SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Oğuzhan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

MODULE BASED ERP (ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING ) SOFTWARE SELECTION BY AHP METHOD FOR LOCKS FACTORY

KİLİT FABRİKASI İÇİN AHP YÖNTEMİ İLE MODÜL TABANLI ERP (Kurumsal Kaynak Planlama) YAZILIMI SEÇİMİ

Mehmet Yavuz Kankavı(TC Kültür Üniversitesi)0000-0002-6270-3292
Batuhan Kocaoğlu(PİRİ REİS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6876-1362
Pages
64–71
Publication Date
2022-06-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

ERP software, which can manage activities in orchestral harmony, will contribute greatly to increasing their efficiency and being ahead of the competition.ERP Software selection,as an expensive investment,requires careful decision for the companies So multi criteria decision making methods can provide good base for satisfactory decisions.In this study ,AHP( Analytic Hierarchy Process ) one of the most popular multi criteria technique will be used to select the most suitable ERP software for the company.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Enterprise resource planning is a critical success potential system in our age for the companies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:More and more companies and sectors are turning to Enterprise resource planning software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:ERP software, which can manage activities in orchestral harmony, will contribute greatly to increasing their efficiency and being ahead of the competition.ERP Software selection,as an expensive investment,requires careful decision for the companies So multi criteria decision making methods can provide good base for satisfactory decisions.In this study ,AHP( Analytic Hierarchy Process ) one of the most popular multi criteria technique will be used to select the most suitable ERP software for the company.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:AHP · ERP · seçim kriterleri

Abstract

Enterprise resource planning is a critical success potential system in our age for the companies. More and more companies and sectors are turning to Enterprise resource planning software. ERP software, which can manage activities in orchestral harmony, will contribute greatly to increasing their efficiency and being ahead of the competition.ERP Software selection,as an expensive investment,requires careful decision for the companies So multi criteria decision making methods can provide good base for satisfactory decisions.In this study ,AHP( Analytic Hierarchy Process ) one of the most popular multi criteria technique will be used to select the most suitable ERP software for the company.

Özet

Kurumsal kaynak planlaması günümüz dünyasında şirketlerin çalışma dünyasında önemli yeri olan bir sistemdir. Giderek daha fazla şirket ve sektör ERP( Kurumsal Kaynak Planlama) yazılımlarına yönelmektedirler. Faaliyetleri orkestra uyumunda koordine etmesi beklenen ERP yazılımları şirket içi verimliliğin artışına ve şirketin piyasa rekabetinde ön saflarda yer almasına katkıda bulunabilir. Ancak pahalı bir yatırım olan ERP yazılım seçimi dikkatle yapılmalıdır. Çok kriterli karar verme teknikleri doğru karara ulaşmakta yardımcı olurlar. Bu çalışmada en uygun ERP yazılım seçiminde en popüler çok kriterli karar verme tekniklerinden olan AHP kullanılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kankavı, M. Y., Kocaoğlu, B. (2022). MODULE BASED ERP (ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING ) SOFTWARE SELECTION BY AHP METHOD FOR LOCKS FACTORY. Oğuzhan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.55580/oguzhan.1120069

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anandarajan, A., ve Wen, H. J. (1999). Evaluation of Information Technology Investment. Management Decision, 37(4), 329-339. doi:10.1108/00251749910269375
  2. Davenport, T. H. (2000). Mission critical: Realizing the promise of Enterprise Systems. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  3. Farbey, B., Targett, D., ve Land, F. (1994). Matching an IT project with an appropriate method of evaluation: A research note on ‘evaluating investments in it’. Journal of Information Technology, 9(3), 239-243. doi:10.1057/jit.1994.23
  4. Irani, Z., Ezingeard, J., ve Grieve, R. (1997). Integrating the costs of a manufacturing it/is infrastructure into the investment decision-making process. Technovation, 17(11-12), 695-706. doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(97)00060-6
  5. Karaarslan, N., ve Gundogar, E. (2008). An application for modular capability-based ERP software selection using AHP Method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 42(9-10), 1025-1033. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1522-5
  6. Kumar, V., Maheshwari, B., ve Kumar, U. (2003). An investigation of critical management issues in ERP implementation: Emperical evidence from Canadian organizations. Technovation, 23(10), 793-807. doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(02)00015-9
  7. Maiden, N., ve Ncube, C. (1998). Acquiring cots software selection requirements. IEEE Software, 15(2), 46-56. doi:10.1109/52.663784
  8. Timor, M. (2010). Yöneylem araştırması. İstanbul: Türkmen Kitabevi.
  9. Teltumbde, A. (2000). A framework for evaluating ERP projects. International Journal of Production Research, 38(17), 4507-4520. doi:10.1080/00207540050205262
  10. Umble, E. J., Haft, R. R., ve Umble, M. (2003). Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2), 241-257. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00547-7
  11. Verville, J., ve Halingten, A. (2002). An investigation of the decision process for selecting an ERP software: The case of ESC. Management Decision, 40(3), 206-216. doi:10.1108/00251740210420156
  12. Verville, J., ve Halingten, A. (2003). The effect of team composition and group role definition on ERP acquisition decisions. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 9(5/6), 115-130. doi:10.1108/13527590310493864
  13. Yusuf, Y., Gunasekaran, A., ve Abthorpe, M. S. (2004). Enterprise Information Systems Project Implementation:. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 251-266. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.10.004