SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış / 2026 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 79

AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE USING TEXT MINING TECHNIQUES: EVIDENCE FROM BIST

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK RAPORLAMASININ FİNANSAL GÖSTERGELERE ETKİSİNİN METİN MADENCİLİĞİ İLE ANALİZİ: BİST'DEN KANITLAR

Neriman Yalçın(ADANA ALPARSLAN TÜRKEŞ BİLİM VE TEKNOLOJİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2196-4779
Mehmet Güneş(ADANA ALPARSLAN TÜRKEŞ BİLİM VE TEKNOLOJİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1938-6914
Pages
151–178
Publication Date
2026-09-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that more in-depth sustainability disclosures may have small but statistically significant effects on firms’ financial performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the impact of voluntary sustainability reporting on financial indicators of manufacturing firms listed on Borsa Istanbul over the period 2016–2023, employing text mining techniques and panel data analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample comprises sustainability and annual reports of 152 companies (8 years), corresponding to 1,216 firm-year observations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that more in-depth sustainability disclosures may have small but statistically significant effects on firms’ financial performance.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2016–2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlaması · GRI · finansal performans

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of voluntary sustainability reporting on financial indicators of manufacturing firms listed on Borsa Istanbul over the period 2016–2023, employing text mining techniques and panel data analysis. The sample comprises sustainability and annual reports of 152 companies (8 years), corresponding to 1,216 firm-year observations. First, the reports were qualitatively examined through a keyword-based content analysis grounded in the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards, assessing the depth of disclosure across environmental, social, and governance (ESG) dimensions. Subsequently, panel regression models were estimated using four financial performance measures: return on assets, financial distress, leverage ratio, and gross profit margin. The findings indicate that more in-depth sustainability disclosures may have small but statistically significant effects on firms’ financial performance.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Borsa İstanbul’da faaliyet gösteren imalat sektörü işletmelerinin 2016-2023 dönemine ait gönüllü sürdürülebilirlik raporlarının finansal göstergelere etkisini metin madenciliği ve panel veri analizi ile incelemektedir. Araştırmada, 152 şirkete (1.216 şirket-yıl) ait 8 yıllık faaliyet ve sürdürülebilirlik raporları incelenmiştir. İlk olarak raporlar GRI standartlarına dayalı anahtar kelimeler üzerinden nitel analiz yoluyla incelenmiş olup; çevre, sosyal ve yönetişim (ÇSY) anahtar kelimeleri üzerinden içerik derinliği analiz edilmiştir. Ardından toplam aktif karlılığı, finansal sıkıntı, borç oranı ve brüt kâr marjı olmak üzere dört finansal performans göstergesi üzerinden panel veri regresyonları yapılmıştır. Bulgular, metin derinliği açısından güçlü sürdürülebilirlik açıklamalarının, firmaların mali performansında zayıf ancak anlamlı ölçüde etkiler yaratabileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yalçın, N., Güneş, M. (2026). AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE USING TEXT MINING TECHNIQUES: EVIDENCE FROM BIST. Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 79, 151–178. https://doi.org/10.55322/mdbakis.1879970

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (67)

