Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

What’s In A Name: The Amateur‘S View Of Good Practices In Naming An Online Educational Program

Assistant Provost for Evaluation Services La Salle University

Pages
225–240
Publication Date
2013-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that contrary to the concerns expressed by some practitioners in the naming industry, college-educated individuals who do not create names for a living nonetheless demonstrate an awareness and appreciation for the features of a good name in an Internet-based course delivery system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Branding is considered to be particularly important in the marketing of online educational programs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A survey directed at current and prospective graduate students at a traditional university asked about the desirability of 16 characteristics in the name of a new line of online courses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that contrary to the concerns expressed by some practitioners in the naming industry, college-educated individuals who do not create names for a living nonetheless demonstrate an awareness and appreciation for the features of a good name in an Internet-based course delivery system.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Naming · Online · Features

Abstract

Branding is considered to be particularly important in the marketing of online educational programs. A critical step to establishing the brand is naming the product appropriately. To this end, one can secure the services of professionals or rely on a do-it-yourself approach. The research reported here aimed to identify the features that non-professionals (graduate students) consider to be important in the name for an online educational product, and to compare these to the recommendations made by naming professionals (as reported in the literature). A survey directed at current and prospective graduate students at a traditional university asked about the desirability of 16 characteristics in the name of a new line of online courses. The six characteristics that were deemed most critical are (in order of importance): self-explanatory, memorable, easy to pronounce, has appealing associations, suggests/hints at the key features, and short. These are the same features that professionals in the business of creating new product names generally consider as best practices in creating a name. The results show that contrary to the concerns expressed by some practitioners in the naming industry, college-educated individuals who do not create names for a living nonetheless demonstrate an awareness and appreciation for the features of a good name in an Internet-based course delivery system.

🔖

Cite This Article

ROSZKOWSKI, M. J. (2013). What’s In A Name: The Amateur‘S View Of Good Practices In Naming An Online Educational Program. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 225–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/130559

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Aper, B. (2008, October 7). Naming and your bottom line: Naming in a recession. Retrieved from http://catchwordbranding.com/catchthis/brand-naming/naming-and- your-bottom-line Bao, Y., Shao, A., & Rivers, D. (2008). Creating new brand names: Effects of relevance, connotation, and pronunciation. Journal of Advertising Research, 48 (1), 148-162. Brighternaming.com (n.d). Do Automatic Name Generators Work? Retrieved from http://www.brighternaming.com/Name_Generators.html
  2. Chapleo, C. (2011). Exploring rationales for branding a university: Should we be seeking to measure branding in UK universities? Journal of Brand Management, 18, 411-4
  3. Daye, D. & Van Auken. B. (2010, January 21). Brand naming contest helps Boeing soar. Retrieved from contest-helps-boeing-soar.html de Winter, J. C. F., Dodou,D., & Wieringa, P. A. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 147–181.
  4. Delattre, E. (2002). Business name changes: The French experience. Journal of Small Business Management, 40, 360-367.
  5. Dunford, A. (2009). I know nothing about product naming (but that doesn’t stop me from doing it ). The Pragmatic Marketer Magazine: The Journal for Technology Product Gokaliler, E., & Sabuncuoglu Aybar, A. (2011). Brand management process for the online education programmes. In U. Demiray, & S. Sever (Eds.), Marketing online education programs: Frameworks for promotion and communication (pp. 56-74).
  6. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Hammel, S. (1997 October 5). What's in a name? For the pros, big bucks. US News & World Report. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/usnews/ biztech/articles/971013/ archive_008030.htm Hendricks, J. (2010). How to name new product, website, or service. Retrieved from http://jimmyhendricks.artistichub.com/2010/02/01/how-to-name-a-new-product- website-or-service Hogarty, K. Y., Hines, C.V., Kromrey, J.D., Ferron, J.M., & Mumford, K.R. (2005). The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The influence of sample size, communality, and overdetermination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 202-2 Igor International (2010, May 23). Building the perfect beast: The Igor naming guide to creating product and company names. San Francisco, CA: Igor International. Retrieved from http://www.igorinternational.com/process/naming-guide-product- company-names.php Keller, K. L., Heckler, S. E. & Houston, M. J. (1998). The effects of brand name suggestiveness on advertising recall. Journal of Marketin