SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2

A Bibliometric Analysis of Laboratory Safety: Its Significance for the Discipline of Chemistry

Laboratuvar Güvenliğinin Bibliyometrik Analizi: Kimya Disiplini için Önemi

Mustafa Tuğbay Emiroğlu(Hacettepe Üniversitesi)0009-0000-6926-060X
Ayhan Yılmaz(Hacettepe Üniversitesi)0000-0003-4252-5510
Pages
271–290
Publication Date
2024-12-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most commonly used keywords were identified as “laboratory safety,” “safety hazards,” and “laboratory management.”

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Laboratory safety is a multidisciplinary field of research that is highly significant for science education, and especially for the discipline of chemistry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, a total of 279 works published on laboratory safety between 1965 and 2024 and indexed in the Web of Science database were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most commonly used keywords were identified as “laboratory safety,” “safety hazards,” and “laboratory management.”
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bibliyometrik analiz · VOSviewer · laboratuvar güvenliği

Abstract

Laboratory safety is a multidisciplinary field of research that is highly significant for science education, and especially for the discipline of chemistry. This study addresses the developments, primary fields of study, and research tendencies related to the scope and application of laboratory safety in chemistry. The study utilized a survey research design from among descriptive methods and applied a bibliometric analysis technique. To this end, a total of 279 works published on laboratory safety between 1965 and 2024 and indexed in the Web of Science database were analyzed. The analyses encompassed 60 countries, 279 publications, 51 authors, and 43 subject categories. Findings were analyzed using VOSviewer via the bibliometric analysis method. According to the obtained results, the country with the highest number of relevant publications is the United States, the institution with the highest number of published articles is the University of California system, the journal with the highest number of articles is Journal of Chemical Education, and the researchers with the highest numbers of publications are Nancy L. Wayne and Xiaoyan Wang, followed by Imke Schröder, James H. Gibson, and Xinglong Jin. Although many researchers study the subject of laboratory safety, it is seen that the cooperation among authors is extremely weak. The most commonly used keywords were identified as “laboratory safety,” “safety hazards,” and “laboratory management.”

Özet

Laboratuvar güvenliği fen eğitimi ve özellikle kimya disiplini için oldukça önemli ve multidisipliner bir araştırma alanıdır. Bu çalışmada, kimya disiplininde laboratuvar güvenliğinin kapsamına ve uygulanmasına ilişkin gelişmeler, odak çalışma alanları ve eğilimler incelenmiştir. Araştırmada, betimsel yöntemlerden tarama modeli kullanılmış ve bibliyometrik analiz tekniği uygulanmıştır. Bu amaç kapsamında, 1965 ve 2024 yılları arasında laboratuvar güvenliği alanında Web of Science (WoS) Veri Tabanı’nda yayınlanan toplam 279 makale incelenmiştir. İncelemelerde 60 ülke, 279 araştırma, 51 yazar ve 43 konu kategorisi bulunmaktadır. Bulgular, VOSviewer ile bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre ; araştırma alanı ile ilgili en fazla yayın yapılan ülkenin Amerika Birleşik Devletleri(ABD) olduğu, en fazla makale yayınlayan kurum University of California System , en fazla makale yayınlanan dergi Journal of Chemical Education, en fazla çalışma yapan araştırmacı Nancy L. Wayne ve Xiaoyan Wang olduğu ve bu araştırmacıları, Imke Schröeder, James H. Gibson ve Xinglong Jin izlediği tespit edilmiştir. Laboratuvar güvenliği konusunda çok sayıda bilim insanı araştırma yapmış olsa da yazarlar arasında işbirliğinin son derece zayıf olduğu saptanmıştır. En fazla kullanılan anahtar kelimeler laboratory safety, safety hazards laboratory management olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Emiroğlu, M. T., Yılmaz, A., *, M. T. E. (2024). A Bibliometric Analysis of Laboratory Safety: Its Significance for the Discipline of Chemistry. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 271–290. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1519282

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (40)

