Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2002 / Sayı: 5

POLICY AND PROCEDURES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE

Pages
211–224
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The French Public Service Policy and Procedures has been recommended by author as the best international practice for all countries which desire to be in European Union.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkey desires to join the European Union.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There is a need to prepare a reform for administration in this country.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The French Public Service Policy and Procedures has been recommended by author as the best international practice for all countries which desire to be in European Union.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Makro Yönetim · Yönetim Reformu · Fransız Modeli

Abstract

Turkey desires to join the European Union. There is a need to prepare a reform for administration in this country. Macro-management reform needs a model, which can be accepted by European Union. This article is an attempt to propose an application of international civil service laws. It deals with recruitment, training, promotion, relocation, and redundancy of staff members. The French Public Service Policy and Procedures has been recommended by author as the best international practice for all countries which desire to be in European Union.

Özet

Türkiye Avrupa Birliğine girmek istemektedir. Bu sebepten dolayı ülke yönetiminde reforma ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Makro yönetim reformu Avrupa Birliği tarafından kabul edilecek bir model olmalıdır. Bu makale uluslararası sivil hizmet yaslarının bir uygulamasını teklif etmek üzere yazılmıştır. Personel alınması, eğitimi, terfisi, yer değiştirmesi ve fazlalığıyla ilgilidir. Fransız Kamu Hizmeti Politika ve Prosedürleri yazar tarafından Avrupa Birliğine girmek isteyen tüm ülkeler için en iyi uluslararası uygulama olarak önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZIARATI, S. (2002). POLICY AND PROCEDURES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Sayı: 5, 211–224. https://ajindex.com/articles/129262

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. BROWN, L.N., GARNER, J.F. (1993).
  2. French Administrative Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 4thed. CHAPUS, R. (1993).
  3. Droit administratif general, Paris: Montchrestien, 7e edition. Documentation Francaise. (1994).
  4. La Fontion Publique de VEtat, La documentation Française, Rapport annuel (Mars 1993- Mars 1994), Paris, 353 pages. European Union Commission. (1997).
  5. Strenthing Public Administration, TACIS Project, Kazakstan. French Republic, Ministry of Public Service. (1996). Status general de Service publique. GUEDON, MJ. (1992). Les autorites adminstatrives independentes, Paris: LGDJ (coll. Systeme). JEAN-PIERRE, D. (1999).
  6. L'Ethique du Fonctionnaire Civil, Bibiliotheaue de Droit Publique, Tome 20, Paris: Edion de Librairie General de Droit et de Jurisprudence (LGDJ). LOCHAK, D. (1992).
  7. La Justice Administrative, Paris: Montchretien (clefs). MACHIN, H. (1977). The Perfect in French Public Adminstration, London: Croom Helm. MAUS, D. (1993). Les grand textes de la pratique institutionnelle, Paris: La documentation française (Notes et etudes documentaires). Republique Française, Ministere de la Fonction Publique: 2000, Status General des Fonctionnaires de l'Etat: Legislation et Reglementation, Direction General de l'Administration et de la Fonction Publique (DGAFP), Paris: Les edition des journaux officiels, 891 pages. Republique Française. (1994.) Documentation d'Etüde sur la Modernisation de VAdminstration, Paris: DGAFP, 99 pages. ROY-LOUSTAUNAU, C. (1995). Le droit du harcelement sexuel: un puzzle legislatif et des choix novateurs, Droit social, Paris, Pages 545-550.
  8. STEVES, A. (1992).
  9. The Government and Politics ofFrance, London: MacMillan. ZIARATI, S. (1997). Policy and Procedures of the Civil Service, European Union Commission, Report of mission in Khazakstan, Almaty: Prime Ministry Office.