  1. Abela, M. (2022). A new direction? The Mainstreaming of Sustainability Reporting, Sustainability accounting, management and policy journal, 13(6), 1261-1283. Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The journal of finance, 23(4), 589-609.
  2. Argüden Oskay, G. ve Türker, M. (2024). Sürdürülebilirlik Yönetişim Karnesi 2023 Türkiye Raporu. Argüden Yönetişim Akademisi. https://argudenacademy.org/documents/Surdurulebilirlik-Yonetisim-Karnesi-2023-Turkiye-Raporu.pdf
  3. Arikan, O. (2022). The effect of boilerplate language on nonprofessional investors’ judgments. Accounting and Business Research, 52(4), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2021.1922990
  4. Baltagi, Badi H. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (4th ed.)
  5. Bansal, M., Samad, T. A., & Bashir, H. A. (2021). The Sustainability Reporting-Firm Performance Nexus: Evidence from a Threshold Model, Journal of Global Responsibility, 12(4), 491-512.
  6. Barone, E., & Schipper, K. (2022). Readability of financial reports and firm performance. Review of Accounting Studies, 273, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09665-7
  7. Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 267, 1036–1071.
  9. Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Levy, D. L. (2009). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.009
  10. Buallay, A. (2019). Between Cost and Value: Investigating the Effects of Sustainability Reporting on a Firm’s Performance, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 20(4), 481-496.
  11. Carungu, J., Di Pietra, R., & Molinari, M. (2021). Mandatory vs Voluntary Exercise on Non-Financial Reporting: Does a Normative/Coercive Isomorphism Facilitate an İncrease in Quality?, Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 449-476.
  12. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 334–5, 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
  13. CSRD, (2023). The Regulation on Corporate Sustainability Reporting (CSRD). https://finance.ec.europa.eu/capital-markets-union-and-financial-markets/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/corporate-sustainability-reporting_en. Son erişim tarihi: 18 Ekim 2023.
  14. Çakmak, A. (2024). Sürdürülebilirlik performansının borsa performansına etkisi (Master's thesis, Işık Üniversitesi).
  15. Detre, J. D., & Gunderson, M. A. (2011). The Triple Bottom Line: What is the Impact on the Returns to Agribusiness? International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 14(4), 165-178.
  16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.09.002.
  17. Ebaid, I. E. S. (2023). Nexus Between Sustainability Reporting and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from an Emerging Market, International Journal of Law and Management, 65(2), 152-171.
  18. Ertan, Y. (2018). Türkiye’de Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlaması (2005-2017). Journal of Accounting and Taxation Studies, 11(3), 463-478. https://doi.org/10.29067/muvu.410926
  19. García‐Sánchez, I. M., Rodríguez‐Domínguez, L., & Gallego‐Álvarez, I. (2013). Corporate governance and strategic information on the internet. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 265, 791–825.
  20. Girella, L., Zambon, S., & Rossi, P. (2021). Board Characteristics and The Choice Between Sustainability and İntegrated Reporting: A European analysis, Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(3), 562-596.
  21. Güneş, M., & Yalçın, N. (2024). The Relationship of the Russia-Ukraine War with Environmental and Financial Factors in the Energy Market: Evidence from the EU. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(3), 1038-1049.
  22. Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005
  23. Henry, E., & Peytcheva, M. (2020). Joint effects of boilerplate and text markup on the judgments of novice and experienced users of financial information. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-52582
  24. Higgins, C., Stubbs, W., & Love, T. (2014). Walking the talk (s): Organisational narratives of integrated reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1090-1119.
  25. IFAC (2023). The State of Play: Sustainability Disclosure & Assurance, https://ifacweb.blob.core.windows.net/publicfiles/2023-02/IFAC-State-of-Play-Sustainability-Assurance-Disclosures_0.pdf. Son erişim tarihi: 12 Haziran 2023.
  26. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2021). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R 2nd ed. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1418-1
  27. Kassier, L. (2024). Identifying transitions in corporate sustainability reporting: a content analysis of JSE/FTSE multinational sustainability reports from 2016 to 2021. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 91, 12.
  28. Kaya, M., & Demir, S. (2023). Türk şirketlerinin sürdürülebilirlik raporlarında çevresel, sosyal ve yönetişim ÇSY konularının analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 202398, 75-92.
  29. KGK, (2023). Soru ve Cevaplarla Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlaması Kılavuzu, https://www.kgk.gov.tr/Portalv2Uploads/files/Sustainability/Soru_ve_Cevaplarla_Surdurulebilirlik_Raporlamasi_30_05_2023-.pdf. Son erişim tarihi: 15 Eylül 2023.
  30. Kincaid, C., & Smith, N. M. (2021). Diversity and inclusion in mining: An analysis of indicators used in sustainability reporting. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(4), 100981.
  31. Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 171, 1–15.
  32. KPMG. (2020). The time has come: The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2020. KPMG International. https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2020/11/the-time-has-come-survey-of-sustainability-reporting.html
  33. KPMG. (2022). Survey of sustainability reporting 2022. Amstelveen, Netherlands: KPMG International. https://greenfinancelac.org/resources/news/kpmg-survey-of-sustainability-reporting-2022/
  34. KPMG. (2024). GRI Standards Maintain Leadership in Global Sustainability Reporting. 2024 KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting, The move to mandatory reporting