  1. Agustian, H. Y., & Seery, M. K. (2017). Reasserting the role of pre-laboratory activities in chemistry education: a proposed framework for their design. Chemistry Education Research,18, 518-532. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00140A
  2. Akpullukcu, S. (2017). The effects of laboratory safety professional development seminars implemented on science teachers: Laboratory safety knowledge levels (Publication No. 486439) [Doctoral dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  3. Alaimo, P.J.,Langenhan, J.M., Joseph M.,Tanner, M.J., & Ferrenberg, S.M.(2010). Safety teams: An approach to engage students in laboratory safety, Journal of Chemical Education, 87(8), 2825-2836. https://pubs.acs.org/journal/jceda8
  4. Arslan, E. (2022). Bibliometric mapping in social sciences research using VOSviewer and an implementation, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 33-56. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2864384
  5. Atasoy, B. (2002). Fen öğrenimi ve öğretimi. Gündüz Eğitim ve Yayıncılık.
  6. Ayana, U.C., Walters, W., Lawrence, N., & Jalsa K. (2017). Chemical laboratory safety awareness, attitudes and practices of tertiary students. Safety Science, 96, 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.017
  7. Ayi, H. R., & Hon, C. Y. (2018). Safety culture and safety compliance in academic laboratories: a Canadian perspective. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 25, 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2018.05.002
  8. Block, J., & Fisch, C. (2020). Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research. Management Review Quarterly, (70), 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00188-4
  9. Çepni, S., Akdeniz, A. R., & Ayas, A. (1994). Fen bilimleri eğitiminde laboratuvarın yeri ve önemi (III): Ülkemizde laboratuvarın kullanımı ve bazı öneriler. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 206, 24-28.
  10. De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics. Scarecrow. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=ma4YjaKyM9cC&printsec=frontcover&hl=tr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.
  11. Demir, E. (2016). Investigating the physical conditions of the science laboratories and science teachers' level of knowledge about laboratory safety (Publication No. 451833) [Master’s thesis, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  12. Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M.Á., Moral-Muñoz, J.A., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2017). Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. Applied Intelligence, 48, 1275-1287. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y
  13. Hill, R. H. (2007). The emergence of laboratory safety. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 14(3), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2006.10.001
  14. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
  15. Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791-806. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20072
  16. Kurutkan, M. N., & Orhan, F. (2018). Bilim haritalama, bibliyometrik analiz ve kitap ile ilgili genel hususlar. M. N. Kurutkan & F. Orhan (Eds.), Sağlık Politikası Konusunun Bilim Haritalama Teknikleri ile Analizi (pp. 1-12). İksad. https://iksadyayinevi.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/SAĞLIK-POLİTİKASI-KONUSUNUN-BİLİM-HARİTALAMA-TEKNİKLERİ-İLE-ANALİZİ.pdf
  17. McBurney, M. K., & Novak, P. L. (2002). What is bibliometrics and why should you care? Proceedings of Professional Communication Conference, USA, 108-114. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2002.1049094
  18. Menard, A. D., & Trant, J. F. (2020). A review and critique of academic lab safety research. Nature Chemistry, 12, 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0375-x
  19. Meyer, T. (2017). Towards the implementation of a safety education program in a teaching and research institution. Education for Chemical Engineers, 18, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2015.06.003
  20. Miller G. J., Heideman S. A., & Greenbowe T. J. (2000). Introducing proper chemical hygiene and safety in the general chemistry curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(9), 1185-1187. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p1185
  21. Morgil, İ. F., & Yılmaz, A. (2000). Sicheres Arbeiten bei Lehramtsstudenten der Chemie in einer Türkischen Universitaet. Chemkon, 7(4),198-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/ckon.20000070407
  22. Nasrallah, I. M., El Kak, A. K., Ismil, L. A., Nasr R. R., & Bawab, W. T. (2022). Prevalence of accident occurrence among scientific laboratory workers of the public university in lebanon and the impact of safety measures. Safety and Health at Work, 13(2), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2022.02.001
  23. Olewski, T., & Snakard, M. (2017). Challenges in applying process safety management at university laboratories. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 49(B), 209−214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.06.013
  24. Omidvari, M., Mansouri, N., & Nouri, J. (2015). A pattern of fire risk assessment and emergency management in educational center laboratories. Safety Science, 73, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.003
  25. Pluess, D. N., Meyer, T., Masin, J., Mikulasek, P., & Ferjencik, M., (2016). Joint applicability test of software for laboratory assessment and risk analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 40, 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.026
  26. Schröder, I., Huang, D. Y. Q., Ellis, O., Gibson, J. H., & Wayne, N. L. (2016). Laboratory safety attitudes and practices: A comparison of academic, government, and industry researchers. Journal of Chemical Health & Safety, 23(1), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2015.03.001
  27. Seery, M. K., Hendra, Y., Agustian, H. Y., & Xinchi Zhang, X. (2018). A Framework for learning in the chemistry laboratory. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59, 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201800093
  28. Sigmann, S. (2018). Chemical safety education for the 21st century fostering safety information competency in chemists. Journal of Chemical Health & Safety,25(3), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2017.11.002
  29. Stuart, R., & Toreki, R. (2014). Learning opportunities in three years of hazmat headlines. Journal of Chemical Health & Safety, 21(2), 2−8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2013.11.002
  30. Şener, F. (2018). Scientific laboratory accidents reflected by printed and visual media that are occured in schools (Publication No. 515967) [Master’s thesis, Hacettepe University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  31. Tepe, M., & Tekbıyık A. (2019). Ortaokul fen bilimleri ders kitaplarının deney ve etkinlik güvenliği bakımından değerlendirilmesi, Millî Eğitim, 48(1), 223-240. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/milliegitim/issue/51765/673202
  32. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  33. Walters, A. U. C., Lawrence, W., & Jalsa, N. K. (2017). Chemical laboratory safety awareness, attitudes and practices of tertiary students, Safety Science, 96, 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.017
  34. Wangdi, D., & Tshomo, S. (2016). Investigating chemical laboratory safety based on students’ ability to recognize the common laboratory hazard symbols. Educational Innovation and Practice. 1(1), 41-52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325710061
  35. Weil, M. (2016). The laboratory safety standard at 25: implementation of the standard through the chemical hygiene plan and the chemical hygiene officer – is it trickling down? Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 23(5), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2016.01.002
  36. Yang, Y., Reniers, G., Chen, G., & Goerlandt, F. (2019). A bibliometric review of laboratory safety in universities. Safety Science, 120, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.022
  37. Yılmaz, A. (2023, September 6-8). Laboratuvarda Güvenli Çalışma ve Öğrenme Ortamlarının Öneminin Ne Kadar Farkındayız?. [Keynote], 8. Ulusal Kimya Eğitimi Kongresi, Marmara University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  38. Yılmaz, A. (2015). Laboratuvarda Güvenli Çalışma, Hacettepe Üniversitesi. https://library.hacettepe.edu.tr/hubooks/index.php?fn=read&key=429e6c
  39. Yoon, D. (2021). Operational Process for R&D Laboratory Safety, SAGE Open, 11(1),1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020988853
  40. Zhu, B., Feng, M., Lowe, H., Kesselman, J., Harrison, L., & Dempski, R.E. (2018). Increasing enthusiasm and enhancing learning for biochemistry-laboratory safety with an augmented- reality program. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(10), 1747–1754. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00116