SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış / 2026 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 79

THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ON ESG SCORES: A STUDY OF THE BANKING SECTOR IN OECD COUNTRIES

FİNANSAL PERFORMANSIN ESG SKORLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: OECD ÜLKELERİ BANKACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR İNCELEME

Gökhan Kılıç(BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0605-2798
Bade Ekim Kocaman(BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8967-3935
Pages
337–356
Publication Date
2026-09-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that both financial performance indicators exhibit an asymmetric effect on ESG scores across quantiles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although the effects of sustainability on financial performance have been extensively examined in the literature, it appears that studies addressing the impact of financial performance on sustainability remain relatively limited.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to investigate the effect of financial performance on ESG disclosure scores in banks operating in OECD countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal that both financial performance indicators exhibit an asymmetric effect on ESG scores across quantiles.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2010–2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:ESG Skoru · Bankacılık Sektörü · Finansal Performans

Abstract

Although the effects of sustainability on financial performance have been extensively examined in the literature, it appears that studies addressing the impact of financial performance on sustainability remain relatively limited. This study aims to investigate the effect of financial performance on ESG disclosure scores in banks operating in OECD countries. Using annual data covering the period 2010–2022, panel quantile regression was applied to a sample of 284 banks. The findings reveal that both financial performance indicators exhibit an asymmetric effect on ESG scores across quantiles. While the effect of ROA on ESG scores is positive and significant at the median and upper quantiles, the coefficient turns negative at the lower quantile. Regarding ROE, a positive and statistically significant relationship is observed at the median and upper quantiles, whereas this relationship becomes insignificant at the lower quantiles. Overall, the findings confirm that the effect of financial performance on ESG disclosures follows a non-linear pattern, with this effect becoming more pronounced at the upper quantiles.

Özet

Sürdürülebilirliğin finansal performans üzerindeki etkileri literatürde kapsamlı biçimde incelenmiş olmakla birlikte, finansal performansın sürdürülebilirlik üzerindeki etkisini ele alan çalışmaların görece sınırlı kaldığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışma, OECD ülkelerinde faaliyet gösteren bankalarda finansal performansın ESG skorları üzerindeki etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. 2010-2022 dönemine ait yıllık veriler kullanılarak 284 bankayı kapsayan örneklemde panel kantil regresyon yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, her iki finansal performans göstergesinin de ESG skorları üzerinde kantiller arasında asimetrik bir etki sergilediğini ortaya koymaktadır. ROA'nın ESG skoru üzerindeki etkisi medyan ve üst kantillerde pozitif ve anlamlı iken, alt kantilde katsayı negatife dönmektedir. ROE açısından ise medyan ve üst kantillerde pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki gözlemlenirken, alt kantillerde bu ilişki anlamsızlaşmaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular, finansal performansın ESG açıklamaları üzerindeki etkisinin doğrusal olmayan bir yapı sergilediğini ve bu etkinin özellikle üst kantillerde belirginleştiğini teyit etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kılıç, G., Kocaman, B. E. (2026). THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ON ESG SCORES: A STUDY OF THE BANKING SECTOR IN OECD COUNTRIES. Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 79, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.55322/mdbakis.1917203

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (58)

