Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The Cointegration Analysis of Turkey's Export Demand Function by Bounds Test

Türkiye'nin İhracaat Talebi Fonksiyonunun Sınır Testi Yöntemi ile Eşbütünleşme Analizi

Pages
144–152
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results show that monetary, fiscal and exchange rate policies may be used as substitutive policies to correct unfavourable trade balance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study includes an econometric analysis of the export demand behaviour by using Turkey's annual data that cover 32 years periods from 1970 to 2002.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, the 'bounds test' method of Pesaran et al (2001) was used to investigate the long run relationship between export demand, and its determinants, namely income and relative prices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results show that monetary, fiscal and exchange rate policies may be used as substitutive policies to correct unfavourable trade balance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Türkiye · Turkey

Abstract

This study includes an econometric analysis of the export demand behaviour by using Turkey's annual data that cover 32 years periods from 1970 to 2002. In the study, the 'bounds test' method of Pesaran et al (2001) was used to investigate the long run relationship between export demand, and its determinants, namely income and relative prices. As a result of this empirical analysis, it was demonstrated that export volume, income and relative prices were cointegrated. The estimated long term elasticities of export demand with respect to income and relative prices are 0.21 and -1.684, respectively. The sum of the elasticities of import and export demand exceeds one (-1.01) i.e., Marshall-Lerner condition holds. These results show that monetary, fiscal and exchange rate policies may be used as substitutive policies to correct unfavourable trade balance.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye'nin 1970'den 2002 yılına kadar kadar olan 32 yıllık dönemini kapsayan yıllık verileri kullanarak yapılan ihracat talebinin ekonometrik analizini içermektedir. Çalışmada, ihracat talebi ile ihracat talebini belirleyen etkenler olan gelir ve nispi fiyatlar arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişkiyi incelemek amacıyla Pesaran, ve öte. (2001)'in sınır testi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu ampirik analizin sonucunda, ihracatla, gelir ve nispi fiyatların eşbütünleşik oldukları görülmüştür. İhracat talebinin, gelir ve nispi fiyatlara göre tahmin edilen uzun dönem esneklikleri sırayla; 0.21 ve - 1.684 olarak bulunmuştur. İthalat ve ihracat fiyat esnekliklerinin toplamı birden büyüktür. (-1.01) Marshall-Lerner koşulu sağlanmaktadır. Bu sonuçlar; parasal, mali ve döviz kuru politikalarının halen mevcut olan aleyhteki ticaret dengesinin düzeltilmesinde yardımcı araçlar olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİMŞEK, M., KADILAR, C. (2005). The Cointegration Analysis of Turkey's Export Demand Function by Bounds Test. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 144–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/129066

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. (1986). Determinants of international trade flows: the case of developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 20, 107-23. ss. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. (1998). Cointegration approach to estimate the long-run trade elasticities in LDCs, International Economic Journal. 12 (3), 89-96.ss. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. ve NIROOMAND, F. (1998). Long-run price elasticities and the Marshall-Lerner condition revisited. Economics Letters, 61,101-9.ss. BARDSEN, G. (1989). Estimation of long run coefficient in error correction models. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 51, 345-350.ss. BOYD, D., CAPORALE, G.M. ve D SMITH, R. (2001). Real exchange rate effects on the balance of trade: cointegration and the Marshall-Lerner condition. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 6, 187-200.ss. COŞAR, E.E. (2002). Price and income elasticities of Turkish export demand: a panel data application. Central Bank Review, 2, 19-53.SS. DİE. (2003). istatistik Göstergeler, (1923-2002).
  2. DPT. (2004). Ekonomik ve Sosyal Göstergeler, (1950-2003).
  3. ENGLE, R.F. ve GRANGER, C.V.J. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing, Econometrica. 55, 251-76.ss. IMF(2002). Financial Statistical Yearbook. JOHANSEN, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(1), 231-54.ss. JOHANSEN, S. ve JUSELIUS, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210.ss. KHAN, M. (1974). Import and export demand in developing countries. IMF Staff Papers, 21, 678-693.SS. KREININ, E.M. (1967). Price elasticities in international tradet. Review of Economics and Statistics, 49, 510-16.ss. KREMERS, J.J.M., ERICSSON, N.L. ve DOLADO, J. (1992). The power of cointegration tests. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, pp. 325-348.
  4. MAH, J.S. (2000). An empirical examination of the disaggregated import demand of Korea - the case of information technology products. Journal of Asian Economics, Vol.11, 237-244.SS. MARQUEZ, J. ve MCNEILLY, C. (1988). Income and price elasticities for exports of developing countries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, 306-14.ss. MARQUEZ, J. (1990).
  5. Bilateral trade elasticities, Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 70-77.ss. OSTRAY, J. ve ROSE, A. (1992). An empirical evaluation of the macroeconomic effects of tariffs. Journal of International