SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 48 Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Patient–Physician Orientation and Empathy Levels of Research Assistant Physicians Working in a University Hospital

Bir Üniversite Hastanesinde Çalışan Araştırma Görevlisi Hekimlerin Hasta-Hekim Yönelimi ve Empati Düzeylerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Tuğçe Arslan Torba(Eskişehir Tepebaşı İlçe Sağlık Müdürlüğü)0000-0002-5844-7775
Alaettin Ünsal(ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-8353-1605
Ahmet Ay(Erzincan İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü)0000-0001-5922-6272
Ali Kılınç(Beyşehir İlçe Sağlık Müdürlüğü)0000-0002-0577-8570
Didem Arslantaş(ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-5263-3710
Kazım Tırpan(Kemal Nurhan Mani Aile Sağlığı Merkezi)0000-0001-5275-2712
Pages
419–426
Publication Date
2026-05-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended to provide training for physicians on this topic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to examine the orientations of physicians working as research assistants regarding the patient-physician relationship, to investigate some variables thought to be related, and to evaluate their empathy levels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 264 (73.3%) research assistants who agreed to complete the questionnaire participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended to provide training for physicians on this topic.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:hasta-hekim yönelimi · araştırma görevlisi · empati

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the orientations of physicians working as research assistants regarding the patient-physician relationship, to investigate some variables thought to be related, and to evaluate their empathy levels. Research assistant physicians working at Eskisehir Osmangazi University Health, Practice, and Research Hospital were included in the study. A questionnaire comprising the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), the Jefferson Empathy Scale (JES), and questions about sociodemographic characteristics was used. A total of 264 (73.3%) research assistants who agreed to complete the questionnaire participated in the study. The data obtained were analyzed using the SPSS statistical package program (version 31.0). The mean age of the study group was 30.2 ± 5.07 years. Among the participants, 145 (54.9%) were female, and 173 (65.5%) were working in the department of internal medical sciences. Additionally, 192 (72.7%) of the physicians reported not having participated in any activities related to patient-physician orientation. The median total score of the physicians on the PPOS was 50. Multivariate analysis revealed that physicians who were married, had fewer patients per day, and exhibited higher levels of empathy demonstrated a more patient-centered approach. This study reveals that research assistant physicians tend to adopt a patient-centered approach. This approach can be enhanced by reducing physicians' daily workload and increasing the time allocated to each patient. It is recommended to provide training for physicians on this topic.

Özet

Bu çalışma, araştırma görevlisi olarak çalışan hekimlerin hasta-hekim ilişkisine yönelik yönelimlerini incelemek, ilişkili olabileceği düşünülen bazı değişkenleri araştırmak ve empati düzeylerini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sağlık, Uygulama ve Araştırma Hastanesi’nde görev yapan araştırma görevlisi hekimler dâhil edilmiştir. Katılımcılara, Hasta-Hekim Yönelim Ölçeği (Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale, PPOS), Jefferson Empati Ölçeği (Jefferson Empathy Scale, JES) ve sosyodemografik özellikleri içeren sorulardan oluşan bir anket uygulanmıştır. Anketi doldurmayı kabul eden toplam 264 (%73,3) araştırma görevlisi çalışmaya katılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS istatistik paket programı (sürüm 31.0) kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma grubunun yaş ortalaması 30,2 ± 5,07 yıldır. Katılımcıların 145’i (%54,9) kadın olup, 173’ü (%65,5) dahili tıp bilimleri bölümünde çalışmaktadır. Ayrıca hekimlerin 192’si (%72,7) hasta-hekim yönelimiyle ilgili herhangi bir etkinliğe katılmadığını bildirmiştir. Hekimlerin PPOS toplam puanının ortancası 50’dir. Çok değişkenli analiz sonuçlarına göre, evli olan, günlük hasta sayısı daha az olan ve empati düzeyi yüksek hekimlerin daha hasta odaklı bir yaklaşım sergilediği belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışma, araştırma görevlisi hekimlerin genel olarak hasta odaklı bir yaklaşımı benimsediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu yaklaşımın güçlendirilmesi için hekimlerin günlük iş yükünün azaltılması ve her hastaya ayrılan sürenin artırılması önerilmektedir. Ayrıca hekimlere bu konuda eğitim verilmesi tavsiye edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Torba, T. A., Ünsal, A., Ay, A., Kılınç, A., Arslantaş, D., Tırpan, K. (2026). Evaluation of Patient–Physician Orientation and Empathy Levels of Research Assistant Physicians Working in a University Hospital. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 48 Sayı: 3, 419–426. https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.1809447

