Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

CIVIL SOCIETY AND CIVIC CONSCIOUSNESS

SİVİL TOPLUM VE SOSYAL BİLİNÇ

Pages
59–70
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Indeed, the demise of meta-narratives in post-modern times does not tend to lead to a more civil society because of the vicissitude of this extant institutional inadequacy, which appears to be created by the decline of cultural understanding of civic consciousness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The meta-narratives of modern times are considered as the most significant factors impeding the development of the civil society' that coincided with the western definition of democracy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Nevertheless, this article suggests that the real problem was institutional inadequacy, which was produced by lack of civic consciousness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Indeed, the demise of meta-narratives in post-modern times does not tend to lead to a more civil society because of the vicissitude of this extant institutional inadequacy, which appears to be created by the decline of cultural understanding of civic consciousness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sivil toplum · demokrasi · sosyal bilinç

Abstract

The meta-narratives of modern times are considered as the most significant factors impeding the development of the civil society' that coincided with the western definition of democracy. Nevertheless, this article suggests that the real problem was institutional inadequacy, which was produced by lack of civic consciousness. The best evidence for this argument is the search by theoreticians for a civic consciousness despite their different ideological orientations. Indeed, the demise of meta-narratives in post-modern times does not tend to lead to a more civil society because of the vicissitude of this extant institutional inadequacy, which appears to be created by the decline of cultural understanding of civic consciousness.

Özet

Modern zamanların büyük söylemleri genellikle batı dünyasının demokrasi tanımına uygun bir sivil toplumun geli imini engelleyen en önemli faktörler olarak de erlendirilmektedir. Buna kar ın bu makale gerçek eksikli in sosyal bilinçsizli in do urdu u kurumsal bir sorun oldu unu ifade etmektedir. Bu önermenin en güzel kanıtı farklı ideolojik yönelimlerden gelen teorisyenlerin aynı sosyal bilinci aramı olmalarıdır. Nitekim, modern sonrası zamanlarda büyük söylemlerin geçerlili ini yitirmi olmaları daha sivil bir toplumu ortaya çıkaramamaktadır çünkü aynı yetersizlik sosyal bilincin kültürel anlayışının zayıflamasının sonucu olarak devamlılığını sürdürmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, M. (2004). CIVIL SOCIETY AND CIVIC CONSCIOUSNESS. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 59–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/129139

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. ALFORD, R. & FRIEDLAND, R. (1985) Powers of theory: capitalism the state and democracy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  2. BIRNBAUM P. (1975)
  3. Le Pouvoir politique. Paris, Dalloy. CARNOY, M. (1980) The sate and political theory. Princeton, UP. COT, J. P. & MOUNIER, J.P. (1974)
  4. Pour une sociologie politique. Paris, Tonce. DUNLEAVY, P. & O`LEARY, B. (1987)
  5. The new right, Theories of State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy, Macmillan. DUNN, J. (1992) Democracy the unfinished journey. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  6. FULLER, G.E. (1996)
  7. Demokrasi tuza ı. Istanbul, Altın Kitaplar. GELLNER, E. (1994) Conditions of liberty - civil society and its rivals. New York, Penguin Press.
  8. GEMALMAZ, M. S. (1989)
  9. Turkish type of democracy. Istanbul, Amaç. GRAMSCI, A. (1971) Selections from the prison notebooks. Lawrence and Wishart. MOUZELIS, N. (1995) Modernity, late development and civil society, in J.A. HALL (Ed.), Civil Society, Cambridge, Polity Press,. HELD D. (1983)
  10. States and societies. New York, New York University Press.
  11. HIGLEY, J.; BURTON, M. and FIELD, L. (1990)
  12. In defense of the new elite paradigm, American Sociological Review, Vol. 55. HIGLEY, J. & GUNTHER, R (1992). Elites and democratic consolidation in latin America and Southern Europe. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  13. HOFFMAN, J. (1995)
  14. Beyond the state. Cambridge, Polity Press. JOHN A. & HALL, J. A. (1994) Coercion and consent: studies on the modern state. Cambridge, Polity Press.
  15. KEANE, J. (1988) Civil society and the state. Verso. MICHELS R. (1971)
  16. Les Partis politiques. Paris, Flammarion. MOMMSEN, J.W. (1989) The political and social theory of Max Weber. Cambridge, Polity Press.
  17. ENTELIS J.P. (1996) Civil society and the authoritarian temptation in Algerian politics: Islamic democracy Versus The Centralized State, in A.R. NORTON (Ed.), Civil Society in the Middle East, Leiden, E. J. Brill. O`MALLEY, J. (1994) Marx` early political writings. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  18. PAINE, T. (1969) The rights of man. Penguin Publishers.
  19. PARRY, G. & MORAN, M. (1992) Democracy and democratization. London, Routledge. SMITH, S. B. (1989) Hegel`s critique of liberalism. Chicago, Chicago University Press.
  20. TAYLOR, C. (1992) Multi-culturalism and the politics of recognition, Cambridge, Harvard University Press TARCOV, N. (1992) Locke`s second treatise and `the best fence against rebellion., in J. LOSCO & L. WILLIAMS (Eds.), Political Theory, New York, St. Martin`s Press.
  21. WEBER, M. (1959) Le Savant et