Journals / Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2

Examining Game Designs Compatible with the Planning, Implementation, Evaluation Model in the Context of Science Education

Fen Eğitiminde Planlama, Uygulama, Değerlendirme Modeline Uygun Oyun Tasarımlarının İncelenmesi

Pages
219–247
Publication Date
2024-12-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was also established that the pre-service teachers primarily incorporated environmental awareness and subsequently knowledge in their games as part of the environmental literacy components.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine the general features, quality, PIE (Planning, Implementation, Evaluation) model compliance, and environmental literacy of games created by pre-service science teachers using the PIE methodology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The pre-service teachers were instructed to create a game using the PIE model while taking into account the environmental learning outcomes listed in the Ministry of National Education’s (MoNE) 2018 Science Curriculum.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was also established that the pre-service teachers primarily incorporated environmental awareness and subsequently knowledge in their games as part of the environmental literacy components.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Eğitsel oyunlar · fen eğitimi · PIE modeli

Abstract

This study aims to examine the general features, quality, PIE (Planning, Implementation, Evaluation) model compliance, and environmental literacy of games created by pre-service science teachers using the PIE methodology. The research participants were pre-service science teachers who were enrolled in the elective course “Science, Sustainability and Environment (SSE)” as third-grade undergraduate students. The pre-service teachers were instructed to create a game using the PIE model while taking into account the environmental learning outcomes listed in the Ministry of National Education’s (MoNE) 2018 Science Curriculum. Three researchers assessed each of 13 designs independently, and reliability was determined using Miles and Huberman's formula (1994). The study's findings showed that the majority of the games were card games, and they were authentic. It was determined that the games met the PIE model's requirements for quality and compatibility. It was also established that the pre-service teachers primarily incorporated environmental awareness and subsequently knowledge in their games as part of the environmental literacy components.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, fen bilgisi öğretmen adayları tarafından PIE (Planla, Uygula, Değerlendir) modeline göre tasarlanan oyunları; genel özellikleri, niteliği, PIE modeline uygunluğu ve çevre okuryazarlığı bileşenleri açısından incelemektir. Bu amaçla 3. Sınıfta öğrenim gören ve Fen, Sürdürülebilirlik ve Çevre (FSÇ) seçmeli dersini alan fen bilimleri öğretmen adayları araştırmaya katılmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarından Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı 2018 Fen Bilimleri Öğretim Programındaki çevre konulu kazanımlar ele alınarak PIE modeline göre oyun tasarımı yapmaları istenmiştir. Tasarımlar üç araştırmacı tarafından birbirinden bağımsız olacak şekilde değerlendirilmiş ve Miles ve Huberman’in (1994) sunduğu uyuşum formülü ile güvenirliğine bakılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda oyunların çoğunlukla kart oyunu türü olduğu ve özgün tasarım oldukları görülmüştür. Oyunların nitelik bakımında yeterli ve PIE modelinin çerçevesine uygun tasarımlar olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarının oyunlarında çevre okuryazarlık bileşenlerinden en çok farkındalık ardından da bilgi bileşenlerine yer verdikleri tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yumak, S., Öçsoy, K., Öztürk, S., Benzer, E., *, S. Y. (2024). Examining Game Designs Compatible with the Planning, Implementation, Evaluation Model in the Context of Science Education. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 219–247. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1392825

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (47)

