Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Pearl Harbor ve Hiroşima: İronik Bir Karşılaştırma

Pearl Harbor and Hiroshima: An Ironic Comparison

Pages
123–131
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Though the aerial attacks are often related in popular American perception, the truth is they were incommensurate events in terms of their military and political objectives, their physical scale and results, and the natures of their targets.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the past century, veterans of America's wars have shown extraordinary human longevity in the postwar eras.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Public historical debates in the United States have recently focused on the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor (194J) and the American attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1945).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Though the aerial attacks are often related in popular American perception, the truth is they were incommensurate events in terms of their military and political objectives, their physical scale and results, and the natures of their targets.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the past century, veterans of America's wars have shown extraordinary human longevity in the postwar eras. As a result, contemporary public historical interpretations of the American second, world war experience have been influenced by veterans' perceptions of historical issues for a longer time than was true of postwar eras before the twentieth centuiy. Public historical debates in the United States have recently focused on the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor (194J) and the American attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1945). These events may seem quite dated by now, but they have remarkable contemporary resonance in light of debates over proliferation of nuclear weapons and tactics of so-called pre-emptive warfare. Though the aerial attacks are often related in popular American perception, the truth is they were incommensurate events in terms of their military and political objectives, their physical scale and results, and the natures of their targets.

Özet

II. Dünya Savaşı gazileri, bu savaşın en önemli iki olayında halk hissiyatında büyük bir yer tutmuşlardır: 1941'deki Japonların Pearl Harbor ve Amerika'nın 1945'deki Hiroşima saldırılan. Bu çalışma, II. Dünya savaş döneminden itibaren bu iki saldırının Amerikan kamu oyunda bir benzeri olup olmadığını inceler. Bu karşılaştırmada; 1) Japon ve Amerikan saldırılarının amaçları; 2) bu saldırıların boyutları; 3) bu saldırıların şekli irdelenmektedir. Ancak, tam bir karşılaştırma yapmak olanaksızdır. İronik olarak, Amerika yeni küçük bir nükleer silah geliştirmeyi düşünürken, Japon hükümeti, Pearl Harbor saldırısında olduğu gibi, potansiyel Kuzey Kore saldırısı korkusuyla caydırıcı nükleer programı planlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAHONEY, L. J. (2005). Pearl Harbor ve Hiroşima: İronik Bir Karşılaştırma. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 123–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/129035

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. A Very misguided exhibit. (1994). Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, 22nd August. ADAMS, J. (1995). The New spies: exploring the frontier of espionage. London, Pimlico. ALPEROVITZ, G. (1995). The Fire still burns: an interview with gar alperovitz. Sojourners Magazine July/August: http://www.sojo.net/index.cfm?
  2. At Hiroshima Rite, Fears of a New Nuclear Age. (2003). International Herald Tribune, 7th August. BAILEY, H. (2003). Pictures of Controversy. Newsweek, 19Ul May. BAY, A. (2003)
  3. Containing the Deep Diggers, The Washington Times, 15lh August. BLUM, J. M. (1968) World War II. In: Woodward, C. V. ed. The Comparative Approach to American History. New York: Basic Books. BOVA, B. (1986) Star Peace: Assured Survival. New York: TOR. BRADSHAW, P. (2001) Torture! Torture! Torture, The Guardian: G2, 1st June. BROAD, W. J. (2003) U. S. Presses Program for New Atom Bombs, International Herald Tribune, 4lh August. BURUMA, I. (2001) Oh! What a Lovely War, The Guardian: G2, 28th May. CAGLE, J. Pearl Harbor's Top Gun, Time, 11th June. CARROLL, J. (1997) It Was Hiroshima's Bad Luck To Lack Kyoto's Cultural Riches, The Boston Globe, 5th August.Claptrap Distortion of History. (1995) Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, 9th August. CLINES, F. X. (2001) Civil War Rages On, and On and On, International HeraldTribune, 29th November. COOPER, R. T. (2003)
  4. Making Nuclear Bombs 'Usable', Los Angeles Times, 3rd February. COWLEY, J. (2003)
  5. Where Living Is Lethal, Newsweek, 22nd September. DAVIDSON, K. (2003) Nuclear-powered Spacecraft Plan Feared, San Francisco Chronicle, 4th February. Disney Launches 'Pearl Harbor Blockbusters on Navy Aircraft Carrier. (2001) The Turkish Daily News, 23rd May. DYSON, G. (2002) Project Orion: The Atomic Spaceship, 1957-1965. London: Penguin. Even Enemy Is Represented at Vietnam Art Museum. (2001) The Turkish Daily News, 23rd May. FOUNTAIN, N. (2000)
  6. Thomas Ferebee, The Guardian, 20th March. FRENCH, H. W. (2001) For 'Pearl Harbor, a Mixed Premiere in Tokyo, International Herald Tribune, 23rd June. Glory Days. (2003) The Economist, 26th July. GORDON, A. (2003) A Modem History of Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.
  7. HARDIN, B. (2001) New Respect for December 7 Survivors, International Herald Tribune, 8th-9'h December. HAYS, J. D. (1978) World War II: War in the Central and Northern Pacific.Encyclopedia Americana. Vol 29, p. 483. New York: Encyclopedia Americana. Hollywood Varies Its Views on World War II. (2001) Turkish News, 26'h-27th May.In Brief.