SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

The Financial Performance-Corporate Reputation Nexus in Turkey in the Institutional Theory Context

Kurumsal Teori Bağlamında Türkiye’de Finansal Performans-Firma İtibarı İlişkisi

Mehmet Ali PİŞKİN
Ayşe İLGÜN KAMANLI
Pages
117–132
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that any increase in companies’ assets fosters the perceptions of stakeholders in next period while a raise in indebtedness causes worse reputation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The scholars who indicate the institutional quality as one of main sources of economic growth state that any endeavor of companies increasing production and employment are no longer sufficient for sustainable growth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, economies need intangible assets such as corporate reputation CR .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that any increase in companies’ assets fosters the perceptions of stakeholders in next period while a raise in indebtedness causes worse reputation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kurumsal teori · firma itibarı · finansal performans

Abstract

The scholars who indicate the institutional quality as one of main sources of economic growth state that any endeavor of companies increasing production and employment are no longer sufficient for sustainable growth. Therefore, economies need intangible assets such as corporate reputation CR . CR entirely depends on stakeholders’ perception. In this study, we investigate the potential linkage between CR and financial performances of companies, which can affect the stakeholders’ perception, in Turkey between 2006 and 2016. The results show that any increase in companies’ assets fosters the perceptions of stakeholders in next period while a raise in indebtedness causes worse reputation.

Özet

İktisadi büyümenin ana kaynaklarından biri olarak kurumsal kaliteyi gösteren araştırmacılar, sürdürülebilir büyüme için firmaların üretim ve istihdam artışı sağlama çabalarının artık yeterli olmadığını belirtmektedirler. Dolayısıyla ekonomilerin firma itibarı gibi maddi olmayan duran varlıklara ihtiyaçları vardır. Firma itibarı tamamen paydaşların algılarına dayanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de 2006-2016 yılları arasında firma itibarı ile paydaşların algılarını etkileyebilen finansal performans arasındaki potansiyel ilişki incelenmektedir. Sonuçlar, şirketlerin varlıklarındaki herhangi bir artışın bir sonraki dönemde paydaşların algılarını artırdığını, borçluluktaki artışın ise daha kötü bir firma itibarı yarattığını gösteriyor

🔖

Cite This Article

PİŞKİN, M. A., KAMANLI, A. İ. (2020). The Financial Performance-Corporate Reputation Nexus in Turkey in the Institutional Theory Context. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 117–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/129022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Al-Shubiri, F. N., Al-Abedallat, A. Z., and Abu Orabi, M. M. (2012). Financial and non financial determinants of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 2(5), 1-7.
  2. Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., and Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. The Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
  3. Baltagi, B. H., Bresson, G., and Pirotte, A. (2003). Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman-Taylor?: A pretest estimator. Economics Letters, 79(3), 361-369.
  4. Basdeo, D. K., Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Rindova, V. P., and Derfus, P. J. (2006). The impact of market actions on firm reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1205-1219.
  5. Baughn, C. C., Bodie, N. L., and McIntosh, J. C. (2007). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Asian countries and other geographical regions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(4), 189-205.
  6. Bendixen, M., and Abratt, R. (2007). Corporate identity, ethics and reputation in supplier–buyer relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 69-82.
  7. Blajer-Golebiewska, A., and Kozlowski, A. (2016). Financial determinants of corporate reputation: A short-term approach. Managerial Economics, 17(2), 179- 201. Brammer, S. J., and Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435-455.
  8. Bromley, D. B. (2001). Relationship between personal and corporate reputation in supplier-buyer relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 316-334.
  9. Brouthers, K. D. (2013). A retrospective on: Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44, 14-22.
  10. Carmeli, A., and Cohen, A. (2001). Organizational reputation as a source of sustainable competitive advantage and above-normal performance: an empirical test among local authorities in Israel. Public Administration & Management: An Interactive Journal, 6(4), 122-165.
  11. Carmeli, A., and Freund, A. (2002). The relationship between work and workplace attitudes and perceived external prestige. Corporate Reputation Review, 5(1), 51- 68. Cullen, J. B., Parboteeah, K. P., and Hoegl, M. (2004). Cross-national differences in managers’ willingness to justify ethically suspect behaviors: A test of institutional anomie theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 411-421. Çalışkan,