SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 47 Sayı: 4

Identifying Predictors of Early Rebleeding Following Transcatheter Embolization in Acute Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Analysis

Akut Varis Dışı Üst Gastrointestinal Kanamada Transkateter Embolizasyonun Ardından Erken Tekrar Kanamanın Öngördürücülerinin Belirlenmesi: Retrospektif Bir Analiz

Ali Dablan(İstanbul başakşehir çam ve sakura şehir hastanesi)0000-0003-4198-4416
Yusuf Bahtiyar Uluman(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL BAŞAKŞEHİR ÇAM VE SAKURA ŞEHİR SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, RADYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI)0009-0004-1865-5600
Tevfik Güzelbey(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL BAŞAKŞEHİR ÇAM VE SAKURA ŞEHİR SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, RADYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0001-5330-169X
Mehmet Cingöz(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL BAŞAKŞEHİR ÇAM VE SAKURA ŞEHİR SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, RADYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-6937-2692
Erdem Kınacı(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL BAŞAKŞEHİR ÇAM VE SAKURA ŞEHİR SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ, CERRAHİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, GENEL CERRAHİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-0380-7585
Özgür Kılıçkesmez(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL BAŞAKŞEHİR ÇAM VE SAKURA ŞEHİR SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, RADYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0003-4658-2192
Pages
556–566
Publication Date
2025-06-18
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings highlight the importance of early and targeted intervention to improve clinical outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) is a critical medical emergency.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to identify predictors of early rebleeding within 30 days of TACE in refractory ANVUGIB cases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings highlight the importance of early and targeted intervention to improve clinical outcomes.
🔬Design:Klinik Araştırma
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Üst gastrointestinal kanama · Endoskopi · Anjiyografi

Abstract

Acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) is a critical medical emergency. While transcatheter arterial embolization (TACE) is increasingly utilized when endoscopic hemostasis fails, the risk factors for early rebleeding post-TACE remain unclear. This study aimed to identify predictors of early rebleeding within 30 days of TACE in refractory ANVUGIB cases. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 56 TACE procedures performed between June 2020 and June 2023. Patients were included based on strict criteria, including failed endoscopic hemostasis or unsuitability for endoscopy. We assessed variables associated with early rebleeding and conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to identify significant predictors. Despite a technical success rate of 100%, 39.3% of patients experienced early rebleeding. Significant predictors of rebleeding included delayed angiography (P = 0.023), comorbidities (P = 0.048), failed endoscopic hemostasis (P = 0.010), and embolization of multiple vascular territories (P = 0.012). Timely angiographic embolization is essential for effective bleeding control in ANVUGIB. Delayed angiography, presence of comorbidities, failed endoscopic hemostasis, and embolization of multiple vascular territories were identified as significant predictors of early rebleeding. These findings highlight the importance of early and targeted intervention to improve clinical outcomes.