  1. Ahmad, N., Mobarek, A., & Roni, N. N. (2021). Revisiting the impact of ESG on financial performance of FTSE350 UK firms: Static and dynamic panel data analysis. Cogent Business and Management, 8(1), 1900500.
  2. Akdogan, N., Selimoglu, S.K. & Turkcan, M. (2020). Sustainability accounting and corporate social responsibility in Turkey and in its region. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, 19(1), 5-32.
  3. Al Amosh, H., Khatib, S. F., Alkurdi, A., & Bazhair, A. H. (2024). Capital structure decisions and environmental, social and governance performance: Insights from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 22(4), 972-989.
  4. Albertini, E. (2013). Does Environmental management ımprove financial performance? A meta-analytical review. Organization and Environment, 26(4), 431-457.
  5. Alghafes, R., Karim, S., Aliani, K., Qureishi, N., & Alkayed, L. (2024). Influence of key ESG factors on Islamic banks’ financial performance: Evidence from GCC countries. International Review of Economics and Finance, 96, 103629.
  6. Azmi, W., Hassan, M.K., Houston, R. & Karim, M.S. (2021). ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 70, 101277.
  7. Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304-1320.
  8. Bătae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Feleagă, L. (2021). The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125791.
  9. Bischof, R., Bourdier, N., Gassmann, P., Wackerbeck, P., & Marek, S. (2021). European bank transformation: Why banks can no longer ignore ESG. Strategy&, 2021. https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/de/en/industries/financial-services.html
  10. Bolibok, P. M. (2024). Does Firm Size Matter for ESG Risk? Cross-Sectional Evidence from the Banking Industry. Sustainability, 16(2), 679.
  11. Branco, M.C. & Rodrigues, L.L. (2008). Social responsibility disclosure: A study of proxies for the public visibility of Portuguese banks, The British Accounting Review, 40(2), 161-181.
  12. Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 98-115.
  13. Buallay, A. (2019a). Sustainability reporting and firm’s performance: Comparative study between manufacturing and banking sectors. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(3), 431-445.
  14. Buallay, A., Fadel, S.M., Alajmi, J.& Saudagaran, S. (2021). Sustainability reporting and bank performance after financial crisis: Evidence from developed and developing countries, Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 31(4), 747-770.
  15. Busch, T., Bauer, R., & Orlitzky, M. (2016). Sustainable development and financial markets: Old paths and new avenues. Business and Society, 55(3), 303-329.
  16. Cantero-Saiz, M., Polizzi, S., & Scannella, E. (2024). ESG and asset quality in the banking industry: The moderating role of financial performance. Research in International Business and Finance, 69, 102221.
  17. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
  18. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268-295.
  19. Chaturvedi, K., Akhtar, S., Azhar, N., & Shamshad, M. (2021). Impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance of selected banks in india: Based on camel model. Studies in Economics and Business Relations, 2(2),17-31.
  20. Chiaramonte, L., Dreassi, A., Girardone, C., & Piserà, S. (2022). Do ESG strategies enhance bank stability during financial turmoil? Evidence from Europe. The European Journal of Finance, 28(12), 1173-1211.
  21. Chih, H. L., Chih, H. H., & Chen, T. Y. (2010). On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: International evidence on the financial industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 115-135.
  22. Chouaibi, S., Chouaibi, J., & Rossi, M. (2022). ESG and corporate financial performance: The mediating role of green innovation: UK common law versus Germany civil law. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(1), 46–71.
  23. Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. Available at SSRN 2508281.
  24. Cornett, M. M., Erhemjamts, O., & Tehranian, H. (2016). Greed or good deeds: An examination of the relation between corporate social responsibility and the financial performance of US commercial banks around the financial crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 70, 137-159.
  25. Dai, Z. (2024). ESG performance and improvement of corporate accounting information quality. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 37(1), 1-19.
  26. Danisman, G. O. (2022). ESG scores and bank performance during COVID-19. In Handbook of research on global aspects of sustainable finance in times of crises (pp. 241-260). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
  27. Di Tommaso, C., & Thornton, J. (2020). Do ESG scores effect bank risk taking and value? Evidence from European banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2286-2298.
  28. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
  29. Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333-360.
  30. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
  31. El Khoury, R., Naimy, V., & Iskandar, S. (2021). ESG versus corporate financial performance: Evidence from East Asian firms in the industrials sector. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(3), 1-27.
  32. Esteban-Sanchez, P., de la Cuesta-Gonzalez, M., & Paredes-Gazquez, J. D. (2017). Corporate social performance and its relation with corporate financial performance: International evidence in the banking industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1102-1110.
  33. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64.
  34. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Stakeholder management: a strategic approach. New York: Pitman, 46.
  35. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
  36. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.
  37. Galant, A., & Cadez, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: A review of measurement approaches. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 30(1), 676-693.
  38. Gangi, F., Meles, A., D’Angelo, E., & Daniele, L. M. (2019). Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are ESG scores informative? Sustainability, 11(4), 1098.
  39. Garcia, A. S., & Orsato, R. J. (2020). Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3261-3272.
  40. Hamdi, K., Guenich, H., & Ben Saada, M. (2022). Does corporate financial performance promote ESG: Evidence from US firms. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1), 2154053.
  41. Haninun, H., Lindrianasari, L., & Denziana, A. (2018). The effect of environmental performance and disclosure on financial performance. International Journal Trade and Global Markets, 11(1/2), 138–148.
  42. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(6), 1251-1271.
  43. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834-864.
  44. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.
  45. Kusi, B. A., Gyeke-Dako, A., Agbloyor, E. K., & Darku, A. B. (2018). Does corporate governance structures promote shareholders or stakeholders value maximization? Evidence from African banks. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 18(2), 270-288.
  46. Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.
  47. Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good. and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1866371
  48. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404-424.
  49. Matuszak, Ł., & Różańska, E. (2017). CSR disclosure in Polish-listed companies in the light of Directive 2014/95/EU requirements: Empirical evidence. Sustainability, 9(12), 2304.
  50. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.
  51. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.
  52. Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2023). ESG dimensions and bank performance: An empirical investigation in Italy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(3), 563-586.
  53. Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Gonçalves, L. M. V. (2018). The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance performance: The Brazilian case. Sustainability, 10(3), 574.
  54. Oino, I. (2019). Do disclosure and transparency affect bank’s financial performance?. Corporate governance, 19(6), 1344-1361.
  55. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
  56. Purnomo, P. K., & Widianingsih, L. P. (2012). The influence of environmental performance on financial performance with corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure as a moderating variable: Evidence from listed companies in Indonesia. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 1(1), 57–69.
  57. Ribstein, L. E. (2005). Accountability and responsibility in corporate governance. Notre Dame L. Rev., 81, 1431.
  58. Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good. and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1866371