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Balint E. The possibilities of patient-centered medicine. J R Coll Gen Pract 1969;17(82):269-76
  2. Engel GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry 1980;137(5):535-44.
  3. Sezer Korucu K, Çalışkan Söylemez Ş, Oksay A. Biyopsikososyal yaklaşım ve gelişim süreci. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi 2021;12(30):689-700.
  4. McWhinney IR. The need for a transformed clinical method. In: Stewart M, Roter D, editors. Communicating with Medical Patients. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1989. p. 25-40.
  5. Şahin G, İğde FA. Hasta merkezli bakım-ortak karar alma süreci ve kalite. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Family Medicine-Special Topics 2014;5(3):38-43.
  6. Riedl D, Schüßler G. The influence of doctor-patient communication on health outcomes: A systematic review. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 2017;63(2):131-50.
  7. Bertakis KD, Azari R. Patient-centered care is associated with decreased health care utilization. J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24(3):229-39.
  8. Sibille K, Greene A, Bush JP. Preparing physicians for the 21st century: targeting communication skills and the promotion of health behavior change. Ann Behav Sci Med Educ 2010;16(1):7-13.
  9. Moffat M, Cleland J, van der Molen T, Price D. Sub-optimal patient and physician communication in primary care consultations: its relation to severe and difficult asthma. Prim Care Respir J 2006;15(3):159-65.
  10. Abiola T, Udofia O, Abdullahi AT. Patient-doctor relationship: The practice orientation of doctors in Kano. Niger J Clin Pract 2014;17(2):241-7.
  11. Batenburg V, Smal JA, Lodder A, De Melker RA. Are professional attitudes related to gender and medical specialty? Med Educ 1999;33(7):489-92.
  12. Hemmerdinger JM, Stoddart SD, Lilford RJ. A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine. BMC Med Educ 2007;7:24.
  13. Patel S, Pelletier-Bui A, Smith S, Roberts MB, Kilgannon H, Trzeciak S, et al. Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: A systematic review. PLoS One 2019;14(8):e0221412.
  14. Krupat E, Hiam CM, Fleming MZ, Freeman P. Patient-centeredness and its correlates among first year medical students. Int J Psychiatry Med 1999;29(3):347-56
  15. Özdemir S, Edirne T. Hasta-Hekim Yönelim Ölçeğinin (HHYÖ) Türkçeye uyarlanması. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 2018;17(51):21-32.
  16. Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, Cohen MJM, Gonnella JS, Erdmann JB, et al. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Development and preliminary psychometric data. Educ Psychol Meas 2001;61(2):349–65.
  17. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Veloski JJ, Magee M. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Further psychometric data and differences by gender and specialty at item level. Acad Med 2002;77(10 Suppl):S58-60.
  18. Gönüllü İ, Öztuna D. A Turkish adaptation of the student version of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. Marmara Medical Journal 2012;25(2):87-92.
  19. Jung CG. Psychological types. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 2014.
  20. Sümbüloğlu K, Sümbüloğlu V. Biyoistatistik. 13th ed. Ankara: Hatiboğlu Yayınları; 2009.
  21. Perestelo-Pérez L, Rivero-Santana A, González-González AI, Bermejo-Caja CJ, Ramos-García V, Koatz D, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the patient-practitioner orientation scale among primary care professionals in Spain. Health Expect 2021;24(1):33–41.
  22. Moore M. What do Nepalese medical students and doctors think about patient-centred communication? Patient Educ Couns 2009;76(1):38–43.
  23. Shin DW, Roter DL, Roh YK, Hahm SK, Cho B, Park H-K. Physician gender and patient centered communication: the moderating effect of psychosocial and biomedical case characteristics. Patient Educ Couns 2015;98(1):55–60.
  24. Hall JA, Gulbrandsen P, Dahl FA. Physician gender, physician patient-centered behavior, and patient satisfaction: a study in three practice settings within a hospital. Patient Educ Couns 2014;95(3):313–8.
  25. Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor–patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns 2000;39(1):49–59.
  26. Whitley TW, Allison EJ Jr, Gallery ME, Cockington RA, Gaudry P, Heyworth J, et al. Work-related stress and depression among practicing emergency physicians: an international study. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23(5):1068–71.
  27. Şahin G. Hasta merkezli bakım konusunda hekimlerin ve hastaların algı ve görüşleri [dissertation]. Samsun: Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi; 2017.
  28. Chan CMH, Ahmad WAW. Differences in physician attitudes towards patient-centredness: across four medical specialties. Int J Clin Pract 2012;66(1):16–20.
  29. Song W, Hao Y, Cui Y, Zhao X, Liu W, Tao S, et al. Attitudes of medical professionals towards patient-centredness: a cross-sectional study in H City, China. BMJ Open 2022;12(1):e045542.
  30. Tsimtsiou Z, Benos A, Garyfallos AA, Hatzichristou D. Predictors of physicians’ attitudes toward sharing information with patients and addressing psychosocial needs: a cross-sectional study in Greece. Health Commun 2012;27(3):257–63.
  31. Wimmers PF, Stuber ML. Assessing medical students’ empathy and attitudes towards patient-centered care with an existing clinical performance exam (OSCE). Procedia-Social Behav Sci 2010;2(2):1911–3.