(1):177.e1-177.e8.
  21. Fung MHT, Duangthip D, Wong MCM, Lo ECM, Chu CH. Randomized clinical trial of 12% and 38% silver diamine fluoride treatment. J Dent Res. 2018;97(2):171-178.
  22. Schwendicke F, Krois J, Robertson M, Splieth C, Santamaria R, Innes N. Cost-effectiveness of the Hall technique in a randomized trial. J Dent Res. 2019;98(1):61-67.
  23. Araujo MP, Innes NP, Bonifácio CC, et al. Atraumatic restorative treatment compared to the Hall technique for occluso-proximal carious lesions in primary molars: 36-month follow-up of a randomised control trial in a school setting. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):318.
  24. Milgrom P, Horst JA, Ludwig S, et al. Topical silver diamine fluoride for dental caries arrest in preschool children: a randomized controlled trial and microbiological analysis of caries associated microbes and resistance gene expression. J Dent. 2018;68:72-78. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.015
  25. Holan G, Eidelman E, Fuks AB. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27(2):129-136.
  26. Huth KC, Paschos E, Hajek-Al-Khatar N, et al. Effectiveness of four pulpotomy techniques: randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res. 2005;84(12):1144-1148. doi:10.1177/154405910508401210
  27. Orhan AI, Oz FT, Orhan K. Pulp exposure occurrence and outcomes after one- or two-visit indirect pulp therapy vs complete caries removal in primary and permanent molars. Pediatr Dent. 2010;32(4):347-355.
  28. Hesse D, Bonifácio CC, Mendes FM, Braga MM, Imparato JC, Raggio DP. Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:58.
  29. Alkhouli MM, Al Nesser SF, Bshara NG, AlMidani AN, Comisi JC. Comparing the efficacies of two chemo-mechanical caries removal agents (2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel and Brix 3000), in caries removal and patient cooperation: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent. 2020;93:103280.
  30. Shapira J, Kupietzky A, Kadari A, Fuks AB, Holan G. Comparison of oral midazolam with and without hydroxyzine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26(6):492-496.