  1. Akcanca, N., & Sömen, T. (2018). Prospective teachers’ educational game designing and applications. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(27), 49-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.14506
  2. Akgül, G., & Kılıç, M. (2020). Preservice science teachers’ views on educational digital games and KODU implementations. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 8(2),101-120. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fbod/issue/71992/1158003
  3. Alınmaz, N. (2023). Investigation of pre-school teachers’ competencies on environmental literacy (Publication No. 774963) [Master’s thesis, Kastamonu University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  4. Altınöz, N. (2010). Environmental literacy levels of prospective science teachers (Publication No. 274704) [Master’s thesis, Sakarya University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  5. Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2-16. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02904348
  6. Aymen Peker, E. (2018). Evaluation of teaching the unit of titled ‘Let’s travel and learn about the living world’ for 5th grades with classic educational games and educational games supported with technology (Publication No. 492301) [Doctoral dissertation, Ondokuz Mayıs University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  7. Beker Baş, M., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2020). An educational game on central and peripheral nervous system. Gazi Journal of Educational Science, 6(1), 80-92. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gebd/issue/53429/643014
  8. Benzer, E. (2010). The effect of environmental education lesson prepared with project-based learning approach on pre-service science teachers’ environmental literacy (Publication No. 279892) [Doctoral dissertation, Marmara University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  9. Bilim, İ. (2012). Sustainable environment perspective faculty of education students’ levels of environmental literacy (Publication No. 330235) [Master’s thesis, Afyon Kocatepe University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  10. Cop, M. R., & Kablan, Z. (2018). The analysis of studies on educational games in Turkey. Kocaeli University Journal of Education, 1(1), 52-71. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kuje/issue/37623/422759
  11. Çakır, A. (2022). The effect of educational games developed for the third grade science course five sense unit on the academic success of students (Publication No. 770891) [Master’s thesis, Amasya University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  12. Dolunay, A., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2021). Opinions of science teachers about educational games: “The fastest sound” game”. International Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 2021(16), 48-69. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/goputeb/issue/62038/872860
  13. Durdut, A. (2016). Improving an educational computer game in mathematics for vocational school students and the effects of success (Publication No. 456152) [Master’s thesis, Balıkesir University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  14. Fang, W. T., Hassan, A. A., & LePage, B. A. (2022). The living environmental education: Sound science toward a cleaner, safer, and healthier future. Springer.
  15. Fırat, S. (2011). The effects of mathematics teaching performed through educational computer games on conceptual learning (Publication No. 301095) [Doctoral dissertation, Adıyaman University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  16. Fidan Yazgan, P. (2023). Comparison of the objectives in the national science curriculum and optional environmental education programs in the context of environmental literacy (Publication No. 783659) [Master’s thesis, Marmara University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  17. Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated?. Computers & Education, 46(3), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.007
  18. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy?. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595
  19. Herodotou, C. (2018). Mobile games and science learning: A comparative study of 4 and 5 years old playing the game Angry Birds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12546
  20. Jacobson, S. K., McDuff, M. D., & Monroe, M. C. (2006). Conservation education and outreach techniques (Techniques in ecology and conservation). Oxford University Press.
  21. Karamustafaoğlu, O., & Baran, S. (2020). Teachers’ views about science teaching with ‘Force capturing’ the educational game. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 8(1), 76-91. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fbod/issue/71986/1158007
  22. Karamustafaoğlu, O., & Kılıç, M. F. (2020). Investigation of national scientific studies about educational games. Atatürk University Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, (40), 1-25. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunikkefd/issue/55385/730393
  23. Kefeli, N., Taş, E. & Yalçın, M. (2018). The effect of teaching science with word games on the attitudes of students towards environment. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 2(3), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.388619
  24. Keleş, E., Fiş Erümit, S., Özkale, A., & Aksoy, N. (2016). A roadmap for instructional designers: A comparison of instructional design models. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 49(1), 105-139. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001377