Özet

Akut varis dışı üst gastrointestinal kanama (AVDÜGK), ciddi bir tıbbi acildir. Endoskopik hemostazın başarısız olduğu durumlarda transkateter arteriyel embolizasyon (TAKE) giderek daha fazla kullanılmakla birlikte, TAKE sonrası erken yeniden kanama risk faktörleri net değildir. Bu çalışma, dirençli AVDÜGK vakalarında TAKE’den sonraki 30 gün içinde erken yeniden kanama belirleyicilerini tespit etmeyi amaçlamıştır. Haziran 2020 ile Haziran 2023 arasında gerçekleştirilen 56 TAKE prosedürü üzerinde retrospektif bir analiz yapıldı. Hastalar, başarısız endoskopik hemostaz veya endoskopiye uygun olmama gibi katı kriterler doğrultusunda çalışmaya dahil edildi. Erken yeniden kanama ile ilişkili değişkenler değerlendirildi ve anlamlı belirleyicileri belirlemek için tek değişkenli ve çok değişkenli analizler yapıldı. Teknik başarı oranı %100 olmasına rağmen, hastaların %39,3’ünde erken yeniden kanama gözlendi. Yeniden kanamanın anlamlı belirleyicileri arasında gecikmiş anjiyografi (P = 0.023), eşlik eden hastalıklar (P = 0.048), başarısız endoskopik hemostaz (P = 0.010) ve birden fazla damar bölgesinin embolizasyonu (P = 0.012) yer almaktaydı. Bu bulgular, erken ve hedefe yönelik müdahalenin yeniden kanama riskini azaltmada önemli olduğunu göstermektedir. AVDÜGK’de başarılı kanama kontrolü için zamanında yapılan anjiyografik embolizasyon esastır. Gecikmiş anjiyografi, komorbiditeler, başarısız endoskopik hemostaz ve birden fazla damar bölgesine yapılan embolizasyon, erken yeniden kanama için anlamlı risk faktörleri olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu risk faktörleri, hasta sonuçlarını iyileştirmek amacıyla klinik karar süreçlerinde rehber olarak kullanılmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dablan, A., Uluman, Y. B., Güzelbey, T., Cingöz, M., Kınacı, E., Kılıçkesmez, Ö. (2025). Identifying Predictors of Early Rebleeding Following Transcatheter Embolization in Acute Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Analysis. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 47 Sayı: 4, 556–566. https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.1578761