  35. Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2019). Feature Engineering and Selection: A Practical Approach for Predictive Models. CRC Press.
  36. Kumar, A., & Das, N. (2021). A text-mining approach to the evaluation of sustainability reporting practices: Evidence from a cross-country study. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 16(1), 51-60.
  37. Landrum, N. E., & Ohsowski, B. (2018). Identifying Worldviews on Corporate Sustainability: A Content Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 271, 128–151.scholars.luc.edu
  38. Lang, M., & Stice-Lawrence, L. (2015). Textual analysis and international financial reporting: Large sample evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(2–3), 110–135.
  39. Liew, T., W., Adhitya, A., & Srinivasan, R. (2014). Sustainability trends in the process industries: A text mining-based analysis. Computers in Industry, 65(3), 393-400.
  40. Liu, S. H., Chen, S. Y., & Li, S. T. (2017). Text-mining application on CSR report analytics: a study of petrochemical industry. In 2017 6th IIAI international congress on advanced applied informatics (IIAI-AAI) (pp. 76-81). IEEE.
  41. Lopez, M. V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: A Study Based On The Dow Jones Sustainability Index, Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285-300
  42. Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10‐Ks. The Journal of Finance, 661, 35–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x
  43. Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
  44. Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). Whither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 1181, 13–29.
  45. Modapothala, J. R., & Issac, B. (2009). Study of economic, environmental and social factors in sustainability reports using text mining and Bayesian analysis. In 2009 IEEE symposium on industrial electronics & applications (Vol. 1, pp. 209-214). IEEE.
  46. Morhardt, J. E., Baird, S., & Freeman, K. (2002). Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 94, 215–233.
  47. Ning, X., Yim, D., & Khuntia, J. (2021). Online sustainability reporting and firm performance: Lessons learned from text mining. Sustainability, 13(3), 1069.
  48. Nuber, C., Velte, P., & Hörisch, J. (2020). The Curvilinear And Time‐Lagging İmpact of Sustainability Performance on Financial Performance: Evidence from Germany, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 232-243.
  49. Oncioiu, I., Petrescu, A. G., Bîlcan, F. R., Petrescu, M., Popescu, D. M., & Anghel, E. (2020). Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Financial Performance. Sustainability, 12(10), 4297.
  50. Pekin, S. (2020). Finansal performans tahmininde metin madenciliğinin kullanımı: Bist imalat sanayi işletmelerinde bir araştırma (Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University (Turkey)).
  51. Reddy, K., & Gordon, L. (2010). The Effect of Sustainability Reporting on Financial Performance: An empirical study using listed companies, Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 6(2), 19-42.
  52. Ross, S. A. (1977). The determination of financial structure: The incentive-signalling approach. The bell journal of economics, 23-40.
  53. Saban, M., Küçüker, H., & Küçüker, M. (2017). Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik İle İlgili Raporlama Çerçeveleri Ve Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlamasinda Muhasebenin Rolü. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 5(1), 101-115.
  54. Süleyman, E. & Mirgen, Ç. (2022). Finansal Olmayan Raporlamaya Yolculuk ve Şirket Performansının Finansal Olmayan Raporlama Üzerindeki Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi: BİST 50 Şirketleri üzerine bir araştırma. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (37), 35-54.
  55. Thewissen, J., Arslan-Ayaydin, Ö., Shrestha, P., Torsin, W., & Grava, T. (2022). The thematic content of ESG reports: A topic modeling approach. Available at SSRN.
  56. Van Het Hof, S. D., & Hoştut, S. (2021). Türkiye'de Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlaması ve Kurumsal İtibar Sustainability Reporting and Corporate Reputation in Turkey.
  57. Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG Performance Have an İmpact On Financial Performance? Evidence from Germany, Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169-178.
  58. Velte, P. (2023). The Link Between Corporate Governance And Corporate Financial Misconduct. A Review of Archival Studies And İmplications For Future Research, Management Review Quarterly, 73(1), 353-411.
  59. Vitale, G., Cupertino, S., & Riccaboni, A. (2023). The Effects Of Mandatory Non-Financial Reporting On Financial Performance. a Multidimensional İnvestigation on Global Agri-Food Companies, British Food Journal, 125(13), 99-124.
  60. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data 2nd ed. MIT Press.
  61. Yalçın, N. & Güneş, M. (2023). The Relationship Between Sustainability And Earnings Management: A Study On OECD Countries, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 25(MODAV 19. Uluslararası Muhasebe Konferansı Özel Sayısı), 365-390.
  62. Yılmaz, D. (2022). Borsa İstanbul'da işlem gören şirketlerin sürdürülebilirlik raporlarının içerik analizi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 141, 45-60.
  63. Yılmaz, I. (2021). Sustainability And Financial Performance Relationship: International Evidence, World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(3), 537-549.te
  64. Yu, W., Wang, X., & Wang, J. (2023). Lexical Diversity and Its Relationship with Financial Disclosure Quality. Journal of Business Communication, 601, 102–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219436221099633
  65. Zhou, Y., Wang, X., & Yuen, K. F. (2021). Sustainability disclosure for container shipping: A text-mining approach. Transport Policy, 110, 465-477.
  66. Ziegler, A., Schröder, M., & Rennings, K. (2007). The Effect of Environmental and Social Performance on The Stock Performance Of European Corporations, Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 661-680.
  67. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2021). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R 2nd ed. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1418-1