  25. Kılıç, M., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2020). Teachers’ view on blood catching educational game. Journal of Science Mathematics Entrepreneurship and Technology Education, 3(3),144-158. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fmgted/issue/60204/838898
  26. Kırmızıyüz, E., Ercan, D., & Uz Bilgin, Ç. (2021). Designing, developing and implementing an educational mobile game on electrical energy conversion and recycling. Yıldız Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.51280/yjer.2021.013
  27. Kirriemuir, J., & McFarlane, A. (2003, January). Use of computer and video games in the classroom [Conference Paper] Proceedings of DiGRA 2003 Conference: Level Up, Utrecth, Holland. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221217309_Use_of_Computer_and_Video_Games_in_the_Classroom
  28. Kocadere, S. A., Özhan, Ş. Ç., Bayrak, F. & Kibar P.N. (2019). Story of Hercules: An educational game development model proposal. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 9(1), 230-250. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.451990
  29. Korkmaz, S. (2018). Development and effectiveness of educational games in science teaching as supplementary material on students' achievement and attitude towards science (Publication No. 502718) [Master’s thesis, Bartın University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  30. Külegel, S. (2020). A research to improve the 21st century skills of gifted and talented students of environmental education-based science, technology, engineering, mathematics activities (Publication No. 640643) [Master’s thesis, Yıldız Teknik University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  31. Lee, K. M., Jeong, E. J., Park, N., & Ryu, S. (2011). Effects of interactivity in educational games: A mediating role of social presence on learning outcomes. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27(7), 620-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.555302
  32. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
  33. Ministry of Education (MoNE) (2018). İlköğretim kurumları (ilkokullar ve ortaokullar) fen bilimleri dersi (3,4,5,6,7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812312311937-FEN%20B%C4%B0L%C4%B0MLER%C4%B0%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI2018.pdf
  34. Mutlu Karanfil, B. (2022). Investigation of the effect of portfolio-based environmental education with family participation on environmental awareness of 5th grade students (Publication No. 708253) [Master’s thesis, Trakya University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  35. Önen, F., Demir, S., & Şahin, F. (2012). Science teacher candidates’ views about games and evaluating prepared games by them. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 13(3), 299-318. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefad/issue/59486/854950
  36. Özen, G., Timurkaan Akçınar, S., Güllü, M., Meriç, F., Uğraş, S., & Çelik Çoban, D., (2019). Spor liseleri 12. sınıf eğitsel oyunlar ders kitabı. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
  37. Özgürler, S. (2014). Investigation of environmental literacy level and ecological footsprint of teacher candidates (Publication No. 380580) [Master’s thesis, Amasya University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  38. Özkan, G., Akça, E., & Umdu Topsakal, Ü., (2020). The effect of game-based teaching on students’ attitudes towards the science course and views. The Journal of International Social Research, 13(70), 794-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2020.4135
  39. Serdaroğlu, C., & Güneş, M. H. (2019). Effects on academic achievement and attitude of game based learning in teaching of reproduction, growth and development unit in 6th grade plant and animal. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 1015-1041. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.570616
  40. Şahin, S., Ünlü, E., & Ünlü, S. (2016). Investigation of teacher candidates’ environmental literacy awareness level. Education Sciences, 11(2), 82-95. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/nwsaedu/issue/19844/212575
  41. Seçkin Kapucu, M., & Çağlak, S. (2018). Pre-service science teachers’ skills and experience on designing educational games: A case study. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, (29), 536-573. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.364051
  42. Şentürk, C. (2020). The effects of game-based science learning experiences on academic achievement, retention, attitudes and learning process. The Journal of National Education, 49(227), 159-194. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/milliegitim/issue/56322/616595
  43. Şimşek, A. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  44. Teksöz, G., Şahin, E., & Ertepınar, H. (2010), Environmental literacy, pre-service teachers and a sustainable future. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 39, 307-320. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hunefd/issue/7799/102184
  45. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin.
  46. Yıldırım, M., & Can, S. (2017). “Deal or no deal”: Should science lesson be taught with instructional games?. Atatürk University Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, 35,14-30. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunikkefd/issue/33367/336640
  47. Yıldız, E., Şimşek, Ü., & Araz, H. (2016). The effect of the educational game method on academic achievement and motivation towards science learning in teaching of circulatory system. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 13(36) 20-32. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mkusbed/issue/44301/547052