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Loffroy R, Rao P, Ota S, De Lin M, Kwak BK, Geschwind JF. Embolization of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage resistant to endoscopic treatment: results and predictors of recurrent bleeding. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(6):1088-1100.
  2. Ferguson CB, Mitchell RM. Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: standard and new treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2005;34(4):607-621.
  3. Rollhauser C, Fleischer DE. Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy. 2004;36(1):52-58.
  4. Podila PV, Ben-Menachem T, Batra SK, Oruganti N, Posa P, Fogel R. Managing patients with acute, nonvariceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage: development and effectiveness of a clinical care pathway. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(1):208-219.
  5. Targownik LE, Nabalamba A. Trends in management and outcomes of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: 1993-2003 [published correction appears in Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Mar;5(3):403]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4(12):1459-1466.
  6. Larson G, Schmidt T, Gott J, Bond S, O'Connor CA, Richardson JD. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predictors of outcome. Surgery. 1986;100(4):765-773.
  7. McConnell DB, Baba GC, Deveney CW. Changes in surgical treatment of peptic ulcer disease within a veterans hospital in the 1970s and the 1980s. Arch Surg. 1989;124(10):1164-1167.
  8. Loffroy R, Guiu B, Cercueil JP, Pilleul F, Lévy P, Delabrousse E, et al. Refractory bleeding from gastroduodenal ulcers: arterial embolization in high-operative-risk patients. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42(4):361-367.
  9. Abdel-Aal AK, Bag AK, Saddekni S, Hamed MF, Ahmed FY. Endovascular management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25(7):755-763.
  10. Poultsides GA, Kim CJ, Orlando R 3rd, Peros G, Hallisey MJ, Vignati PV. Angiographic embolization for gastroduodenal hemorrhage: safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcome. Arch Surg. 2008;143(5):457-461.
  11. Larssen L, Moger T, Bjørnbeth BA, Lygren I, Kløw NE. Transcatheter arterial embolization in the management of bleeding duodenal ulcers: a 5.5-year retrospective study of treatment and outcome. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(2):217-222.
  12. Lee HH, Park JM, Chun HJ, Oh JS, Ahn HJ, Choi MG. Transcatheter arterial embolization for endoscopically unmanageable non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(7):809-815.
  13. Loffroy R, Rao P, Ota S, De Lin M, Kwak BK, Geschwind JF. Embolization of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage resistant to endoscopic treatment: results and predictors of recurrent bleeding. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(6):1088-1100.
  14. Shin JH. Recent update of embolization of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1)
  15. Aina R, Oliva VL, Therasse E, Perreault P, Bouchard L, Dufresne MP, Soulez G. Arterial embolotherapy for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: outcome assessment. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12(2):195-200.
  16. Laine L, Spiegel B, Rostom A, Baumgart DC, Cohen H, Dulai GS, et al. Methodology for randomized trials of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: recommendations from an international consensus conference. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(3):540-550.
  17. Angle JF, Siddiqi NH, Wallace MJ, Kundu S, Stokes L, Wojak JC, Cardella JF. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transcatheter embolization: Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(10):1479-1486.
  18. Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL. Cirse Quality Assurance Document and Standards for Classification of Complications: The Cirse Classification System. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(8):1141-1146.
  19. Cheynel N, Peschaud F, Hagry O, Rat P, Ognois-Ausset P, Favre JP. Ulcère gastroduodénal hémorragique: résultats du traitement chirurgical [Bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer: results of surgical management]. Ann Chir. 2001;126(3):232-235.
  20. Vellacott KD, Dronfield MW, Atkinson M, Langman MJ. Comparison of surgical and medical management of bleeding peptic ulcers. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;284(6315):548-550.
  21. Loffroy R, Guiu B, D'Athis P, Estivalet L, Pottecher P, Laurent A, Krausé D, et al. Arterial embolotherapy for endoscopically unmanageable acute gastroduodenal hemorrhage: predictors of early rebleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(5):515-523.
  22. Tarasconi A, Baiocchi GL, Pattonieri V, Trezzi M, Perrone G, Gaggiano A, et al. Transcatheter arterial embolization versus surgery for refractory non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg. 2019;14:3.
  23. Schoenberg MH. Surgical therapy for peptic ulcer and nonvariceal bleeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;386(2):98-103.
  24. Loffroy R, Falvo N, Nakai M, Pescatori L, Midulla M, Chevallier O. When all else fails - Radiological management of severe gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2019;42-43:101612.
  25. Lee S, Kim T, Han SC, Pak H, Jeon HH. Transcatheter arterial embolization for gastrointestinal bleeding: Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors predicting mortality. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(31)
  26. Walsh RM, Anain P, Geisinger M, Vogt D, Mayes J, Grundfest-Broniatowski S, Rhys-Evans P. Role of angiography and embolization for massive gastroduodenal hemorrhage. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3(1):61-66.
  27. Ini' C, Distefano G, Sanfilippo F, Luca F, Arena M, Basile A. Embolization for acute nonvariceal bleeding of upper and lower gastrointestinal tract: a systematic review. CVIR Endovasc. 2023;6(1):18.
  28. Yu Q, Funaki B, Navuluri R, Lorenz JM, Ray CE, Saad WE, et al. Empiric Transcatheter Embolization for Acute Arterial Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;216(4):880-893.
  29. Spiliopoulos S, Inchingolo R, Lucatelli P, Posa A, Konstantos C, Pompili G, et al. Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Bleeding Peptic Ulcers: A Multicenter Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(9):1333-1339.
  30. Zhou CG, Shi HB, Liu S, Wang JH, Zhu HD, Shen W. Transarterial embolization for massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage following abdominal surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(40):6869-6875.
  31. Puppala S, Patel J, McPherson S, Nicholson A, Kessel D. Hemorrhagic complications after Whipple surgery: imaging and radiologic intervention. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(1):192-197.
  32. Wang X, He C, Li H, Huang J, Ge N, Yang Y. Endovascular treatment for delayed post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage of unusual origin (splenic artery branch). J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2022;8(4):865-871.
  33. Biondetti P, Fumarola EM, Ierardi AM, Carrafiello G. Bleeding complications after pancreatic surgery: interventional radiology management. Gland Surg. 2019;8(2):150-163.
  34. Augustin AM, Fluck F, Bley T, Kickuth R. Endovascular Therapy of Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Rofo. 2019;191(12):1073-1082.