Journals / TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni / 2011 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 5

Development and evaluation of the Health Belief Model Scale in obesity

Obezitede Sağlık İnanç Modeli Ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi

Pages
533–542
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: These results show that HBMSO is a reliable and valid scale to measure the attitudes and beliefs of the obese individuals about obesity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a scale based on the Health Belief Model which can provide a reliable and valid evaluation of obese individuals’ belief and attitudes towards obesity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHOD: The sample of the study that was conducted between July 2008 and May 2010 included 400 obese individuals who presented to the obesity clinics in Ege University Medical Faculty and Celal Bayar University Medical Faculty Hospitals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: These results show that HBMSO is a reliable and valid scale to measure the attitudes and beliefs of the obese individuals about obesity.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a scale based on the Health Belief Model which can provide a reliable and valid evaluation of obese individuals&#8217; belief and attitudes towards obesity. METHOD: The sample of the study that was conducted between July 2008 and May 2010 included 400 obese individuals who presented to the obesity clinics in Ege University Medical Faculty and Celal Bayar University Medical Faculty Hospitals. Obesity questionnaire form and Health Belief Model Scale in Obesity (HBMSO) developed by the investigators to collect data about sociodemographic and obesity characteristics of obese individuals as well as the health belief in obesity were completed in face-to-face interviews. The HBMSO were completed in face-to-face interviews again in the following three weeks to test-retest reliability of the scale. The analysis of data was The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 13.0. RESULTS: A principal component factor analysis was used to measure the construct validity of the HBMSO. Five factor groups were obtained as a result of the factor analysis. These five factors formed the domains of the HBMOS that included 32 items prepared as five point Likert scales. Total item correlation analysis was positive for all domains (>0.70 p<0.05). HBMSO demonstrated a reasonable level of internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach&#8217;s Alpha Coefficient of 0.80. Test and retest reliability of each domain of HBMSO was r>0.60 p<0.00. CONCLUSION: These results show that HBMSO is a reliable and valid scale to measure the attitudes and beliefs of the obese individuals about obesity.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmada, obez bireylerin obeziteye yönelik tutum ve inançlarını güvenilir ve geçerli biçimde değerlendirebilecek Sağlık İnanç Modeli’ne dayalı bir ölçeğin geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. YÖNTEM: Çalışmanın örneklemine Temmuz 2008-Mayıs 2010 tarihleri arasında Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi ve Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi (Üniversite Hastanesi)’nin obezite kliniklerine başvuran 400 obez birey dâhil edilmiştir. Çalışma verileri araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen obez bireylerin sosyodemografik ve obezite ile ilgili özeliklerini ve obezitede sağlık inançlarını içeren Obezite Soru Formu ve Obezite Sağlık İnanç Modeli Ölçeği (OSİMÖ) kullanılarak yüz yüze görüşme tekniği ile toplanmıştır. OSİMÖ’nin geçerliliğini test etmek amacıyla ölçek üç hafta içerisinde yüz yüze görüşme tekniği ile tekrar uygulanmıştır (test-tekrar test). Veriler The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 13.0 paket programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. BULGULAR: Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliğini belirlemek amacıyla uygulanan faktör analizi sonucunda beş faktör grubu ve 32 madde elde edilmiştir. Bu beş faktör ölçeğin alt boyutlarını oluşturmaktadır. Beşli likert puanlama sistemine sahip olan ölçeğin toplam madde korelasyonları her bir alt boyutu için pozitiftir (> 0.70 p 0.60 p<0.00 olarak belirlenmiştir. SONUÇ: Çalışma sonuçları, OSİMÖ’nin obez bireylerin obeziteye yönelik tutum ve inançlarını ölçmekte kullanılabilir geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEDELİ, Ö., FADILOĞLU, Ç. (2011). Development and evaluation of the Health Belief Model Scale in obesity. TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 5, 533–542. https://ajindex.com/articles/129434

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. 1 Kelly BE. Obesity Health and Medical Issue. London. Greenwood Pres, 2006. 2 World Health Organization (1998). Obesitypreventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation on obesity 3-5 June Geneva: World Health Organization. 3 Food Standarts Agency (2004). Obesity rates worldwide._http://www.food.gov.uk/healthiereati ng/promotion/issue/obesityratesworldwide/ [Acces date:10.05.2010]. 4 American Obesity Association (2004).Obesity, a global_epidemic_http://www.obesity.org./subs/fa stfacts/obesity_global_epidemic.shtml [Acces date:10.05.2010]. 5 Yalçın M, Şahin M, Yalçın E. Prevalence and epidermiological risk factors of obesity in Turkey. Middle East Journal of Family Medicine. 2004
  2. 6 Onat A. Türkiye'de obezitenin kardiyovasküler hastalıklara etkisi. Türk Kardiyol Dern Arş. 2003
  3. 7 Wadden TA, Stunkard JA (Eds). Handbook of obesity treatment 1. Edition The Guildford Pres
  4. 8 Sapp SG, Weng CY. Examination of the healthbelief model to predict the dietary quality and body mass of adults. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2006. 9 Nejad L, Wertheim E, Greenwood K. Comparison of the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of dieting and fasting behavior. E-Journal of Applied Psychology. 2005
  5. 1(1): 63-74. 10 Acikel CH, Kilic S. Selection of statistical methods in medical researches. TAF Prev Med Bull. 2004
  6. 3(7): 162-163. 11 Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika.1974
  7. 12 Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and internal structure of test. Psychometrika. 1951
  8. 13 Campbell DT, Fiske JL. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychol Bull. 1959
  9. 14 Kelly K. The behavior and psychology of weight management. JAAPA. 2004
  10. 15 Daddario DK. A review of the use of the health belief model for weight management MedSurg Nursing_2007_http://findarticles.com/p/articles/ mi_m0FSS/is_6_16/ai_n24964183 [Acces date:12.03.2010]. 16 Jeffery RW. How can health behavior theory be made more useful for intervention research? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2004
  11. 1(10): 1-5. 17 Michail BL. The health belief model: A review and critical evaluation of the model. Research practice. Eds.: Hinn PL. Developing substance mid-range. Theory in nursing advanced in nursing science series. An Apsen Publication Maryland. 1994, p. 72-92. 18 Champion VL. Use of the health belief mod